Interpretation of legal norms in modern jurisprudence

Interpretación de las normas jurídicas en la jurisprudencia moderna

• Olha Merdova Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs. Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-2364
• Galina Striiashko State Tax University, Irpin, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-025X
• Karyna Marshalek Dnipro University of Technology, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-4361
• Serhii Terepa State Tax University, Irpin, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-712X
• Serhii Karpenko University of Customs and Finance, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7736-2525

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.20

Keywords: modes of interpretation of legal norms, hermeneutic purpose, legal understanding, criminal liability, types of legal understanding

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to consider appropriate forms of interpretation of legal norms in modern jurisprudence. In the main content it has been established that the interpretation results in a general conclusion or a sum of conclusions reached by the subject of interpretation in the process of clarification of the rule of law (legal norms), using the whole set of methods of interpretation, which is appropriate to the legal reality. The methodological basis of the research was presented as comparative-legal and systematic analysis, formal-legal method, as well as hermeneutic method, method of analysis and synthesis. It has been concluded that the procedure for achieving the purpose of interpretation should be as follows: grammatical interpretation - teleological interpretation - clarification of the conformity of the essence of the content of the legal norm with the principles of law - systematic interpretation - special legal interpretation - logical interpretation -  functional interpretation - historical interpretation - repeated application of the interpretation procedure upon receipt of new data. If this procedure is properly followed, it is possible to achieve the conditions for the achievement of an adequate legal hermeneutics, which places the texts in their context of meaning.

References

ANTOSHKINA, Valeriia Kostiantynivna. 2011. Reasons for the interpretation of civil law norms: Actual problems of civil law: the materials of the «round table» are dedicated. in memory of Prof. Genghis Khan by Nufatovych Asimov. National Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise. Right. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

BEZPALOVA, Olha; YUNINA, Maryna; KOROHOD, Svitlana; REZVOROVICH, Kristina; OHANISIAN, Tsahik. 2021. “Legal regulation of entrepreneurial activity in the national security system” In: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 340-355. `

BUHA, Volodymyr; IAKUBIN, Oleksii; MAZUR, Tamara; REZVOROVICH, Kristina; DARAGANOVA. Nina. 2022. “Legal regulation of the institute of control in the field of housing construction in the conditions of armed aggression of the Russian Federation” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 73, pp. 151-171.

HALABURDA, Nadiia; LEHEZA, Yevhen; CHALAVAN, Viktor; YEFIMOV, Volodymyr; YEFIMOVA, Inna. 2021. “Compliance with the principle of the rule of law in guarantees of ensuring the legality of providing public services in Ukraine” In: Journal of law and political sciences. Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 100-121.

KOBRUSIEVA, Yevheniiа; LEHEZA, Yevhen; RUDOI, Kateryna; SHAMARA, Oleksandr; CHALAVAN, Viktor. 2021. “International standards of social protection of internally displaced persons: administrative and criminal aspects” In: Jurnal cita hukum indonesian law journal. Vol 9, No 3, pp. 461-484.

KOLINKO, Tsahik; REZVOROVYCH, Krystyna; YUNINA, Maryna. 2019. “Legal characteristic of the franchise agreement in Germany” In: Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 96-100.

KOTIUK, Volodymyr Oleksandrovych. 1996. Theory of law: educational. Ventur. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KUDLAI, Tamara Pavlivna. 2009. Theory of the state and law: study guide. T.P. Kudlai NADU, Kyiv, Ukraine.

LEHEZA, Yevhen; PISOTSKA, Karina; DUBENKO, Oleksandr; DAKHNO, Oleksandr; SOTSKYI, Artur. 2022. “The Essence of the Principles of Ukrainian Law in Modern Jurisprudence” In: Revista Jurídica Portucalense. Available online: In: https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183- 2705(32)2022.ic-15. Consultation date: 13/01/2023.

MATVIICHUK, Anatolii; SHCHERBAK, Viktor; SIRKO, Viktoria; MALIEIEVA, Hanna; LEHEZA, Yevhen. 2022. “Human principles of law as a universal normative framework” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 75, pp. 221- 231.

MYKHAILOVYCH, Dmytro Marianovych. 2003. Official interpretation of the law: abstract of the dissertation for obtaining the scientific degree of candidate of legal sciences. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

NALYVAIKO, Larysa; LEHEZA, Yevhen; SACHKO, Oleksandr; SHCHERBYNA, Victor; CHEPIK-TREHUBENKO. Olha. 2022. “Principles of law: Methodological approaches to understanding in the context of modern globalization transformations” In: Ius Humani. Law Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 55-79.

PATEI-BRATASIUK, Mariia Hryhorivna. 2010. Anthropocentric theory of law: a study guide. Kyiv, Ukraine.

SKAKUN, Olha Fedorivna. 2012. Theory of law and the state: a textbook. Alert. Kyiv, Ukraine.

TYLCHYK, Vyacheslav; MATSELYK, Tetiana; HRYSHCHUK, Viktor; LOMAKINA, Olena; SYDOR, Markiian; LEHEZA, Yevhen. 2022. “Administrative and legal regulation of public financial activity: Regulación administrativa y legal de la actividad financiera pública” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 72, pp. 573-581.

VILLASMIL ESPINOZA, Jorge; LEHEZA, Yevhen; HOLOVII, Liudmyla. 2022. “Reflections for the interdisciplinary study of the Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 73, pp. 16-24.

VOLYNKA, Kateryna Hryhorivna. 2003. Theory of the state and law: a study guide. MAUP. Kyiv, Ukraine.