Gaps and analogies in the formation of registered capital of limited liability and joint-stock companies

Keywords: analogy in law, gaps in legislation, joint-stock company, limited liability company, registered capital

Abstract

The aim of the research is to analyses and, using analogy, to examine exhaustively the areas of legal uncertainty in the mechanism of social capital formation of commercial entities, while at the same time checking the coherence of the statutory analogy and the analogy in law as a universal means of protecting and combating gaps in the business sphere. A combination of general logical methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and generalization, characteristic of works dealing with civil law, were applied. At the same time, the analogy method was used as a research tool and as a research tool. The conclusions of the work include the identification of specific gaps in the legal regulation of the procedure, methods, and terms of payment of share capital, the identification of ways to overcome these gaps casually and the formulation of proposals for the legislative updating of the regulatory structure of the share capital of commercial companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Viktor Mikryukov, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., Moscow, 125993, Russia

References

BARAK, Aharon. 2015. Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

BRECT, Paul. 1980. Accommodation of the Majoritarianism and Rights of Human Dignity. P 53, 761.

BYK, Christian. 2014. Human Dignity a Useless Concept? Legal Perspective. In M., Duwell (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives/ P 364.

CAROZZA Paolo G.. 2008. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply. Eur. J. Int`l. L931. City of Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod (1983). Health, 462 U.S. 416, at sec. VII.

DONNELLY, Jack. 1986. “Human Dignity, Human Rights and Political Regimes” In: Am. Pol. Scd. Rev. No. 80, p. 801.

DWORKING, Ronald. 1989. Taking Rights Seriously. In M., Winston (ed.). The philosophy of human rights. Wadsworth Pub Co. UK.

GAJDA – ROSZCZYNIALSKA, Katarzyna. 2019. “Abuse of procedural rights in Polish and European civil procedure law and the notion of private and public interest” In: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. No. 2 (3), pp. 53-85. Available online. In: http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/ att_1560677855.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

GARKICKI, Leszek. 2015. Polskie prawo konstytucyjne: Zaryswykładu. Wolters Kluwer. Warszawa, Poland.

GRANAT, Myroslav. 2016. The value of human dignity in constitutional law. Ukrainian Journal of Constitutional Law 1, 60. Available online. In: http://www.constjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Granat-M.-Znachennya- gidnosti-lyudyny-u-konstytutsijnomu-pravi.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

GRYSHCHUK, Oksana. 2018 Human Dignity in Law: Philosophical and Legal Protection. Human dignity and human rights as the basis of the constitutional system of the state (a collection of abstracts of the International scientific-practical conference “Human dignity and human rights as the basis of the constitutional system of the state”). Khmelnytsky University of Management and Law. Khmelnytsky, Ukraine.

HENNETTEE-VAUCHEZ, Stéphanie. 2014. Human Dignity in French Law. In M., Duwell (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge, UK.

HILL, Thomas E. 2014. Kantian Perspective on the Rational Basis of Human Dignity. In M., Duwell, et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

IZAROVA, Iryna. 2019. Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions. Teise (Law), 111, 234-245. Available online. In: https://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/ view/12828. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

MARITAIN, Jaoques. 1948. Introduction. In Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations – A symposium (UNESCO ed.).

MARITAIN, Jaoques. 1951. Man and the State. Chicago University Press. Chicago, USA.

MAXEINER, James. 2008. “Some Realism About Legal Certainty in the Globalization of the Rule of Law” In: Hous. J. Int`l. L. Vol. 31, p. 26.

PIECHOWIAK, Marek. 2012. Dobro wspólne jako fundament polskiego porządku konstytucyjnego. Tom XІ Studiów i Materiałów Trybunału Konstytucyjnego 2. Biuro Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, pp. 310-494. R. v. KAPP 2 S.C.R. 483 (Can.). Art. 19, 2008. P. 21, 22.

RATZ, Joseph. 1977. “Rule of Law and Its Virtue” In: L.Q. RevP. Vol. 93, pp. 195-220.

RHODA, Howard. 1992. Howard, Dignity, Community, and Human Rights. In A.A., An-Na’im (ed.). Human rights in Crosscultural Perspective: A Request for Concensus. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia, USA.

ROSEN, Michael. 2013. Dignity: The Case Against. In Ch., McCrudden (ed.). Understanding Human Dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Greaty, C. (2013). Socio-Economic Rights, Basic Needs, and Human Dignity: A Perspective from Law’s Front Line. In Ch., McCrudden (ed.). Understanding Human Dignity. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

ROZHNOV, Oleh. Towards Timely Justice in Civil Matters Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2-3, No. 7, pp. 100-114. Available online. In: http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/ att_1599502312.pdf. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

SHULTZINER, Doron. 2017. “Human Dignity in Judicial Decisions: Principles of Application and the Rule of Law” In: Cardozo J. Int`l. L. & Comp. L. No. 25, p.435.

SHULTZINER, Doron; RABINOVICI, Itai. 2012. Human Dignity, Self-Worth, and Humiliation: A Comparative Legal-Psychological Approach. Psychol. Pub. Poly & L. 18. P.105 The decision in the case № 216/5339/14-с (2020). Kryvyi Rih District Court of Dnipropetrovsk region. Available online. In: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91624861. Consultation date: 02/12/2020.

VEREINIGUNG BILDENDER KUNSTLER v. AUSTRIA App. 2007. No. 68354/01 (ECHR, Spielmann, J. & Jebens, J., dissenting at 9).

WEISSTUB, Honor. 2002. Dignity and the Framing of Multiculturalist Values. In D., Kretzmer, E., Kleineds. The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. Kluwer Law International. New York, USA.
Published
2021-07-09
How to Cite
Mikryukov, V. (2021). Gaps and analogies in the formation of registered capital of limited liability and joint-stock companies. Political Questions, 39(69), 237-260. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.14
Section
Derecho Público