Legal Impact Theory in the Context of an Integrative Approach to Understanding Law

• Roman R. Palekha The Russian State University of Justice
• Valery P. Belyaev Southwest State University
• Valery P. Kanishchev The Russian State University of Justice
• Larisa L. Solovyova The Russian State University of Justice
• Neonila A. Turanina Belgorod State Institute of Arts and Culture

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.08

Palabras clave: legal impact, legal impact theory, integrative approach, progressive type of legal thinking, understanding of law

Resumen

The theory of legal impact from the perspective of an integrative approach to understanding law, is a progressive theoretical and methodological toolkit with a high potential of heuristically mastering of various legal phenomena. This theory understood within the framework of an integrative approach, allows us to consider its legal nature, content and essence as fully and thoroughly as possible, which creates favorable conditions for achieving the criteria of scientific research, such as: comprehensiveness, objectivity, and historicism. It is the integrative approach that makes it possible to fully realize such a fundamental principle of scientific research as unity in diversity, to study the nature of the legal impact comprehensively and deeply, as a complex socio-legal phenomenon, determined by various factors of public life. The methodological ground of the examination depends on the utilization of different general logical procedures and techniques for logical information, just as specific logical strategies – recorded legitimate, formal-lawful, relative lawful and interpretative. Results showed that law isn't reducible to the arrangement of lawful standards, it is a lot more extensive and progressively various, which is related with its source, bearer and vehicle - a man, with his intentionally solid willed nature and passionate mental motivations.

Citas

AUSTIN, Joe. 1873. Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of the positive Law. 1. London, England.

BELYAEVA, George; BELYAEV, V; BIDOVA, B; DYUMINA, A; KUKSIN, I. 2019. “Peculiarities of national interests’ institutionalization in the North American tradition: history and modernity” In: Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews. No. 7, Vol. 4, pp. 122-140.

BERG, Lyudmila Nikolay. 2018. “On the main epistemological problems of the formation of a model of legal impact” In: State and Law. No. 3, pp. 33-48 [in Russian].

BERG, Lyudmila Nikolay. 2018a. Theoretical and Legal Science of Legal Impact. Legal Issues. Collective monograph based on the results of the III Alekseevsky readings / rev. ed. V.D. Passes. - Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural State University [in Russian].

BERMAN, Jordan. 1988. “Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History” In: California Law Review. No. 76, Vol. 4, pp. 779-801.

BILL OF RIGHTS “An Act declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown". Available online. In: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/contents. Date of consultation: 27/01/2020.

CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES. 1787. Available online. In: https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/the-constitution/. Date of consultation: 27/01/2020.

DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 No. 683 “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation” (January 4, 2016) // Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation. No. 1 (part II), Art. 212 [in Russian].

EHRLICH, Evgenevna. 1929. Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. Miinchen und Leipzig.

ERSHOV, Valery Valerievna. 2018. Legal and Individual Regulation of Public Relations: Monograph. M.: RPMU Moscow. [in Russian].

FLORES, Borisovna Ivanovna. 2012. “The Problem about the Nature of Law vis-à-vis Legal Rationality Revisited: Towards an Integrative Jurisprudence” In: Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper. No.12-160, pp.1-37.

HALL, Jerome. 1964. “From Legal Theory to Integrative Jurisprudence” In: University of Cincinnati Law Review. No. 33, Vol. 2, pp. 153-205.

KANISHCHEV Valery Pavel; PALEKHA, R.R. 2018. “An Integrative Approach to Understanding Law as a Progressive Type of Legal Thinking” In: Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. – Voronezh, 2, pp. 88-112. [in Russian].

KANT, Immanuel. 1988. Rechtslehre: Schriften zur Rechtsphilosophie. Berlin, Germany. 34 p.

KELSEN, Hans. 2007. General Theory of Law and State. The lawbook Exchange, Ltd, Moscow, Russia.

KORNEV, Vladimir Nikolay 2018. “Dialectics of Uncertainty and Certainty of Law” In: State and Law. No. 11, pp. 66-81 [in Russian].

NEMYTINA, Marina Valery. 2007. Problems of Improving Legal Understanding. Modern Research Methods in Jurisprudence, Ed. N.I. Matuzova and A.V. Malko. Saratov. Moscow. [in Russian].

ORZIKH, Mikaeil. 1978. Law and Personality. Kiev – Odessa [in Russian].

PEROV, Olga Yagfarovna. 2008. Dialectics of the Correlation of Legal Understanding and Legal Impact: Author. Dis Cand. Legal Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod [in Russian].

PIAGE, Joe. 1971. “Methodologie des Relation Interdisciplinaires” In: Archives de Philosophie. Recherches et documentation. No. 34, Vol. 4, pp. 540-561.

SINENKO, Valery Sergei; TURANIN, V.Y; LILIKOVA, O.S; MITYAKINA, N.M; RUBANOV, S.A. 2019. “Legal regulation of public companies in the countries of the anglo-saxon legal system” In: Amazonia Investiga. No. 8. Vol. 19, pp. 679-683.

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. S.d. Available online. In: http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION/document/. Date of consultation: 12/03/2019.