Activities of the court to investigate the circumstances of criminal proceedings and their assessment under the laws of Ukraine

Hanna  Teteriatnyk; Oleksii  Ryzhyy; Anna  Fedorova; Yurii  Vykhodets; Vitalii  Marko

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3970.12

Hanna Teteriatnyk Odesa State University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-7912
Oleksii Ryzhyy Judge of the Sarny District Court of Rivne Region https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-3599
Anna Fedorova Territorial management of the State bureau of services https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-0799
Yurii Vykhodets Cyberpolice Department of the National Police of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-9224
Vitalii Marko Territorial Department of the State Bureau of Investigation in the city of Khmelnytsky https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-2106

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.12

Palabras clave: tribunal en Ucrania, proceso penal, prueba, circunstancias de un delito, evaluación de la prueba

Resumen

Se investigan las posibilidades procesales del tribunal para investigar las circunstancias del proceso penal en la etapa de juicio, mediante el análisis de la legislación procesal penal actual de Ucrania, la práctica judicial, las posiciones de los científicos, así como mediante el uso de métodos modernos de conocimiento científico (dialéctico, análisis sistemático de las normas legales, derecho comparado, estadístico, sinérgico, hermenéutico, sistema -estructural y formalmente dogmático). También, se aclara la esencia de categorías científicas y jurídicas como «circunstancias del proceso penal», «verificación de pruebas», «evaluación de pruebas», etc. En particular, se concluyó que durante el juicio la prueba se examina de acuerdo con un determinado procedimiento y con la participación de los participantes en el proceso penal, quienes tienen derecho a formular preguntas, llamar la atención del tribunal, presentar recursos, etc. Las acciones de investigación (búsqueda) han sido identificadas como el medio procesal más común para examinar pruebas en procesos penales. Se enfatiza que la valoración de la prueba por parte del tribunal, a diferencia de la inspección, no se combina con ninguna acción práctica y es una actividad puramente mental, lógica, que tiene como objetivo determinar la admisibilidad, relevancia, confiabilidad, valor (fuerza) de cada uno.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Hanna Teteriatnyk, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of legal science, аassistant рprofessor, Сhief of the Department of Criminal Process, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine.

Oleksii Ryzhyy, Judge of the Sarny District Court of Rivne Region

Judge of the Sarny District Court of Rivne Region. Ukraine

Anna Fedorova, Territorial management of the State bureau of services

Senior investigator, Territorial management of the State bureau of services, located in the city of Mykolaev, Mykolaev, Ukraine.

Yurii Vykhodets, Cyberpolice Department of the National Police of Ukraine

Chief of Оdesa regional unit of Cyberpolice Department of the National Police of Ukraine.

Vitalii Marko, Territorial Department of the State Bureau of Investigation in the city of Khmelnytsky

Candidate of Law, Senior Detective Officer of the Territorial Department of the State Bureau of Investigation in the city of Khmelnytsky. Ukraine.

Citas

ALL-UKRAINIAN SURVEY OF CITIZENS ON DEMOCRATIC CHANGE IN THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SPHERES, JUDICIAL REFORM AND THE PROCESS OF CLEANSING THE GOVERNMENT IN UKRAINE: SUMMARIZING THE RESULTS OF THE 2016 STUDY AND COMPARISON WITH DATA FOR 2015. 2016. Kyiv, Ukraine.

CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE: Law of Ukraine of June 28. 1996. № 254k/96- VR. Available online. In: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96- вр. Consultation date: 12/02/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE: Law of Ukraine of April 13. 2012. № 4651-VI. Available online. In: http://zakon3.radakors.gov. ua/laws/show/4651-17/print1458049476321499. Consultation date: 12/03/2021.

DEKHTYAR, Oksana. 2014. Principle of immediacy of research of indications, things and documents and its realization in criminal proceedings: the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Odessa State University of Internal Affairs. Odessa, Ukraine.

DYAKOV, Volodymyr. 2016. Epistemological and legal nature of the acquittal: the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.

GROMOV, Nikolay; ZAITSEVA, Svetlana. 2002. Assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings. PRIOR initiative. Moscow, Russia.

GROSHEVYI, Yuriy; STAKHIVSKYI, Sergiy. 2006. Evidence and proof in the criminal process: scientific practical manual. KNT. Kyiv, Ukraine.

GRYNIUK, Volodymyr. 2012. Independence of a judge in the criminal process of Ukraine. monograph. Our product. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KOROVAIKO, Oleksandr. 2010. Features of the actions aimed at collecting and verifying evidence during the trial: the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Odessa State University of Internal Affairs. Odessa, Ukraine.

KORSUN, Volodymyr. 2011. The court as a subject of criminal procedural evidence: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KUCHYNSKA, Oksana. 2011. “Is it possible to establish an objective truth in criminal proceedings” In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. No. 4. P. 4.

LUKASHKINA, Tetiana. 2013. Proof as a stage of law enforcement process. In: Actual problems of proof in criminal proceedings: materials of the All- Ukrainian scientific-practical Internet conference. November 27, 2013. Legal Literature. P. 31. Odessa, Ukraine.

LUPINSKAYA, Polina. 1997. Evaluation of evidence in the textbook. Criminal Procedure Law of the Russian Federation; ed. 2nd, rev. and add. Yurist Publishing House. Moscow, Russia.

LYTVYN, Oleksandr. 2012. “Research of evidence in court proceedings: some questions” In: Current issues of state and law. Vol. 67, p. 729.

LYTVYN, Oleksandr. 2016. Criminal procedural evidence at the stage of trial: Odessa State University of Internal Affairs. Odessa, Ukraine.

MAKSYMYSHYN, Natalia. 2016. Judicial interrogation: procedural and forensic research: the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. Lviv, Ukraine.

NOR, Vasyl. 2010. “Truth in criminal proceedings: idea, dogma of law, implementation” In: Journal of the National University: Ostroh Academy. Series: Right. No. 2, p.12.

NOR, Vasyl. 2013. Comprehensiveness, completeness, and impartiality of establishing the circumstances of a criminal offense: doctrinal approaches and regulations under the new CPC of Ukraine. In: Problems of state formation and protection of human rights in Ukraine: materials of the XIX reporting scientific-practical conference. February 7-8, 2013.
P. 359. Lviv, Ukraine.

RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE of January 21. 2016. Case № 5-249x16. Available online. In: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/.../ E84BAE31236A51A1C2257F7D004. Consultation date: 12/03/2021.

RYBALKA, Oleksandr. 2013. The court as a participant in the process of proving in the process of reforming criminal procedural law. In: Ways to improve criminal procedural law: materials of the regional round table. April 19, 2013. Legal literature. P. 135. Odessa, Ukraine.

SHEVCHUK, Marta. 2015. Initiatives to the court and from the legal situation of criminal provision before the hour of the ship’s review: the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. Lviv, Ukraine.

SHINKARUK, Volodymyr. 2002. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Abris. Kyiv, Ukraine.

SLIPCHENKO, Volodymyr. 2009. Evaluation of evidence by the court of second instance. In: Problems of Criminal Procedure and Civil Procedure Law: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Professors of the Department of Justice M. Mykheenko and M. Stefan. Obriy, pp. 231–233. Kyiv, Ukraine.

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE JUDICIARY OF UKRAINE FOR 2015-2020. 2012. Approved by the Council of Judges of Ukraine on December 21, 2012. Available online. In: http://court.gov. ua/969076/rsusp. Consultation date: 12/02/2021.

STROGOVICH, Mikhail. 1968. The course of the Soviet criminal process: in 2 volumes. Nauka. Vol. 1. Moscow, Russia.

VAPNYARCHUK, Vyacheslav. 2014. “The essence of active and proactive activity of the court in criminal proceedings” In: Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series right. Vol. 25. P. 237.