Estética de lo cotidiano, estética del cuidado
Everyday Aesthetics, Care Aesthetics
Abstract
In Yuriko Saito, everyday aesthetics interlinks with ethics by means of the so-called moral-aesthetic judgments, where the formal assessment of the practical object depends on how beneficial it is to its user. This interest in the person who has to make use of the artifact, bringing an experience of otherness, of virtually putting oneself in someone’s else position, connects with Hume's sympathetic functionalism, but goes beyond by extending to the vulnerable other that the welfare society tends to through the ethics of care. This allows us to consider the aesthetics of daily life in Saito as an aesthetics of care.
Downloads
References
KANT, Immanuel, Crítica del juicio, Espasa-Calpe, Madrid, 2001, §15, pp. 161-164
LEDDY, Thomas, The Extraordinary in the Ordinary. The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, Broadview Press, Ontario, 2012, pp. 116-117
IRVIN, Sherry, “Scratching an Itch”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66 (1), 2008, pp. 25-35.
Chris Dowling en “The Aesthetics of Daily Life”, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 50 (3), 2010, pp. 225-242
Richard Shusterman en “Back to the Future: Aesthetics Today”, The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 43 (23), 2012, pp. 104-124.
FORSEY, Jane, The Aesthetics of Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013
LEDDY, Thomas, “Experience of Awe: an Expansive Approach to Everyday Aesthetics”, Contemporary Aesthetics, 13, 2015.
SAITO, Yuriko, Aesthetics of the Familiar. Everyday Life and World-Making, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 11-23.
SAITO, Yuriko, “Everyday Aesthetics and Artification”, Contemporary Aesthetics, 10, 2012.
Kevin Melchionne, “Aesthetic Experience in Everyday Life: A Reply to Dowling”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 51 (4), 2011, pp. 437-442
Glenn Parsons y Allan Carlson, Functional Beauty, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008, pp. 167-195
INFANTE DEL ROSAL, Fernando, La autonomía del diseño. Diseño como categoría estética, Universitat de València, Valencia, 2018, p. 23.
Gillo Dorfles, Introduzione al disegno industriale, Einaudi, Turín, 2001, p. 9.
KIVY, Peter, “Hume’s Neighbour’s Wife: An Essay on the Evolution of Hume’s Aesthetics”, en The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson and Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, p. 287.
TOWNSEND, David, Hume’s Aesthetic Theory, Routledge, Nueva York 2014, pp. 100, 109, 143 y 154.
HUME, David, “Investigación sobre los principios de la moral”, en Investigación sobre el conocimiento humano. Investigación sobre los principios de la moral, Tecnos, Madrid, 2017, p. 335.
HANLEY, R. P., “The Eighteenth-Century Context of Sympathy from Spinoza to Kant”, en Sympathy. A History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015, pp. 171-198
SEOANE, Julio, Del sentido moral a la moral sentimental: el origen sentimental de la identidad y ciudadanía democrática, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 2004, pp. 73-75.
CORTINA, Adela, Ética de la razón cordial. Educar en la ciudadanía en el siglo XXI, Nobel, Oviedo, 2007.
GILLIGAN, Carol, La moral y la teoría. Psicología del desarrollo femenino, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1986
CAMPS, Victoria, Tiempo de cuidados, Arpa y Alfil Editores, Barcelona, 2021, pp. 13 y 75.
BAIER, Annette, “Hume, the Woman’s Moral Theorist?”, en Moral Prejudices. Essays on Ethics, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, 1995, pp. 51-75
HIRSCHMANN, Nancy, “Sympathy, Empathy and Obligation. A Feminist Rereading”, en Feminist Interpretations of David Hume, The Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania, 2000, pp. 174-193.
CONTRERAS PELÁEZ, Francisco J., La filosofía de la historia de Johann G. Herder, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, 2004, p. 114.
SMITH, Adam, La teoría de los sentimientos morales, Alianza, Madrid, 1997, p. 66.
HUSSERL, Edmund, Meditaciones cartesianas, Tecnos, Madrid, 2006, p. 154.
NOWAK, Magdalena, “The Complicated History of Einfühlung”, Argument, 2, 2011, pp. 301-326.
INFANTE DEL ROSAL, Fernando, “Simpatía, naturaleza e identidad en Hume”, Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, 51, 2013, pp. 179-204.
DARWALL, Stephen, “Empathy, Simpathy and Care”, Philosophical Studies, 89 (2), 1998, pp. 261-282
ILYES, Imola, “Empathy in Hume and Smith”, en The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, Routdlege, Londres, 2017, pp. 98-109.
VISCHER, Robert, “Sobre el sentimiento óptico de la forma”, en La imagen superviviente. Historia del arte y tiempo de los fantasmas según Aby Warburg, Abada Editores, Madrid, 2009, p. 372.
STEIN, Edith, Sobre el problema de la empatía, Trotta, Madrid, 2004, pp. 23-24.
SEVENHUIJSEN, Selma, “The place of care. The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy”, Feminist Theory, 4 (2), 2003, pp. 179-197.
Alasdair MacIntyre, Dependent Rational Animals, Duckworth, Londres, 1999.
