Interpretation of tax law in cases involving commercial entities: Opportunities to exchange best practices in the area of corporate social responsibility regulation
Interpretación de la legislación fiscal en casos que involucran entidades comerciales: Oportunidades para intercambiar mejores prácticas en el aspecto de la regulación de la responsabilidad social de las empresas
Abstract
The article aims to develop a correct understanding of the essence and implications of the basic principles and legal provisions governing tax matters, as well as to form an insight into their evolutionary transformations on the basis of the exchange of relevant best practices between Ukraine and other countries. Relying on methods of comparative review, as well as methods of systematic review and standard techniques of text analysis, the author covers theoretical and practical issues related to the balanced combination of literal and intentional interpretation of tax legislation provisions, in dubio pro tributario in the interpretation of tax laws and question of reasonable cause and good faith of taxpayers. It is noted, in particular, that common law countries and continental legal systems are united by a tendency towards a balanced combination of literal and purposive interpretation. It is emphasized in the conclusions that, along with the literal wording of tax law provisions, the purpose of their introduction and the general principles of tax law are taken into account. Moreover, in some countries, reference to the intention of the legislators is even allowed.
Downloads
References
DEMIN, Alexander. 2020. “Certainty and Uncertainty in Tax Law: Do Opposites Attract?” In: Laws. Vol. 09, No. 04-30. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9040030. Consultation date: 01/03/23.
Andrii Zakharchenko, Yaroslav Sydorov, Valeriia Novoshytska y Vasyl Manzyuk Interpretation of tax law in cases involving commercial entities: Opportunities to exchange best practices in the area of corporate social responsibility regulation
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2011. OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. russia. No. 14902/04. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106308. Consultation date: 22/02/23.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2015. Matić and Polonia d.o.o. v. Serbia (dec.). No. 23001/08. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156133. Consultation date: 06/01/23.
GARBARINO, Carlo. 2014. “Legal Interpretation of Tax Law: Chapter 8. Legal Interpretation of Tax Law” In: Krever, Richard (Ed). Legal Interpretation of Tax Law. Richard Krever – Robert van Berderode editors. Bocconi, Italy. pp. 213-249.
IRISH REVENUE COMMISSIONERS. 2021. Guide to interpreting legislation. Part 01-00-06. Dublin, Republic of Ireland. Available online. In: https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-01/01-00-06.pdf. Consultation date: 12/03/23.
JUCHNIEWICZ, Edward; STWOŁ, Małgorzata. 2017. The Principle of Resolving Doubts in Favour of Taxpayers in the Light of Polish Tax Law. In: M. Radvan (Ed.), The Financial Law towards Challenges of the XXI Century. Editorial Masaryk University. Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 305-313.
PRESTON, Nicola. 1990. “The Interpretation of Taxing Statutes: The English Perspective” In: Akron Tax Journal. Vol. 07, No. 02, pp. 43-59.
REPORTS FROM THE VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE (VVR). 2011. Tax Code of Ukraine of 2011. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 06/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. 1957. A. V. Fernandez vs. State of Kerala. AIR 1957 SC 657. Available online. In: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1350547/. Consultation date: 12/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF IRELAND. 2011. Dunnes Stores v. Revenue Commissioners. IESC 50. Available online. In: https://www.taxfind.ie/document/tax_cases_1269-top_doc-4017412704. Consultation date: 12/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 1923. United States v. Merriam. 263 U.S. 179, 188. Available online. In: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/263/179/. Consultation date: 01/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE. 2020. Anonymous v. Zhilkomservice Municipal enterprise. Case no. 640/9124/19. Available online. In: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88460805 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 06/04/23.
SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE. 2021. Regna Italy UA LLC v. Transcarpathian Customs of the State Customs Service. Case no. 380/671/20. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94904871 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 01/02/23.
SUPREMECOURTOFUKRAINE.2022a.Anonymousv.MainDirectorateofthe State Tax Service of Ukraine in Luhansk region. Case no. 826/15940/18. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104952027. Consultation date: 10/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE. 2022b. Poltava Gas and Oil Company JV v. Main Directorate of the State Tax Service of Ukraine in Poltava region. Case no. 816/687/16. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104044775 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 12/04/23.
SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE. 2022c. Anonymous v. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine and others. Case no. 910/15737/20. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102736044 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 01/03/23.
SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE. 2022d. Electrostal-Kurakhove LLC v. Tran Main Directorate of the State Tax Service of Ukraine in Donetsk region. Case no. 200/5932/19-а. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104094827 [In Ukrainian]. Consultation date: 12/12/22.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)