Judicial Protection of a Human Dignity Right

Palabras clave: estado de derecho, acceso a la justicia, abuso de los derechos procesales, dignidad humana, derechos humanos

Resumen

La dignidad humana se ha convertido en un concepto jurídico central en todo el mundo y se utiliza cada vez más en decisiones judiciales en muchos países que no la incluyen en su legislación nacional. Sin embargo, debido a la reconocida vaguedad del concepto, académicos y jueces han identificado muchas dificultades en su aplicación y los desafíos específicos que plantea al estado de derecho. En consecuencia, desde una metodología documental este artículo intenta desarrollar y proponer, a partir del análisis de diferentes enfoques filosóficos de la definición de la dignidad humana, una serie de principios que pueden ser aplicados en las decisiones judiciales para lograr un profundo entendimiento común de la utilidad de la dignidad humana y, al mismo tiempo, trata de resolver problemas que ahora son ampliamente reconocidos, tanto por los partidarios como por los críticos del uso judicial de este concepto. Se concluye que el concepto de dignidad humana debe tener una influencia decisiva en la formación, no sólo del derecho sustantivo sino también procesal. Debe convertirse en un criterio para la necesidad de medidas para prevenir el abuso de los derechos procesales, la distorsión de la justicia y la evasión deliberada de su tarea principal.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Valeriy Mamnitskyi, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD in Law, Associate Professor at the Civil Process Department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Iryna Cherevatenko, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD (Law), Associate Professor of Civil Procedure Department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Natalia Horban, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

Citas

BARASH, Yevhen Yukhimovich. 2016. “Foreign experience of social work with convicts” In: Scientific Bulletin of the Institute of Criminal-Executive Service. Vol. 1, pp. 10–17.

BEKHRUZ, Hashmatullah. 2013. “Comparative jurisprudence: modern aspects of research” Comparative jurisprudence. Vol. 1-2, pp. 278–285.

BILETSKYI, Andrey Vladimirovich. 2018. Public participation in the prevention of corruption in Ukraine: Thesis for the PhD in Law. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

CONNOR, Neil. 2018. China deploys of elderly volunteers to keep the peace after Beijing knife rampage. The telegraph. Available online. In: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/02/12/china-deploys-army- elderly-volunteers-keep-peace-beijing-knife/. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

DROMIN, Victor Nikolaevich. 2007. “The evolution of punishment in the context of preventive opportunities: from imprisonment to probation” In: Current issues of state and law: collection of research papers. Legal lit. Vol. 32, pp. 265–271.

HOLINA, Vladimir Vasilyevich. 2011. Crime prevention (theory and practice). Study guide. National Law Academy of Ukraine. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

HOLINA, Vladimir Vasilyevich; KOLODIAZHNYI, Maxim Gennadyevich. 2015. “World crime: current trends and countermeasures” In: Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences. Vol.2, pp. 92–100.

KOLODIAZHNYI, Maxim Gennadyevich. 2017. Modern foreign experience of public influence on crime. Monograph. Law. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

KOLODIAZHNYI, Maxim Gennadyevich. 2018. “Patrolling as a component of a strategy to reduce the possibility of committing crimes” In: Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine: collection of research papers. KhNUVS. Vol. 1, pp. 37–46.

LAW OF UKRAINE. 2017. Development Strategy of the System of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine for the period up to 2020, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. № 1023-r. Available online. In: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1023-2017-%D1%80#Text. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

LEHEZA, Yevhen; SAVIELIEVA, Maryna; DZHAFAROVA, Olena. 2018. “Structural and legal analysis of scientific activity regulation in developed countries”. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 4 (3), pp. 147-157. Available online In: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3- 147-157. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

OFFICIAL WEB-SITE OF THE GOV.UK. 2020. Police community support officers (pcsos) and special constables. Available online In://www.gov. uk/police-community-support-officers-what-they-are. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

SHOSTKO, Elena Yuriyivna. 2012. Theories of the causes of juvenile delinquency in modern American criminology: scientific-practical manual. Ed. magazine. Law of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine.

THIRTEENTH UNITED NATIONS CONGRESS ON CRIME PREVENTION AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE. 2015. National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention and criminal justice. Working paper. Available online. In: https://www.unodc.org/ documents/congress/Documentation/Report/ACONF222_17e_ V1502929.pdf. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

VEDERNYKOVA, Olga Nikolaevna. 2001. Theory and practice of combating crime in Britain. Moscow, Russia. VICTIMS SUPPORT PROGRAM. 2013. Available online In: https://www. legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2013-037. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

WILLIAMS, Naomi. 2014. “100 Promising Practices on Safer Cities: Collation of Urban Safety Practices. The International Centre for the Prevention of Crime; The European Forum for Urban Security”. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Available online. https://slidelegend. com/100-promising-practices-on-safer-cities_59b49e191723dd6c734 1f362.html. Consultation date: 11/11/2020.

ZADOROZHNYI, Sergey Anatolyevich. 2017. Mechanisms for preventing and combating corruption in local authorities. Thesis for the PhD in Law. Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Publicado
2021-07-09
Cómo citar
Mamnitskyi, V., Cherevatenko, I., & Horban, N. (2021). Judicial Protection of a Human Dignity Right. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(69), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.13
Sección
Derecho Público