Systems of Advocates’ Self-Governance Bodies in European Union Countries

Sistemas de órganos de autogestión de los abogados en los países de la Unión Europea

Palabras clave: actividad de autogobierno, órganos de defensa, Estados miembros de la UE, modelo de autogobierno, monopolio de abogados

Resumen

El propósito del artículo fue estudiar la experiencia de autogobierno de los abogados en los países de la Unión Europea EU. Sobre la base de este material se proporcionan recomendaciones destinadas a mejorar el sistema de defensa. La consecución del objetivo fijados implicó la resolución de las siguientes tareas: a) revelar el mecanismo de funcionamiento del sistema de autogobierno de los abogados en los países de la UE e identificar sus características universales, y; b) determinar los principales modelos del sistema de autogobierno de los abogados en los países de la UE. El ámbito del estudio lo constituyeron las normas públicas, reguladas por la ley, que surgen en la prestación de servicios jurídicos en la aplicación de la abogacía y la aplicación por los representantes de sus órganos del derecho al autogobierno. La base metodológica del estudio consiste en métodos de investigación generales y específicos. Se concluye que, la manifestación del principio de independencia de la profesión de abogado y la garantía del pleno funcionamiento de los órganos de autogobierno de los colegios de abogados en los países de la UE, consiste en garantizar la libertad de sus actividades dentro de la legalidad y su aplicación en la práctica.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Svitlana Kovtun, Lviv University of Business and Law, Ukraine.

Lecturer of the Department of judiciary, prosecution and advocacy Higher education institution «Lviv University of Business and Law» Department of judiciary, prosecution and advocacy 79021, Ukraine, Lviv, Kulparkivska street, 99, phone: (097) 097 60 01; (032) 292-87-08. 

 

Ilya Shutak , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.

Phd in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Professor Institution of higher education «King Danylo University» Ivano-Frankivsk City, Ukraine.

Solomiya Denys, Ivan Franko National Univetsity of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine. 

PhD (Law), Lecturer, Ivan Franko National Univetsity of Lviv, 19 Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., Lviv, 79007, Ukraine. 

 

Yurii Semchuk , Lviv University of Business and Law. Ukraine.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Judiciary, Prosecution and Advocacy, Lviv University of Business and Law. Ukraine.

Citas

BECK, Uliana. 2022. “Advocate self-government bodies in the system of public government bodies: Concepts and functions” In: Uzhhorod National University Herald, Series: Law. Vol. 68, pp. 118-123.

BOCHULYAK, Nazar. 2019. Lawyers and social networks: ethical and professional aspects of correlation. In: Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law. Vol. 23, pp. 111-115. Available online. In: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 3678765. Consultation date: 28/07/2022.

BONI-LE GOFF, Isabel; LEPINARD, Eléonore; LEFEUVRE, Nicky; MALLARD, Grégoire. 2020. “A case of love and hate: Four faces of alienation among young lawyers in France and Switzerland” In: Law & Social Inquiry. Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 279-303.

BOSAK, Janine; KULICH, Clara; RUDMAN, Laurie; KINAHAN, Mary. 2018. “Be an advocate for others, unless you are a man: Backlash against gender- atypical male job candidates” In: Psychology of Men & Masculinity. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 156-165.

CONGRESS OF LAWYERS OF UKRAINE. 2017. The Rules of the Lawyers’ Ethics. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/ n0001891-17#Text. Consultation date: 28/09/2022.

CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE. 1996. No. 254k/96-VR. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр. Consultation date: 28/07/2022.

COUNCIL OF BARS AND LAW SOCIETIES OF EUROPE. 1988. Code of Conduct for European Lawyers. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_343#Text. Consultation date: 28/07/2022.

COURVOISIER, Julie. 2017. “Procedural changes in Switzerland: The lawyer goes into the interrogation room” In: Journal of Forensic Practice. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 2-13.

ELIOT, Lancer. 2021. “The role of Attorney Associates is changing due to AI in the law” In: SSRN Electronic Journal. Available online. In: https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3995615. Consultation date: 03/09/2022.

FRIETSCH,Rainer;NEUHAUSLER,Peter.2019.“Theroleofthepatentattorney in the filing process” In: Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 02511-3_35. Consultation date: 03/09/2022.

GANNER, Michael. 2015. “Enduring Power of Attorney (EPoA) – comparison between Austrian and German Law” Available online. In: https://doi. org/10.25364/1.2:2015.1.3. Consultation date: 28/07/2022.

HAMM, Brandon; ESPLIN, Bryn, S. 2018. “The boundaries of «Good behavior» and judicial competence: Exploring responsibilities and authority limitations of cognitive specialists in the regulation of incapacitated judges” In: Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 514- 520.

HELGESSON, Karin; MORTH, Ulika. 2018. “Client privilege, compliance and the rule of law: Swedish lawyers and money laundering prevention” In: Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 227-248.

LAW OF UKRAINE. 2013. On Advocacy and Advocacy Activity. № 5076-VI. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076- 17#Text. Consultation date: 28/09/2022.

O’DONOVAN, Уrla. 2020. “The pandemic, patient advocacy, and the importance of thinking comment on «The rise of the consucrat” In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Available online. In: https:// doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.114. Consultation date: 28/09/2022.

PASHA, Asgarova, 2022. “Criminal Procedure and Forensic Aspects of Mutual Legal Assistance between States in Criminal Matters: Experience of Ukraine and the Republic of Azerbaijan: Procedural and Forensic Aspects of Mutual Legal Assistance between States in Criminal Matters: The Experience of Ukraine and the Republic of Azerbaijan” In: Political Issues. Vol. 40, No. 72.

POGOSIAN, Marharyta; HORODETSKA, Maryna; VESELOV, Mykola; PYLYPENKO, Dmytro; BANCHUK-PETROSOVA, Olena. 2021. “The role of a lawyer’s request as a means of legal communication in the field of Human Rights Advocacy” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 465-484.

RASMUSSEN, Anne; MADER, Lars; REHER, Stefanie. 2017. “With a little help from the people? the role of public opinion in advocacy success” In: Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 139–164.

REED, Krystia. 2020. “The experience of a legal career: Attorneys’ impact on the system and the system’s impact on attorneys” In: Annual Review of Law and Social Science. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 385-404. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051120-014122. Consultation date: 28/09/2022.
Publicado
2022-12-19
Cómo citar
Kovtun, S., Shutak , I., Denys, S., & Semchuk , Y. (2022). Systems of Advocates’ Self-Governance Bodies in European Union Countries: Sistemas de órganos de autogestión de los abogados en los países de la Unión Europea. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(75), 603-614. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.36
Sección
Derecho Público