Parliamentary opposition and democratic transformation issues: Central and Eastern Europe in focus

Oposición parlamentaria y cuestiones de transformación democrática: Europa Central y oriental en el punto de mira

Keywords: parliamentary opposition, government-opposition relations, parliament in Europe, public policy making; democratic transformation

Abstract

The article presents a framework for comparing the policy-making rights of the parliamentary opposition in the parliamentary democracies of Central and Eastern Europe (Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine). The right of the parliamentary opposition to oppose the government formed by the ruling majority is a fundamental feature of liberal democracy. The application of constitutional values (democracy and rule of law) in Central and Eastern European states demonstrates the actual level of fragmentation, polarization and cartelization of the opposition. The Rule of Law Index 2021 explicitly shows that, among the Central and Eastern European countries surveyed, Lithuania ranks 18th, the Czech Republic 22nd, Poland 36th, Hungary 69th and Ukraine 74th. The Rule of Law Index refers to limitations of government powers, absence of corruption, open government and other issues related to the mission of the parliamentary opposition. It is concluded that, the distance (not only ideological) between the ruling majority and the parliamentary opposition is based on the ability to form government, participation in policy making, scrutiny of strategy and (populist) government policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vitaliy Kovalchuk, National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine.

Dr.hab., professor Department of Theory of Law and Constitutionalism Department National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic Kn. Romana 1/3, 79005, Ukraine.

Iryna Sofinska, National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine.

Dr.hab., professor Theory of Law and Constitutionalism Department National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic Kn. Romana 1/3, 79005, Ukraine.

Taras Harasymiv, National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine.

Dr.hab., professor Theory of Law and Constitutionalism Department National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic Kn. Romana 1/3, 79005. Ukraine.

Ivan Terlyuk, National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine.

Dr.hab., associate professor Theory of Law and Constitutionalism Department National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Kn. Romana 1/3, 79005, Ukraine.

Maiia Pyvovar, National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine. 

Dr. PhD, Theory of Law and Constitutionalism Department National Univesity Lviv Polytechnic Kn. Romana 1/3, 79005, Ukraine. 

References

COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS. 2020. “Parameters on the Relationship between the Parliamentary Majority and the Opposition in a Democracy: a checklist, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 119th Plenary Session” (Venice, 21-22 June 2019). Available online. In: https:// www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)015-e. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

CONSTITUTION OF LITHUANIA. 1992. Available online. In: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Lithuania_2019?lang=en. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

CONSTITUTION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. 1993. Available online. In: https://www.psp.cz/en/docs/laws/1993/1.html. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND. 1997. Available online. In: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE. 1996. Available online. In: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/44a280124.pdf. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE. 2022. Democracy Index 2021: less than half the world lives in a democracy. Available online. In: https://www.eiu.com/n/democracy-index-2021-less-than-half-the-world-lives-in-a-democracy/. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

KERSELL, John; DAHL, Robert. 1966. “Political Oppositions in Western Democracies” In: International Journal. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 535-593.

LOUWERSE, Tom; OTJES, Simon. 2018. “How Populists Wage Opposition: Parliamentary Opposition Behaviour and Populism in Netherlands” In: Political Studies. Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 479-495.

MAEDA, Ko. 2013. “Determinants of opposition fragmentation” In: Party Politics. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 763-774,

MICHEL, Rosenfeld; ANDRÁS, Sajó (ed.). 2012. “The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law”. [S. l.]: Oxford University Press, E-book. ISBN 9780199578610. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1093/ law/9780199578610.001.0001. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

OPINION OF VENICE COMMISSION. 2007. On Draft law on the parliamentary opposition in Ukraine. Available online. In: https://www.venice.coe. int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL(2007)006-e). Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

PARAMETERS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEENT HE PARLIAMENTARY MAJORITY AND THE OPPOSITION IN A DEMOCRACY: A CHECKLIST, ADOPTED BY THE VENICE COMMISSION AT ITS 119TH PLENARY
SESSION. 2019. 2019. And endorsed by the Committee of Ministers on 5 February 2020. Available online. In: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)015-e. Consultation date: 10/08/2022.

VENICE COMMISSION. 2010. “On the Role of the Opposition in a Democratic Parliament” In: Available online. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2010)025-e Consultation date: 10/06/2022.

WALDRON-MOORE, Pamela. 1999. “Eastern Europe at the Crossroads of Democratic Transition” In: Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 32-62.

WHITAKER, Richard; MARTIN, Shane. 2021 “Divide to conquer? Strategic parliamentary opposition and coalition government” In: Party Politics. p. 135406882110428. Available online. In: https://doi. org/10.1177/13540688211042859. Consultation date: 10/06/2022.
Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Kovalchuk, V., Sofinska, I., Harasymiv, T., Terlyuk, I., & Pyvovar, M. (2022). Parliamentary opposition and democratic transformation issues: Central and Eastern Europe in focus: Oposición parlamentaria y cuestiones de transformación democrática: Europa Central y oriental en el punto de mira. Political Questions, 40(75), 855-867. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.51
Section
Derecho Público