Peculiarities of state regulation of intellectual property rights protection

Peculiaridades de la regulación estatal de la protección de los derechos de propiedad intelectual

• Ivan Vashchynets Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6983-6151
• Petro Korniienko National Academy of Statistics, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-6698
• Oksana Kustovska National University of life and environmental sciences of Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-9249
• Zoriana Romanova National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-5758
• Yuliia Sushytska Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-3914

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.06

Keywords: intellectual activity, legal regulation, property and personal non-property rights, innovative activity, objects of intellectual property rights

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that in Ukraine under martial law the system of protection of intellectual property rights and mechanisms of its public administration is continuously transformed, which implies a scientific search to identify the problems that exist in this area and the development of effective practical solutions to overcome them. The purpose of the study was to identify the main features and obstacles arising in the implementation of public administration in the field of intellectual property and the implementation of protection of its objects under martial law in Ukraine. The research methods used were general and special legal methods of knowledge. Everything allows to conclude that there is an urgent need to develop new mechanisms of digital security of copyrights and to push forward the creation of blockchain accounting of copyright objects. Similarly, a revision of the approach to the evaluation of objects of intellectual property rights and the determination of the inventive level is needed, as a condition of possibility to adapt the legislation governing the matter to the needs of today’s society.

References

DAVID, Matthew. 2019. “Consumption and intellectual property” In: The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-4.

DI CATALDO, Vincenzo. 2018. “Goods in transit and trademark law” (and intellectual property law?)” In: IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 436–451.

KODYNETZ, Anatoly; MAIDANYK, Liubov. 2019. “Commercialization of Intellectual Property Rights as Foundation for Innovation” In: Nauka Ta Innovacii. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 91-102.

MEHDIPOUR, Mohammad; BAGHERI, Parviz. 2021. “The franchise agreement in International Trade: Its advantages and disadvantages” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 69, pp. 296–316.

SAMARANAYAKE, Wathsala. 2022. “A critical evaluation of the interface between Intellectual Property Rights and human rights with special emphasis on Indigenous Intellectual Property” In: The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 412–431.

UCHIDA, Hideaki. 2020. “The big push to a knowledge‐based economy with Intellectual Property Rights Protection” In: Review of Development Economics. Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 1551-1559.

UPRETI, Pratyush. 2021. “The role of national and international intellectual property law and policy in reconceptualising the definition of investment” In: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Vol. 52, No. 2, pp.103-136.

WECHS HATANAKA, Asako. 2018. “Optimising mediation for intellectual property law Perspectives from EU, French and UK law” In: IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 384-412.