The substrate of criminal-legal influence
Abstract
The aim of the article is found on the idea of measure as a substrate of criminal-legal influence. The publication proposes to consider the measure as a substrate of external forms of legal influence and criminal-legal measure as a primary element of all external forms of criminal-legal influence (in connection with the commission of a criminal act). The analysis allows us to conclude that the substrate of legal influence is a basic element of socio-legal regulation (which substantively combines a system of techniques and methods of influence used to obtain a positive and socially significant result). It should be understood that a criminal-legal measure is a system of techniques and methods of coercive and rehabilitation-encouraging influence of the state on criminal practices (criminal offenses, objectively illegal acts, abuse of law) and lawful post-criminal behavior, which is carried out by the law, determined by the socio-cultural environment. It is concluded that such ideas of Leonardo Polo as coexistence, the abandonment of mental limit, his thoughts on ethics, knowledge, and law can be applied successfully when the criminal-legal measure is characterized by several features that distinguish it from measures of the legal influence of another industry.
Downloads
References
AQUINAS Thomas. 2020. “Summa Theologiae (I-II, q. 90, a. 4; q. 94, a. 2, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
AQUINAS, Thomas. 2020. “Sententiarum (III, d. 37, q. 1, a. 1; IV, d. 2, q. 1, a. 4, a, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
BERMAN, Harold. 1948. “The Challenge of Soviet Law” In: Harvard Law Review. Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 220–265.
BERMAN, Harold. 1979. “American and Soviet Perspectives on Human Rights” In: Worldview. Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 15-21.
CAMBRONNE, Patrice. 1982. Recherches sur la structure de l'imaginaire dans les confessions de Saint Augustin. Etudes Augustiniennes. Paris, France.
COHEN, Hermann. 2010. Kants Begründung Der Ethik. Nabu Press. Charleston, United States.
ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA. 2017. Nomos. December 08. Available online. In: https://www.britannica.com/topic/nomos-Greek-philosophy. Consultation date: 03/02/2020.
FINNIS, John. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. New York, USA.
FRANQUET, Ma. José. 1996. “Trayectoria intelectual de Leonardo Polo” In: Anuario Filosófico. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 303-322.
GRISHCHUK, Victor K. 2007. Criminal law of Ukraine. Istina. Kyiv, Ukraine.
GUTOROVA, Natalia. 2014. Measures of criminal-legal nature. Measures of criminal-legal influence: problems of normative regulation and efficiency of application. Helveteka Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
HAVRONYUK, Mykola. I. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal influence: what are they?” In: Legal Bulletin of Ukraine. No. 21 (934), pp. 6-9.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1959. Of True Religion. Gateway. Chicago, USA.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1996. Sancti Aurelii Augustini de Doctrina Christiana. De Vera Religione. Brepols. Turnholti, Belgium.
KALMYKOV, Alex A. 2018. “The Problem of Anthropodization in Modern Times. The System of Mass Communications and Media Culture of the Individual” In: European Journal of Philosophical Research. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 31-46.
KANT, Immanuel. 1974. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Martinus Nijhoff. Leiden, Netherlands.
KANT, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant) (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Eds.) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018a. “Leibniz’s Theodicy and Cosmodicy as Preconditions of the Kantian Anthropodicy” In: Collection of Scientific Papers «Gileya: Scientific Herald». Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 167-173. Available online. In: http://gileya.org/index.php?ng=library&cont=long&id=154. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018b. “Kantian Anthropodicy: How to Justify a Human after the Triumph of Theocosmodicy?” In: Integrative Anthropology. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp 16-21. Available online. In: http://anthropology.odmu.edu.ua/?p=4772&lang=en. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHARYTONOV, Evgen; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia; FASII, Bohdan; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2019. “Information Security and Means of Its Legal Support” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. 255-265.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2011. Criminal-legal measures: cultural and anthropological dimension. Ilion. Mykolaiv, Ukraine.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2016. Signs and properties of criminal law measures of coercive and incentive influence. Legal influence on illegal behavior: current aspects. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
KRIZHANOVSKY, Mykola. 2019. “Measures of criminal legal nature for legal entities: prerequisites, grounds and conditions of application” In: Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. No. 1, pp. 232–237.
KULLMANN, Wolfgang. 1991. Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle. In D. Keyt, F.D. Miller Jr. (Eds.). A Companion to Aristotle's Politics (pp. 94–117). Blackwell. Oxford, England.
LOZINSKAYA, Ilona Anatoliyivna. 2014. “On the question of the concept and content of criminal-legal measures” In: Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine. No. 8, pp. 185-192.
MILGRAM, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience” In: Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” In: Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 371-378.
MILLER, Fred. 2017. Aristotle's Political Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/aristotle-politics/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MULGAN, Richard. 1974. “Aristotle's Doctrine That Man Is a Political Animal” In: Hermes. Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 438-445. Available online. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4475868. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MUSYCHENKO, Olga Mykhailivna; KOZACHENKO, Alexander V. 2015. Cultural and anthropological dimension of the justice of criminal-legal influence: world achievements and national heritage. Helvetica Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
O’DONNELL, Robert J. 1992. Augustine: Confessions. Clarendon Press. Oxford, England.
PANOV, Mykola Ivanovych. 2015. “The principle of legal certainty in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the quality problems of the criminal legislation of Ukraine” In: Problems of Legality. No. 128, pp. 8-19.
PIA TARAZONA, Salvador. 1999. La antropología trascendental de Leonardo Polo. Studia poliana. Available online. In: http://www.leonardopolo.net/textos/spiaingl.htm#_ftnref49. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
PIPES, Richard. 2003. Communism: A History. Modern Library. New York, USA.
PIPES, Richard. 2011. Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage. New York, USA.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964a. El acceso al ser. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964b. El derecho de propiedad y la cultura humana. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1984. Curso de Filosofía Política dictado en 1984. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1991. Quién es el hombre. Rialp. Madrid, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2005. “Planteamiento de la antropología transcendental” In: Miscelánea poliana. No. 4, pp. 8–24.
POLO, Leonardo. 2008. Ethics: A Modern Version of Its Classics Themes. Sinag-Tala Publishers. Manila. Makati, Filipinas.
POLO, Leonardo. 2010. Antropología transcendental I: la persona humana (3rd ed.). Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2013. Lecciones de ética. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2015. Why a Transcendental Anthropology? Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. Madrid, España.
PONOMARENKO, Yuriy Anatoliyovych. 2020. “Types of means of criminal law” In: Problems of legality. No. 149, pp. 154-167.
PROVOTOROV, Oleg. 2018. “Legal grounds for the application of criminal-legal measures against legal entities under the laws of Ukraine” In: Science and law enforcement activity. No. 1, pp 284–294.
RIOFRIO, Juan Carlos. 2020. Concepto de derecho y de derecho natural en Leonardo Polo. Pro manuscrito. (“Pro manuscrito” means that it is not published yet).
ROMANOVA, Elena. 2019. “High-profile Criminal Cases in USSR and RSFSR for 95 years from 1920 to 2015 and the Role of Them Lawyers” In: Lawyer Office. No. 30. Available online. In: https://dirksen-lawyer.ru/gromkie-ugolovnie-dela-v-sssr-i-rossii-s-1920-po-2015-god/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
SELLES, Juan Fernando; ESCLANDA, Roderrick. 2015. Leonardo Polo: A Brief Introduction. Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. South Bend, Indiana.
SHYSHKA, Roman; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2020. “The World in 2020: What are the Threats to humanity?” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 26, pp. 3-5.
SONTAG, Frederick. 1981. “Anthropodicy or Theodicy? A Discussion with Becker's “The Structure of Evil” In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 267–274.
SUSSMAN, David G. 2001. The Idea of Humanity. Anthropology and Anthroponomy in Kant’s Ethics. Routledge. London, United Kingdom.
TKALYCH, Maxym; SAFONCHYK, Oksana; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2020. “Derecho privado y derechos humanos: Nuevas realidades.” In: DIXI, Vol. 22(2), pp. 1-12.
VANNEY, Alejandra. 2007. Syndéresis as a natural law in Thomas Aquinas and the knowledge of the first practical principles. A reading from Leonardo Polo. In J. Cruz (Ed.), Natural law and anthropological levels. University of Navarra. Pamplona, España.
VDOVINA, Galyna. 2019. “Leonardo Polo. Project of transcendental anthropology” In: In: History of Philosophy. Vol. 2, No. 21, pp. 147–162.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2011. “Measures of criminal-legal influence on crimes: concepts, conditions of application, and types” In: Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Vol. 2, pp. 124–129.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2012. Non-punitive criminal-legal impact on minors: analytical discourse. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
WALDRON, Jeremy. 2016. The Rule of Law. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/rule-of-law/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
YACK, Bernard. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. University of California Press. California, USA.
YAREMKO, Galyna. 2014. “System of criminal-legal measures” In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 89–96.
YASHCHENKO, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal nature: concept, content and essence” In: Law Forum. No. 3, pp. 775-783.
YASHCHENKО, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2014. Application of measures of criminal-legal nature. NikaNova. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
YEPES STORK, Ricardo. 2006. “Leonardo Polo, su vida y escritos” In: Universidad de Navarra. No. 8, pp. 15-21.
YERMAK, Oleksiy Viktorovych; KUTS, Vitaliy Mykolayovych. 2018. Confiscation as a means of criminal-legal response. Publisher “Lozovy V.M”. Chernihiv, Ukraine.
ZEGARRA, Octavio Vinces. 1991. “Una sociedad poco juridificada inhibe la actividad humana. Entrevista a Leonardo Polo” In: Ius et Veritas. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 22-24.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)