El sustrato de la influencia penal-legal
Palabras clave:
entorno sociocultural, sustrato de influencia criminal-legal, medida penal-legal, métodos de influencia coercitivos e incentivadores, discreción judicial
Resumen
El objeto del artículo se encuentra en la idea de medida como sustrato de influencia penal-legal. La publicación propone considerar la medida como sustrato de formas externas de influencia jurídica y la medida penal-legal como elemento primario de todas las formas externas de influencia penal-legal (en relación con la comisión de un acto delictivo). El análisis permite concluir que el sustrato de la influencia jurídica es un elemento básico de la regulación sociojurídica (que combina sustantivamente un sistema de técnicas y métodos de influencia utilizados para obtener un resultado positivo y socialmente significativo). Debe entenderse que una medida penal-legal es un sistema de técnicas y métodos de influencia coercitiva y de fomento de la rehabilitación del Estado sobre las prácticas delictivas (infracciones penales, actos objetivamente ilegales, abuso de la ley) y conductas posdelictivas lícitas, que se lleva a cabo por la ley, pero determinada por el entorno sociocultural. Se concluye que ideas de Leonardo Polo como la convivencia, el abandono del límite mental, su pensamiento sobre la ética, el conocimiento y el derecho pueden aplicarse con éxito cuando la medida penal-legal se caracteriza por varios rasgos que la distinguen de las medidas de la legalidad.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
ANDROS, Yellem. 2002. “Metaphysical and post-metaphysical era of European humanities: the change of methodological principles and worldviews” In: Collisions of anthropological thinking. Vol. 1, pp. 123-152.
AQUINAS Thomas. 2020. “Summa Theologiae (I-II, q. 90, a. 4; q. 94, a. 2, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
AQUINAS, Thomas. 2020. “Sententiarum (III, d. 37, q. 1, a. 1; IV, d. 2, q. 1, a. 4, a, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
BERMAN, Harold. 1948. “The Challenge of Soviet Law” In: Harvard Law Review. Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 220–265.
BERMAN, Harold. 1979. “American and Soviet Perspectives on Human Rights” In: Worldview. Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 15-21.
CAMBRONNE, Patrice. 1982. Recherches sur la structure de l'imaginaire dans les confessions de Saint Augustin. Etudes Augustiniennes. Paris, France.
COHEN, Hermann. 2010. Kants Begründung Der Ethik. Nabu Press. Charleston, United States.
ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA. 2017. Nomos. December 08. Available online. In: https://www.britannica.com/topic/nomos-Greek-philosophy. Consultation date: 03/02/2020.
FINNIS, John. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. New York, USA.
FRANQUET, Ma. José. 1996. “Trayectoria intelectual de Leonardo Polo” In: Anuario Filosófico. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 303-322.
GRISHCHUK, Victor K. 2007. Criminal law of Ukraine. Istina. Kyiv, Ukraine.
GUTOROVA, Natalia. 2014. Measures of criminal-legal nature. Measures of criminal-legal influence: problems of normative regulation and efficiency of application. Helveteka Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
HAVRONYUK, Mykola. I. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal influence: what are they?” In: Legal Bulletin of Ukraine. No. 21 (934), pp. 6-9.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1959. Of True Religion. Gateway. Chicago, USA.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1996. Sancti Aurelii Augustini de Doctrina Christiana. De Vera Religione. Brepols. Turnholti, Belgium.
KALMYKOV, Alex A. 2018. “The Problem of Anthropodization in Modern Times. The System of Mass Communications and Media Culture of the Individual” In: European Journal of Philosophical Research. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 31-46.
KANT, Immanuel. 1974. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Martinus Nijhoff. Leiden, Netherlands.
KANT, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant) (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Eds.) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018a. “Leibniz’s Theodicy and Cosmodicy as Preconditions of the Kantian Anthropodicy” In: Collection of Scientific Papers «Gileya: Scientific Herald». Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 167-173. Available online. In: http://gileya.org/index.php?ng=library&cont=long&id=154. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018b. “Kantian Anthropodicy: How to Justify a Human after the Triumph of Theocosmodicy?” In: Integrative Anthropology. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp 16-21. Available online. In: http://anthropology.odmu.edu.ua/?p=4772&lang=en. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHARYTONOV, Evgen; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia; FASII, Bohdan; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2019. “Information Security and Means of Its Legal Support” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. 255-265.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2011. Criminal-legal measures: cultural and anthropological dimension. Ilion. Mykolaiv, Ukraine.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2016. Signs and properties of criminal law measures of coercive and incentive influence. Legal influence on illegal behavior: current aspects. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
KRIZHANOVSKY, Mykola. 2019. “Measures of criminal legal nature for legal entities: prerequisites, grounds and conditions of application” In: Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. No. 1, pp. 232–237.
KULLMANN, Wolfgang. 1991. Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle. In D. Keyt, F.D. Miller Jr. (Eds.). A Companion to Aristotle's Politics (pp. 94–117). Blackwell. Oxford, England.
LOZINSKAYA, Ilona Anatoliyivna. 2014. “On the question of the concept and content of criminal-legal measures” In: Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine. No. 8, pp. 185-192.
MILGRAM, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience” In: Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” In: Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 371-378.
MILLER, Fred. 2017. Aristotle's Political Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/aristotle-politics/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MULGAN, Richard. 1974. “Aristotle's Doctrine That Man Is a Political Animal” In: Hermes. Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 438-445. Available online. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4475868. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MUSYCHENKO, Olga Mykhailivna; KOZACHENKO, Alexander V. 2015. Cultural and anthropological dimension of the justice of criminal-legal influence: world achievements and national heritage. Helvetica Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
O’DONNELL, Robert J. 1992. Augustine: Confessions. Clarendon Press. Oxford, England.
PANOV, Mykola Ivanovych. 2015. “The principle of legal certainty in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the quality problems of the criminal legislation of Ukraine” In: Problems of Legality. No. 128, pp. 8-19.
PIA TARAZONA, Salvador. 1999. La antropología trascendental de Leonardo Polo. Studia poliana. Available online. In: http://www.leonardopolo.net/textos/spiaingl.htm#_ftnref49. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
PIPES, Richard. 2003. Communism: A History. Modern Library. New York, USA.
PIPES, Richard. 2011. Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage. New York, USA.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964a. El acceso al ser. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964b. El derecho de propiedad y la cultura humana. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1984. Curso de Filosofía Política dictado en 1984. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1991. Quién es el hombre. Rialp. Madrid, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2005. “Planteamiento de la antropología transcendental” In: Miscelánea poliana. No. 4, pp. 8–24.
POLO, Leonardo. 2008. Ethics: A Modern Version of Its Classics Themes. Sinag-Tala Publishers. Manila. Makati, Filipinas.
POLO, Leonardo. 2010. Antropología transcendental I: la persona humana (3rd ed.). Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2013. Lecciones de ética. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2015. Why a Transcendental Anthropology? Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. Madrid, España.
PONOMARENKO, Yuriy Anatoliyovych. 2020. “Types of means of criminal law” In: Problems of legality. No. 149, pp. 154-167.
PROVOTOROV, Oleg. 2018. “Legal grounds for the application of criminal-legal measures against legal entities under the laws of Ukraine” In: Science and law enforcement activity. No. 1, pp 284–294.
RIOFRIO, Juan Carlos. 2020. Concepto de derecho y de derecho natural en Leonardo Polo. Pro manuscrito. (“Pro manuscrito” means that it is not published yet).
ROMANOVA, Elena. 2019. “High-profile Criminal Cases in USSR and RSFSR for 95 years from 1920 to 2015 and the Role of Them Lawyers” In: Lawyer Office. No. 30. Available online. In: https://dirksen-lawyer.ru/gromkie-ugolovnie-dela-v-sssr-i-rossii-s-1920-po-2015-god/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
SELLES, Juan Fernando; ESCLANDA, Roderrick. 2015. Leonardo Polo: A Brief Introduction. Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. South Bend, Indiana.
SHYSHKA, Roman; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2020. “The World in 2020: What are the Threats to humanity?” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 26, pp. 3-5.
SONTAG, Frederick. 1981. “Anthropodicy or Theodicy? A Discussion with Becker's “The Structure of Evil” In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 267–274.
SUSSMAN, David G. 2001. The Idea of Humanity. Anthropology and Anthroponomy in Kant’s Ethics. Routledge. London, United Kingdom.
TKALYCH, Maxym; SAFONCHYK, Oksana; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2020. “Derecho privado y derechos humanos: Nuevas realidades.” In: DIXI, Vol. 22(2), pp. 1-12.
VANNEY, Alejandra. 2007. Syndéresis as a natural law in Thomas Aquinas and the knowledge of the first practical principles. A reading from Leonardo Polo. In J. Cruz (Ed.), Natural law and anthropological levels. University of Navarra. Pamplona, España.
VDOVINA, Galyna. 2019. “Leonardo Polo. Project of transcendental anthropology” In: In: History of Philosophy. Vol. 2, No. 21, pp. 147–162.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2011. “Measures of criminal-legal influence on crimes: concepts, conditions of application, and types” In: Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Vol. 2, pp. 124–129.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2012. Non-punitive criminal-legal impact on minors: analytical discourse. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
WALDRON, Jeremy. 2016. The Rule of Law. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/rule-of-law/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
YACK, Bernard. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. University of California Press. California, USA.
YAREMKO, Galyna. 2014. “System of criminal-legal measures” In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 89–96.
YASHCHENKO, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal nature: concept, content and essence” In: Law Forum. No. 3, pp. 775-783.
YASHCHENKО, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2014. Application of measures of criminal-legal nature. NikaNova. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
YEPES STORK, Ricardo. 2006. “Leonardo Polo, su vida y escritos” In: Universidad de Navarra. No. 8, pp. 15-21.
YERMAK, Oleksiy Viktorovych; KUTS, Vitaliy Mykolayovych. 2018. Confiscation as a means of criminal-legal response. Publisher “Lozovy V.M”. Chernihiv, Ukraine.
ZEGARRA, Octavio Vinces. 1991. “Una sociedad poco juridificada inhibe la actividad humana. Entrevista a Leonardo Polo” In: Ius et Veritas. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 22-24.
AQUINAS Thomas. 2020. “Summa Theologiae (I-II, q. 90, a. 4; q. 94, a. 2, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
AQUINAS, Thomas. 2020. “Sententiarum (III, d. 37, q. 1, a. 1; IV, d. 2, q. 1, a. 4, a, ad 2)”. Available online. In: https://aquinas-in-english.neocities.org/. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
BERMAN, Harold. 1948. “The Challenge of Soviet Law” In: Harvard Law Review. Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 220–265.
BERMAN, Harold. 1979. “American and Soviet Perspectives on Human Rights” In: Worldview. Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 15-21.
CAMBRONNE, Patrice. 1982. Recherches sur la structure de l'imaginaire dans les confessions de Saint Augustin. Etudes Augustiniennes. Paris, France.
COHEN, Hermann. 2010. Kants Begründung Der Ethik. Nabu Press. Charleston, United States.
ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA. 2017. Nomos. December 08. Available online. In: https://www.britannica.com/topic/nomos-Greek-philosophy. Consultation date: 03/02/2020.
FINNIS, John. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. New York, USA.
FRANQUET, Ma. José. 1996. “Trayectoria intelectual de Leonardo Polo” In: Anuario Filosófico. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 303-322.
GRISHCHUK, Victor K. 2007. Criminal law of Ukraine. Istina. Kyiv, Ukraine.
GUTOROVA, Natalia. 2014. Measures of criminal-legal nature. Measures of criminal-legal influence: problems of normative regulation and efficiency of application. Helveteka Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
HAVRONYUK, Mykola. I. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal influence: what are they?” In: Legal Bulletin of Ukraine. No. 21 (934), pp. 6-9.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1959. Of True Religion. Gateway. Chicago, USA.
HIPPO OF, Augustine. 1996. Sancti Aurelii Augustini de Doctrina Christiana. De Vera Religione. Brepols. Turnholti, Belgium.
KALMYKOV, Alex A. 2018. “The Problem of Anthropodization in Modern Times. The System of Mass Communications and Media Culture of the Individual” In: European Journal of Philosophical Research. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 31-46.
KANT, Immanuel. 1974. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Martinus Nijhoff. Leiden, Netherlands.
KANT, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant) (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Eds.) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018a. “Leibniz’s Theodicy and Cosmodicy as Preconditions of the Kantian Anthropodicy” In: Collection of Scientific Papers «Gileya: Scientific Herald». Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 167-173. Available online. In: http://gileya.org/index.php?ng=library&cont=long&id=154. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHANZHY, Vladimir B. 2018b. “Kantian Anthropodicy: How to Justify a Human after the Triumph of Theocosmodicy?” In: Integrative Anthropology. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp 16-21. Available online. In: http://anthropology.odmu.edu.ua/?p=4772&lang=en. Consultation date: 05/02/2020.
KHARYTONOV, Evgen; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia; FASII, Bohdan; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2019. “Information Security and Means of Its Legal Support” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. 255-265.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2011. Criminal-legal measures: cultural and anthropological dimension. Ilion. Mykolaiv, Ukraine.
KOZACHENKO, Oleksandr. 2016. Signs and properties of criminal law measures of coercive and incentive influence. Legal influence on illegal behavior: current aspects. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
KRIZHANOVSKY, Mykola. 2019. “Measures of criminal legal nature for legal entities: prerequisites, grounds and conditions of application” In: Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. No. 1, pp. 232–237.
KULLMANN, Wolfgang. 1991. Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle. In D. Keyt, F.D. Miller Jr. (Eds.). A Companion to Aristotle's Politics (pp. 94–117). Blackwell. Oxford, England.
LOZINSKAYA, Ilona Anatoliyivna. 2014. “On the question of the concept and content of criminal-legal measures” In: Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine. No. 8, pp. 185-192.
MILGRAM, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience” In: Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” In: Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 371-378.
MILLER, Fred. 2017. Aristotle's Political Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/aristotle-politics/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MULGAN, Richard. 1974. “Aristotle's Doctrine That Man Is a Political Animal” In: Hermes. Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 438-445. Available online. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4475868. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
MUSYCHENKO, Olga Mykhailivna; KOZACHENKO, Alexander V. 2015. Cultural and anthropological dimension of the justice of criminal-legal influence: world achievements and national heritage. Helvetica Publishing House. Odessa, Ukraine.
O’DONNELL, Robert J. 1992. Augustine: Confessions. Clarendon Press. Oxford, England.
PANOV, Mykola Ivanovych. 2015. “The principle of legal certainty in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the quality problems of the criminal legislation of Ukraine” In: Problems of Legality. No. 128, pp. 8-19.
PIA TARAZONA, Salvador. 1999. La antropología trascendental de Leonardo Polo. Studia poliana. Available online. In: http://www.leonardopolo.net/textos/spiaingl.htm#_ftnref49. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
PIPES, Richard. 2003. Communism: A History. Modern Library. New York, USA.
PIPES, Richard. 2011. Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage. New York, USA.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964a. El acceso al ser. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 1964b. El derecho de propiedad y la cultura humana. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1984. Curso de Filosofía Política dictado en 1984. En Castillo, G., & Zorroza, M.I. (Eds.). Libro de política, derecho, cultura y arte. Castello di Urio, Italia.
POLO, Leonardo. 1991. Quién es el hombre. Rialp. Madrid, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2005. “Planteamiento de la antropología transcendental” In: Miscelánea poliana. No. 4, pp. 8–24.
POLO, Leonardo. 2008. Ethics: A Modern Version of Its Classics Themes. Sinag-Tala Publishers. Manila. Makati, Filipinas.
POLO, Leonardo. 2010. Antropología transcendental I: la persona humana (3rd ed.). Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2013. Lecciones de ética. Eunsa. Pamplona, España.
POLO, Leonardo. 2015. Why a Transcendental Anthropology? Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. Madrid, España.
PONOMARENKO, Yuriy Anatoliyovych. 2020. “Types of means of criminal law” In: Problems of legality. No. 149, pp. 154-167.
PROVOTOROV, Oleg. 2018. “Legal grounds for the application of criminal-legal measures against legal entities under the laws of Ukraine” In: Science and law enforcement activity. No. 1, pp 284–294.
RIOFRIO, Juan Carlos. 2020. Concepto de derecho y de derecho natural en Leonardo Polo. Pro manuscrito. (“Pro manuscrito” means that it is not published yet).
ROMANOVA, Elena. 2019. “High-profile Criminal Cases in USSR and RSFSR for 95 years from 1920 to 2015 and the Role of Them Lawyers” In: Lawyer Office. No. 30. Available online. In: https://dirksen-lawyer.ru/gromkie-ugolovnie-dela-v-sssr-i-rossii-s-1920-po-2015-god/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
SELLES, Juan Fernando; ESCLANDA, Roderrick. 2015. Leonardo Polo: A Brief Introduction. Leonardo Polo Institute of Philosophy Press. South Bend, Indiana.
SHYSHKA, Roman; TKALYCH, Maxym. 2020. “The World in 2020: What are the Threats to humanity?” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 26, pp. 3-5.
SONTAG, Frederick. 1981. “Anthropodicy or Theodicy? A Discussion with Becker's “The Structure of Evil” In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 267–274.
SUSSMAN, David G. 2001. The Idea of Humanity. Anthropology and Anthroponomy in Kant’s Ethics. Routledge. London, United Kingdom.
TKALYCH, Maxym; SAFONCHYK, Oksana; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2020. “Derecho privado y derechos humanos: Nuevas realidades.” In: DIXI, Vol. 22(2), pp. 1-12.
VANNEY, Alejandra. 2007. Syndéresis as a natural law in Thomas Aquinas and the knowledge of the first practical principles. A reading from Leonardo Polo. In J. Cruz (Ed.), Natural law and anthropological levels. University of Navarra. Pamplona, España.
VDOVINA, Galyna. 2019. “Leonardo Polo. Project of transcendental anthropology” In: In: History of Philosophy. Vol. 2, No. 21, pp. 147–162.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2011. “Measures of criminal-legal influence on crimes: concepts, conditions of application, and types” In: Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Vol. 2, pp. 124–129.
VECHEROVA, Evgenia. 2012. Non-punitive criminal-legal impact on minors: analytical discourse. Ilion. Nikolaev, Ukraine.
WALDRON, Jeremy. 2016. The Rule of Law. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online. In: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/rule-of-law/. Consultation date: 10/02/2020.
YACK, Bernard. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. University of California Press. California, USA.
YAREMKO, Galyna. 2014. “System of criminal-legal measures” In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 89–96.
YASHCHENKO, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2013. “Measures of criminal-legal nature: concept, content and essence” In: Law Forum. No. 3, pp. 775-783.
YASHCHENKО, Andrii Mykolaiovych. 2014. Application of measures of criminal-legal nature. NikaNova. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
YEPES STORK, Ricardo. 2006. “Leonardo Polo, su vida y escritos” In: Universidad de Navarra. No. 8, pp. 15-21.
YERMAK, Oleksiy Viktorovych; KUTS, Vitaliy Mykolayovych. 2018. Confiscation as a means of criminal-legal response. Publisher “Lozovy V.M”. Chernihiv, Ukraine.
ZEGARRA, Octavio Vinces. 1991. “Una sociedad poco juridificada inhibe la actividad humana. Entrevista a Leonardo Polo” In: Ius et Veritas. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 22-24.
Publicado
2021-03-07
Cómo citar
Kozachenko, O., Sotula, O., Biblenko, V., Giulyakov, K., & Bereznikov, O. (2021). El sustrato de la influencia penal-legal. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(68), 441-462. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/35427
Sección
Derecho Público
Copyright
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación donde se presenta el artículo, el cual se publica bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite a otros compartir el trabajo previo el reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
