Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies in the Context of the Introduction of Innovative Technologies (Comparative Legal Aspect):

Valentyn S.  Tulinov; Iryna V.  Bilykh; Olga M.  Merdova; Olena O.  Volobuieva; Mykola Y.  Veselov

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.4072.08

Valentyn S. Tulinov Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-348X
Iryna V. Bilykh Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-9551
Olga M. Merdova Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-2364
Olena O. Volobuieva Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-4344
Mykola Y. Veselov Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-2764

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.08

Palabras clave: tecnologías innovadoras, aplicación de la ley, implementación e innovaciones, tecnologías modernas, legislación posmoderna

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio fue determinar los mecanismos legales para el uso de tecnologías innovadoras en la aplicación de la ley y esbozar los principales problemas de su implementación en la lucha contra la delincuencia. El esquema metodológico del artículo fue el uso de métodos de investigación teóricos y empíricos, así como métodos comparativos, estructurales y lógicos, documentales y análisis de sistemas. Se establece que los principales tipos de tecnologías modernas utilizadas en la aplicación de la ley son: vehículos aéreos no tripulados, inteligencia artificial, robótica, biotecnología, sistemas de información analítica y de información geográfica, localizadores de explosiones y chatbots. Se encontró que los problemas de introducir tecnologías innovadoras en la aplicación de la ley son objetivos y subjetivos. Se ofrecen las formas de su superación mediante la creación de mecanismos legales para el uso legal de diversas tecnologías modernas por parte de los agentes del orden. Se concluye que los mecanismos eficaces para el uso de las innovaciones en materia de aplicación de la ley aumentarán la eficacia de la prevención del delito y permitirán a los agentes del orden evitar conflictos relacionados con las violaciones de los derechos de los ciudadanos y la protección de la seguridad nacional.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Valentyn S. Tulinov, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Dean of the Faculty no. 2, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, 87554, Mariupol, Ukraine.

Iryna V. Bilykh, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine.

Adjunct, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, 65014, Odesa, Ukraine.

Olga M. Merdova, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Head of the Department of Administrative and Legal Disciplines, Faculty no. 2, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, 87554, Mariupol, Ukraine.

Olena O. Volobuieva, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Mariupol, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Dean of the Faculty no. 1, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, 87554, Mariupol, Ukraine.

Mykola Y. Veselov, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.

Doctor of Law, Professor at the Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Faculty no. 2, Kryvyi Rih Educational and Scientific Institute of Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, 50065, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.

Citas

AKHMETOV, Artem; BEKISHEVA, Svitlana; SYRBU, Anton; KAINAZAROVA, Dana. 2018. “Retrospective review of information technologies in the criminal code of Kazakhstan” In: Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 1545–1550.

BENTON, Martin; NEWHALL, Robert. 2016. Technology and the Guilty Mind: When Do Technology Providers Become Criminal Accomplices? Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2393484. Consultation date: 17/10/2021.

CATH, Corinne. 2018. “Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges” In: Philosophical Transactions of the royal society A. Vol.376, No. 2133, pp. 1-8.

CONGRESS. GOV. 2000. Stevenson–Wydler technology Innovation act of 1980. Available online. In: https://www.congress.gov/96/statute/ STATUTE-94/STATUTE-94-Pg2311.pdf. Consultation date: 11/10/2021.

CONGRESS. GOV. 2006. Small business innovation development act of 1982. Available online. In: https://www.congress.gov/97/statute/ STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg217.pdf. Consultation date: 15/10/2021.

CONGRESS. GOV. 2010. National Science and Technology policy, organization and priorities act of 1976. Available online. In: https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/STATUTE-90/pdf/STATUTE-90-Pg459.pdf#page=14. Consultation date: 14/10/2021.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. 2001. Convention on Cybercrime. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/1680081561. Consultation date: 18/10/2021.

CRACKNELL, Arthur. 2017. “Unmanned aerial vehicles for environmental applications” In: International Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 38. No. 8-10, pp. 3054-3067.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2019a. Europe 2020 Strategy. Available online. In: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/what/glossary/e/ europe-2020-strategy. Consultation date: 17/10/2021.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2019b. A Sustainable Europe by 2030. Available online. In: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/reflection-paper- towards-sustainable-europe-2030_en. Consultation date: 14/10/2021.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2020a. Horizon 2020. Available online. In: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/home. Consultation date: 19/10/2021.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2020b. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence- A European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels, 19.02.2020. Available online. In: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/ commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf. Consultation date: 15/10/2021.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. 2010. The Lisbon Strategy 2000–2010. Available online. In: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/ cont/201107/20110718ATT24270/20110718ATT24270EN.pdf.
Consultation date: 16/10/2021.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. 2020. European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (2020/2014(INL)). Available online. In: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9- 2020-0276_EN.html. Consultation date: 13/10/2021.

GOVTRACK. 2008. The Bayh–Dole Act or Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act. Pub. L. 96-517, December 12, 1980. Available online. In: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/96/hr6933. Consultation date: 17/10/2021.

HENDRIX, Joshua; TANIGUCHI, Travis; STROM, Kevin; AAGAARD, Brian; JOHNSON, Nicole. 2019. “Strategic policing philosophy and the acquisition of technology: findings from a nationally representative survey of law enforcement” In: Policing & Society. Vol. 6, No. 29, pp. 727-743.

HOLLYWOOD, John; GOODISON, Sean; WOODS, Dulani; VERMEER, Michael; JACKSON, Brian. 2019. Fostering Innovation to Respond to Top Challenges in Law Enforcement. Available online. In: https://www. rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2930.html. Consultation date: 14/10/2021.

KOLODYAZHNY, Maxim. 2020. “Application of modern technologies in the field of crime prevention” In: Bulletin of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine. Vol. 1, No. 13, pp. 178-195.

LOSAVIO, Michael; CHOW, Kyre; KOLTAY, Andras; JAMES, Joshua. 2018. “The Internet of Things and the Smart City: Legal challenges with digital forensics, privacy, and security” In: Special Issue: Security and Privacy. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1-11.

LUM, Cynthia; KOPER, Christopher; WILLIS, James. 2017. “Understanding the Limits of Technology’s Impact on Police Effectiveness” In: Police Quarterly. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 135–163.

MASTROBUONI, Giovanni. 2020. “Crime is Terribly Revealing: Information Technology and Police Productivity” In: The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 2727–2753.

MATLALA, Ramolobi. 2019. “Defining e-policing and smart policing for law enforcement agencies in Gauteng Province” In: Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology. Vol. 31, No. 1.

MATUSIAK, Matthew; KING, William. 2020. “Advancing the Study of Police Innovation: Toward an Empirical Definition and Classification of Contemporary Police Innovations” In: Crime & Delinquency. Vol. 12, No. 67, pp. 1982-2010.

NEMITZ, Paul. 2018. “Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence” In: Philosophical Transactions of the royal society A. Vol. 376, No. 2133, pp. 1-14.

PAGALLO, Ugo. 2018. “Apples, oranges, robots: four misunderstandings in today’s debate on the legal status of AI systems” In: Philosophical Transactions of the royal society A. Vol. 376, No. 2133, pp. 1-16.

PRAMANIK, Mik; LAU, Rik; YUE, Wet; YE, Yaw; LI, Cim. 2017. “Big data analytics for security and criminal investigations” In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Vol. 54, No. 7.

ROSSER, Gabriel; DAVIES, Toby; BOWERS, Kate; JOHNSON, Shane; CHENG, Tao. 2017. “Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?” In: Journal оf Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 3, No. 33, pp. 569-594.

SHEVCHUK, Victor. 2020. “Innovative forensic products in law enforcement: concepts, features and problems of implementation in practice” In: Scientific works of the National University “Odessa Law Academy”. Vol. 26, pp. 139-155.

SHUBENKOVA, Katerina; EGOROV, Gregoriy. 2020. “Legal and Technical Forms of Developing Digital Law-Enforcement in Modern Russia: Problems and Prospects” In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 111, pp. 705-711.

SIMRAN, Baheti; NIKHIL, Tiwari; RUSHIL, Parikh; PARITOSH, Dandekar; RAJAT, Chandak; ABHIJEET, Raipurkar. 2020. “Challenges and Innovations in Cybersecurity” In: Bioscience biotechnology research communications. Vol. 14, pp. 227-230.

SOLDATOVA, Victoria. 2013. “Some measures to prevent and combat cybercrime” In: Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine. Vol. 3, pp. 145-155.

UNITED NATIONS. 2018. Discussion Guide for the Fourteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. Available online. In: https://www.unodc.org/documents/congress//Documentation_14th_Congress/DiscussionGuide/A_CONF234_PM1_r_V1806331.pdf. Consultation date: 13/10/2021.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. 2018. Innovation policy of foreign countries: concepts, strategies, priorities. Available online. In: http:// kno.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/36385.pdf. Consultation date: 17/10/2021.

WEIJUNG,Ciro.2020.“Cyberstalkingandlawenforcemen.ProcediaComputer Science” In: 24th KES International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Vol. 176, pp. 1188
– 1194.

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION. 2021. Global Innovation Index: 14th Edition. Available online. In: https://www.wipo. int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf. Consultation date: 17/10/2021.

Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies in the Context of the Introduction of Innovative Technologies (Comparative Legal Aspect)

Actividades de los organismos encargados de hacer cumplir la ley en el contexto de la introducción de tecnologías innovadoras (aspecto jurídico comparado)

Resumen

Descargas

Biografía del autor/a

Citas