Practicality, support or premeditated calculation in the digital age: the case of Ecuador
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the attitudes among young Ecuadorians with regard to processes of technological practicality. It seeks to identify the turning points in the decision-making process regarding the transfer of data and to examine the associated conceptual debate surrounding the role of related participants, such as governments, supranational organizations, transnational companies and end-users. Interviews were conducted with 299 university students in the city of Ambato, Ecuador, using quantitative techniques. The participants stated that they were aware of practicality but not of its effects and limitations, indicating that not everyone would be willing to give up part of their privacy in return for benefits in frequently used applications such as Facebook, WhatsApp or Netflix. Generally, participants felt dominated by technology, which often masks the processes of dependency associated with the costs and custody of data surrendered in exchange for a benefit. Issues of fairness and security in the treatment of data and the uneven coverage of services highlight a need for greater regulation of technological platforms.
References
Barassi, V. (2020). Veronica Barassi: “La primera generación de personas datificadas antes de nacer ya ha llegado”. https://www.elsaltodiario.com/big-data/veronica-barassi-la-primera-generacion-de-personas-que-generan-datos-antes-de-nacer-ha-llegado
Berardi, F. (2015). And: Phenomenology of the End: Sensibility and Connective Mutation. Semiotext.
Bermúdez, M. (2017). Derechos Digitales. Retrieved from Derechos Humanos y Tecnología en America Latina. https://www.derechosdigitales.org
Boutang, P. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. Ed Emery Polity.
BSA. (2018). Gestión de software: un imperativo de seguridad y una oportunidad de Negocio. Washington: BSA The software alliance. https://ww2.bsa.org/~/media/Files/StudiesDownload/2018_BSA_GSS_Report_es.pdf
Businessinsider. (2016). 10 million self-driving cars will be on the road by 2020. http://www.businessinsider.com/report-10-million-self-driving-cars-will-be-on-the-road-by-2020-2015-5-6
Chen, C.L. Philip, Zhang, C.-Y. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data. Information Sciences, 275, 314–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015
Cohen, D. (2015). What the Google books victory means for readers. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/what-the-google-books-victory-means-for-readers-and-libraries/411910/
del Pino, C. & Galán, E. (2010). Internet y los nuevos consumidores: el nuevo modelo publicitario. Philpapers.
Elgendy, N., Elragal, A. (2014). Big Data Analytics: A Literature Review Paper. In Perner P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects. ICDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8557. Springer, Cham. 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08976-8_16
European Commission. (2020). The Digital Markets Act: ensuring fair and open digital markets. https://bit.ly/2Kklqcr
European Union. (2019). Data protection under GDPR. https://bit.ly/38c5XTE
European Union Law. (24 de 10 de 1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A31995L0046
European Union Law. (27 de 04 de 2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: is there no alternative? Zero Books.
Fombona, J., Pascual, M. & Madeira, M. (2012). Realidad aumentada, una evolución de las aplicaciones de los dispositivos móviles. Revista Medios y Educación, 41, 197-210. ISSN: 1133-8482
Forrester. (02 de 11 de 2017). Predictions 2017: Artificial Intelligence Will Drive The Insights Revolution. https://bit.ly/2KxaNTJ
Fortune. (2016). Blockchain Will Be Used By 15% of Big Banks By 2017. http://fortune.com/2016/09/28/blockchain-banks-2017/
Frey, C. & Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Gu, T., Dolan-Gavitt, B. & Garg, S. (2017). Badnets: Identifying vulnerabilities in the machine learning model supply chain. arXiv, 1-13. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.06733.pdf
Hache, A. (2014). Soberania tecnológica. https://www.plateforme-echange.org/IMG/pdf/dossier-st-cast-2014-06-30.pdf
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Harvard University Press Mass.
Hernández, P., Fernández, W. & Baptista, A. (2009). Metodología de la investigación. Antares.
Hernández Zubizarreta, J. & Ramiro, P. (2016). Contra la Lex Mercatoria. Icaria.
Hui, Y. (2020). Fragmentar el futuro. Ensayos sobre tecnodiversidad. Caja Negra.
Internetworldstats. (2018). Estimaciones del uso de internet y estadísticas de población mundial. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.html
Jameson, F. (1992). Postmodernism: or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Verso Books.
Juárez, O., Arango, E. & de la Cruz, J., (2019). Effect of I&D investment on the market value of technology companies. Revista Espacios, 40(24).
Lapowsky, I. (2018). Facebook Exposed 87 Million Users to Cambridge Analytica. https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-exposed-87-million-users-to-cambridge-analytica/
Lovink, G. (2019). Tristes por diseño: las redes sociales como ideología. Consonni.
Luque, A, Macías, J. & Casado, F. (2021). La democracia de los trolls y el asalto a la democracia. Análisis del proceso electoral en Ecuador y los elementos irradiadores que lo conforman a través de sus redes sociales. Cuenca: Editorial Centro de Estudios Sociales de América Latina (CES-AL).
Luque, A., Maniglio F., Casado, F. & García-Guerrero, J. (2020). Transmedia Context and Twitter as conditioning the Ecuadorian Government’s Action. The Case of the Guayaquil Emergency During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Revista Trípodos, 47(2), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.47p47-68
Luque, A. & Casado, F. (2020). Public Strategy and Eco-Social Engagement in Latin American States: An Analysis of Complex Networks Arising from Their Constitutions, 12(20), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208558
Luque, A. (2018). Corruption in the transnational textile industry: an exception or the rule? Empresa y Humanismo, 21(2), 123-184. https://doi.org/10.15581/015.XXI.2.123-184
Luque, A. (2017). Promotion of transnational textile hyper-consumption: fashion and excess as leitmotif. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 134, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i134
Madakam, S., Ramaswamy, R. & Tripathi, S. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT): A literature review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3(5), 164-173. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2015.35021
Mason, P. (2016). Poscapitalismo: Hacia un nuevo futuro. Paidós.
Mckinsey. (2015). Automotive revolution – perspective towards 2030. Retrieved from https://mck.co/37GzHsB
Molina, C. (2019). César Antonio Molina: “El nacionalismo ha envenenado al PSOE”. Retrieved from https://www.elconfidencial.com/cultura/2019-05-24/cesar-antonio-molina-las-democracias-suicidas-entrevista_2018494/
Morozov, E. (2015). La locura del del solucionismo tecnológico. KATZ.
Morozov, E. (2017). To tackle Google’s power, regulators have to go after its ownership of data. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/01/google-european-commission-fine-search-engines
Moya, E., Altamirano, J., Gualotuña, D. & Fabara, M. (2016). Las tecnologías en el mejoramiento de los procesos educativos en la Educación. Journal Publicando, 4, 11(1).
Ovum. (2016). 2017 Trends to Watch: Big Data. https://www.ovum.com/2017-trends-watch-big-data/
Pohlmann, T., Blind, K. & Heß, P. (2020). Fact finding study on patents declared to the 5G standard. https://bit.ly/3nHXxKo
PwC. (2017). Sizing the prize What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise? www.pwc.com/AI. https://pwc.to/2LVGN45
Reicheld, E. (1993). Loyalty-based management. Harvard Business Review, 71, 64-73.
Seymour, R. (2020). The twittering machine. Akal.
Shirley, M., Irving, K., Sanalan, V., Pape, S. & Owens, D. (2011). The practicality of implementing connected classroom technology in secondary mathematics and science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9251-2
Sierra, F. & Maniglio, F. (2016). Capitalismo financiero y comunicación. Ciespal.
Standing, G. (2013). El precariado. Pasado y presente.
Sulleyman, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence can secretly be trained to behave ‘maliciously’ and cause accidents. https://bit.ly/37FfxPV
Taplin, J. (2017). El académico que cree que hay que terminar con el “monopolio de Google” (y hacerlo rápido). https://nyti.ms/2WD49hh
Turkle, S. (2017). How computers change the way we think. In Law and Society Approaches to Cyberspace. Chronicle of Higher Education, 26, 1-5.
Wagner, D. (2014). The importance of big data analytics in business. October, World of tech. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nDTj6p
Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
Wu, T. (2016). The attention Merchants: The Epic Struggle to Get Inside Our Heads. Penguin Random House Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.