Concepto y motivos para la adquisición de derechos de propiedad en el derecho civil de la Federación de Rusia

• Svetlana S. Aleeva Russian State University named after A.N. Kosygin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-0540
• Maria Ye. Zhukova Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-4458
• Svetlana A. Ivanova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-569X
• Albina V. Kachmazova Gorsky State Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-0636
• Elena B. Kozlova All-Russian State University of Justice https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-8441

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.31

Keywords: human rights, civil code, property institute, private property, law in Russia

Abstract

The purpose of the article was to study the legal nature, concept, and motives for the acquisition of property rights in Russian civil law. The main method of documentary research. The article also uses the inductive method, the method of systematic scientific analysis, comparative legal methods, and historical methods. The main method underlying the solution of the problem is to study the legal bases and characteristics of the acquisition of property rights. The article demonstrates the theoretical irresolubility of the problem of scientific understanding of the grounds for acquiring property rights in the civil law of Russia and other countries. The authors of the article consider that the interpretation of Russian legal norms on property rights is multidimensional in contrast to the relatively recent past. It is concluded that judicial argumentation has occupied an important place in the modern scientific interpretation of civil law rules on property rights. Both the modern legal state and the constitution were created by interpretation and argumentation, including the rules of the property law institute.

References

ALCHIAN, Armen; DEMSETZ, Harold. 1972. “Production, information costs, and economic organization” In: American Economic Review. Vol. 62. No. 5, pp. 777-795.

ALCHIAN, Armen; DEMSETZ, Harold. 2004. “Production, information costs, and economic organization” In: Istoki [Origins], HSE. Moscow, Russia.

CHIANALE, Antoni. 1990. Obbligazione di dare e trasferimento della proprieta. Milano, Italy.

DER, Duden. 1989. In Banden. Duden Etymologie: Herkunftsworterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Aufl. Mannheim; Wien. Zurich, Suzie.

GRUDTSINA, L; IVANOVA, S.A; KOROTKOVA, M.V; SHEVCHENKO, L.I. 2018. “The information in civil society” In: International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 1652-1663.

GRUDTSINA, L; GALUSHKIN, A.A. 2013. “Questions of modern civil society development in Russian Federation” In: World Applied Sciences Journal. Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 790-793.

SHEVCHENKO, L.I., IVANOVA, S.A., GRUDTSINA, L.Y. 2019. “The legal nature of the reinsurance contract”, In: International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 1603-1611.

SINGER, Рiter. 1993. Practical Ethics Centre for Human Bioethics Monash Univ. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

ANDREEV, P.P. 2005. Correlation of concepts: the welfare state, social protection, social risks, social security. Vladimir, Russia.

PILYUGINA, Natalia Sergeevna. 2009. Anthropological method of cognition of law: theoretical and legal analysis: abstract of a thesis of candidate of legal sciences]. Kuban State University. Krasnodar, Russia.

RYAN, A. 2008. Sobstvennost [Ownership] In: “The Invisible Hand” of the Market, pp. 312-318, J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, Newman P.M. (eds). HSE. Publishing House SU HSE. Moscow, Russia.

BELOV, Vadim Anatolievich. 2011. Collection of teaching materials on civil law: a textbook for universities. Statut. Moscow, Russia.