Gaps and analogies in the formation of registered capital of limited liability and joint-stock companies

Viktor Mikryukov

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3969.14

Viktor Mikryukov Kutafin Moscow State Law University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-1627

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.14

Palabras clave: analogía en el derecho, lagunas en la legislación, sociedad anónima, sociedad de responsabilidad limitada, capital social

Resumen

El objetivo de la investigación es analizar y, utilizando la analogía, examinar exhaustivamente las áreas de incertidumbre jurídica en el mecanismo de formación del capital social de las entidades comerciales, al tiempo que se comprueba la coherencia de la analogía estatutaria y la analogía en el derecho como un medio universal de protección y lucha contra las lagunas en la esfera empresarial. Se aplicaron una combinación de métodos lógicos generales de análisis y síntesis, inducción y deducción, comparación y generalización, característicos de las obras que tratan del derecho civil. Al mismo tiempo, el método de la analogía se utilizó como instrumento de investigación y como objeto de investigación. Entre las conclusiones de la labor figuran la determinación de lagunas concretas en la reglamentación jurídica del procedimiento, los métodos y las condiciones de pago del capital social, la identificación de formas de superar casualmente esas lagunas y la formulación de propuestas para la actualización legislativa de la estructura reglamentaria del capital social de las sociedades comerciales.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Viktor Mikryukov, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., Moscow, 125993, Russia

Citas

BARAK, Aharon. 2015. Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

BRECT, Paul. 1980. Accommodation of the Majoritarianism and Rights of Human Dignity. P 53, 761.

BYK, Christian. 2014. Human Dignity a Useless Concept? Legal Perspective. In M., Duwell (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives/ P 364.

CAROZZA Paolo G.. 2008. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply. Eur. J. Int`l. L931. City of Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod (1983). Health, 462 U.S. 416, at sec. VII.

DONNELLY, Jack. 1986. “Human Dignity, Human Rights and Political Regimes” In: Am. Pol. Scd. Rev. No. 80, p. 801.

DWORKING, Ronald. 1989. Taking Rights Seriously. In M., Winston (ed.). The philosophy of human rights. Wadsworth Pub Co. UK.

GAJDA – ROSZCZYNIALSKA, Katarzyna. 2019. “Abuse of procedural rights in Polish and European civil procedure law and the notion of private and public interest” In: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. No. 2 (3), pp. 53-85. Available online. In: http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/ att_1560677855.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

GARKICKI, Leszek. 2015. Polskie prawo konstytucyjne: Zaryswykładu. Wolters Kluwer. Warszawa, Poland.

GRANAT, Myroslav. 2016. The value of human dignity in constitutional law. Ukrainian Journal of Constitutional Law 1, 60. Available online. In: http://www.constjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Granat-M.-Znachennya- gidnosti-lyudyny-u-konstytutsijnomu-pravi.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

GRYSHCHUK, Oksana. 2018 Human Dignity in Law: Philosophical and Legal Protection. Human dignity and human rights as the basis of the constitutional system of the state (a collection of abstracts of the International scientific-practical conference “Human dignity and human rights as the basis of the constitutional system of the state”). Khmelnytsky University of Management and Law. Khmelnytsky, Ukraine.

HENNETTEE-VAUCHEZ, Stéphanie. 2014. Human Dignity in French Law. In M., Duwell (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge, UK.

HILL, Thomas E. 2014. Kantian Perspective on the Rational Basis of Human Dignity. In M., Duwell, et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

IZAROVA, Iryna. 2019. Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions. Teise (Law), 111, 234-245. Available online. In: https://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/ view/12828. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

MARITAIN, Jaoques. 1948. Introduction. In Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations – A symposium (UNESCO ed.).

MARITAIN, Jaoques. 1951. Man and the State. Chicago University Press. Chicago, USA.

MAXEINER, James. 2008. “Some Realism About Legal Certainty in the Globalization of the Rule of Law” In: Hous. J. Int`l. L. Vol. 31, p. 26.

PIECHOWIAK, Marek. 2012. Dobro wspólne jako fundament polskiego porządku konstytucyjnego. Tom XІ Studiów i Materiałów Trybunału Konstytucyjnego 2. Biuro Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, pp. 310-494. R. v. KAPP 2 S.C.R. 483 (Can.). Art. 19, 2008. P. 21, 22.

RATZ, Joseph. 1977. “Rule of Law and Its Virtue” In: L.Q. RevP. Vol. 93, pp. 195-220.

RHODA, Howard. 1992. Howard, Dignity, Community, and Human Rights. In A.A., An-Na’im (ed.). Human rights in Crosscultural Perspective: A Request for Concensus. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia, USA.

ROSEN, Michael. 2013. Dignity: The Case Against. In Ch., McCrudden (ed.). Understanding Human Dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Greaty, C. (2013). Socio-Economic Rights, Basic Needs, and Human Dignity: A Perspective from Law’s Front Line. In Ch., McCrudden (ed.). Understanding Human Dignity. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

ROZHNOV, Oleh. Towards Timely Justice in Civil Matters Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2-3, No. 7, pp. 100-114. Available online. In: http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/ att_1599502312.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

SHULTZINER, Doron. 2017. “Human Dignity in Judicial Decisions: Principles of Application and the Rule of Law” In: Cardozo J. Int`l. L. & Comp. L. No. 25, p.435.

SHULTZINER, Doron; RABINOVICI, Itai. 2012. Human Dignity, Self-Worth, and Humiliation: A Comparative Legal-Psychological Approach. Psychol. Pub. Poly & L. 18. P.105 The decision in the case № 216/5339/14-с (2020). Kryvyi Rih District Court of Dnipropetrovsk region. Available online. In: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91624861. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

VEREINIGUNG BILDENDER KUNSTLER v. AUSTRIA App. 2007. No. 68354/01 (ECHR, Spielmann, J. & Jebens, J., dissenting at 9).

WEISSTUB, Honor. 2002. Dignity and the Framing of Multiculturalist Values. In D., Kretzmer, E., Kleineds. The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. Kluwer Law International. New York, USA.