Public perception of digital governance in Huancayo

Keywords: local public administration in Huancayo, digital governance, digital participation, citizen perception, public value

Abstract

The study analyzed citizens' perceptions of  digital  governance  in the Provincial Municipality of Huancayo in 2025, in a scenario where digital transformation defines the relationship between the state and citizens in a different way. The objective was to identify the technological, organizational, and social factors that influence citizens, valuing digital public management. In methodological terms, a quantitative, correlational, non-experimental design approach was used. The sample consisted of 384 citizens, who were given a structured survey with a reliability of α = 0.88, which consisted of five dimensions: Public Value, Digital Government, Consistent Use of Technologies, Participation with Digital Devices, and In- Person Participation. The data collected were analyzed using the PLS-SEM model in SmartPLS software. The results revealed that the relationships between all variables are positive and significant (p < 0.001), while Digital Participation showed  a  partial  mediating  effect.  In  conclusion, it was determined that digital governance in Huancayo is dependent on technological consistency, participation, and citizen trust, adding in-person and digital channels to strengthen more inclusive and transparent public management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albornoz, N., Appaya, S., Martinez-Garza, R., Porteous, D. J., Rifon Perez, A., & Zaballos,A.(2024). Unlockingthepotentialofdigitalpublicinfrastructure (DPI) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): A region-specific perspective – A World Bank–IADB technical note. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099072524161522274

Alcaide-Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & Villamayor Arellano, C. (2022). Factors in the adoption of open government initiatives in Spanish local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), Article 101743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101743

DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Peru. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-peru

Defensoría del Pueblo. (2023). Informe defensorial N. º 001-2023-DP/AAE- PDBG: Transparencia activa en los gobiernos locales y regionales. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Informe-Transparencia-Activa-de-los-GL-y-GR.pdf

Egoavil Rosales, L. S., & Suárez Estrella, M. A. (2022). Gobierno electrónico y satisfacción del ciudadano en la región Junín [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú]. Repositorio Institucional UNCP. https://repositorio.uncp.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12894/10382

Espinoza Orozco, J. B., Ramos Gamarra, E. E., & Orosco-Fabian, J. R. (2023). Gobierno digital municipal desde la percepción de los ciudadanos. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales, 19(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.18004/riics.2023.junio.131

George,D.,&Mallery,P.(2020).IBMSPSSStatistics26stepbystep:Asimpleguide and reference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765

Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C., Fabian, N., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, Article 113777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw- Hill. https://bellasartes.upn.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/METODOLOGIA-DE-LA-INVESTIGACION-Sampieri-Mendoza-2018.pdf

Herrera Ruesta, K. V., Gallardo Zapata, J. E., Carreño Calderón, R. F., Gómez Romero, C., & De la A Perero, G. M. (2024). Modelo de gobernanza digital para la participación ciudadana en una municipalidad de Piura. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14484269

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2025, 26 de marzo). El 58.4% de los hogares del país tiene acceso a internet [Nota de prensa]. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/inei/noticias/1133448-el-58-4-de-los-hogares-del-pais-tiene-acceso-a-internet

Landeo Mallascca, M. A., & Vila Cristobal, Y. E. (2020). Modelo de Gobierno Abierto e-Government para mejorar la participación ciudadana en la Municipalidad distrital de Huayucachi [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú]. Repositorio Institucional UNCP. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12894/7838

Lin, Z., & Yaakop, M. R. (2024). Research on digital governance based on Web of Science—A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, Article 1403404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1403404

Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001

Morales Rocha, J. L., Coyla Zela, M. A., Morillos Valderrama, S. O., & Quispe Mamani, D. (2024). Gobierno abierto en municipalidades del Perú como alternativa para generar condiciones en los ciudadanos. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 28(102-2). https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.102.2

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press. https://www.google.com.pe/books/edition/Creating_Public_Value/Hm9uKVj0qDYC

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Digital government review of Latin America and the Caribbean. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/digital-government-review-of-latin-america-and-the-caribbean_29f32e64-en.html

Ramirez-Madrid, J. P., Escobar-Sierra, M., Lans-Vargas, I., & Montes Hincapie, J. M. (2022). Government influence on e-government adoption by citizens in Colombia. PLOS ONE, 17(2), Article e0264495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264495

Salazar, J. R. (2024). ICT competencies and citizen participation in students of a public university in Peru - 2024. In E-Government digital frontiers (pp. 267–283). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386271440

Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Baeck, P., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954

Sun, C., Jiang, G., & Zhang, J. (2024). An analysis of hotspots, subject structure, and emerging trends in digital governance research. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268756

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). E-Government Survey 2024: Governing in a digital world for the SDGs. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/E-Government-Survey-2024.pdf

Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2024). The digital governance puzzle: Towards integrative theory of humans, machines, and organizations in public management. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102530

World Bank. (2023, 4 de octubre). Digital solutions can fuel growth, inclusion and better governance in Latin America and the Caribbean [Comunicado de prensa]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/10/04/conectividad-digital-impulsa-crecimiento-inclusion-perspectivas-america-latina-caribe
Published
2026-01-29
How to Cite
Huamanchaqui Hinostroza, S. A., Canchanya Paucar , S. L., Reymundo Soto , M. C., Ortiz Colca , G. C., & Larico Durand , K. J. (2026). Public perception of digital governance in Huancayo. Political Questions, 44(84), 37-58. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/45136