Analysis of court decisions in cases on provision of in vitro fertilization services in Ukraine and Europe

Análisis de las decisiones judiciales en casos sobre la prestación de servicios de fertilización in vitro en Ucrania y Europa

Abstract

The main reason for the rapid development and promotion of reproductive technologies is the desire to have children of people who, for certain reasons, create such an opportunity. When writing the article, such methods were used as: historical, analysis, synthesis, systemic, functional, special-legal. It is argued that two types of reproductive technologies are of particular importance for medical law: in vitro fertilization and surrogacy. It is argued that such reproductive technologies as in vitro fertilization are an auxiliary introduction of donor material (sperm or egg) into all forms of a woman. It is also noted that not all researchers today support and consider optimal the formulations established in the main legislative acts of Ukraine on health care, regarding the right of every woman capable of fertilizing and implanting an embryo. The conclusions emphasize the importance of providing legislative guarantees for the possibility of introducing certain reproductive technologies for people who need such interventions for medical reasons. It is proposed to classify the principles of donation of reproductive cells such as sperm, oocytes and embryos. For this purpose, court rulings in cases involving the provision of in vitro fertilization services were also analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Kossak, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.

Doctor in Law, Full Professor, Head of Civil Law and Legal Proceedings Departament Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.

Alla Herts, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine. 

Doctor in Law, Full Professor, Professor of Civil Law and Legal Proceedings Department Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine. 

Mykola Stefanchuk, National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.

Doctor in Law, Full Professor, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine, Leading researcher of Department of Private Law Problems, Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.

Svitlana Senyk, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.

Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor of Civil Law and Legal Proceedings Department Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.

Inna Zaitseva-Kalaur, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine.

Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor of Civil Law and Legal Proceedings Department West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine.

References

BBC. 2016. Britain Has Approved the Birth of Children by Three Parents. News: Website. Available online. In: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news- 38329950. Consultation date: 24/05/2022.

CASE NO 760/12830/13. 2013. Information server of the Unified State Register of Judgments of Ukraine. Available online. In: http://www.reyestr.court. gov.ua. Consultation date: 21/05/2022.

CASE NO. 2-2567/11. 2011. Information server of the Unified State Register of Judgments of Ukraine. Available online. In: http://www.reyestr.court. gov.ua. Consultation date: 23/05/2022.

CASE NO. 2610/22368/2012. 2012. Information server of the Unified State Register of Judgments of Ukraine. Available online. In: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Consultation date: 21/05/2022.

CASE NO. 520/12514/18. 2018. Information server of the Unified State Register of Judgments of Ukraine. Available online. In: http://www.reyestr.court. gov.ua. Consultation date: 21/05/2022.

CIVIL CODE OF UKRAINE. 2003. No 435-IV. Available online. In: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text. Consultation date: 19/05/2022.

DZHOCHKA, Olena. 2007. “General theoretical aspect of legal regulation of reproductive function” In: Medical Law of Ukraine: Problems of Formation and Development. Conference Proceedings of the First All- Ukrainian Research and Training Conference. Lviv, Medytsyna i pravo, pp. 127–133. Lviv, Ukraine.

FAMILY CODE OF UKRAINE. 2002. No 2947-iii. Available online. In: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14?lang=en#Text. Consultation date: 23/05/2022.

FUNDAMENTALS OF THE LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE ON HEALTH CARE. 1992. Law No 2801-xii of Ukraine. Available online. In: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2801-12?lang=uk#Text. Consultation date: 27/05/2022.

HOLOVASHCHUK, Anna. 2012. “Assisted reproductive technologies as a way of realizing the right to motherhood” In: Rule of law, legalness, and human rights. International Research and Training Conference. Tsentr pravovykh naukovykh doslidzhen. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KOSTIN, Ilya; BONDAR, Oleksandr. 2009. Some issues of legal regulation of reproductive fertilization. Ukrainian Medical Journal. Available online. In: https://www.umj.com.ua/en/archive. Consultation date: 24/05/2022.

KUSHNIRENKO, Dmytro. 2018. It is necessary to fight for the opportunity to become parents. Available online. In: https://ye.ua/zdorovya/36213_ Borotis_za_mozhlivist_stati_batkami_potribno____likar_ Kushnirenko.html. Consultation date: 21/05/2022.

MAIDANYK, Roman. 2013. Reproductive rights. Surrogate motherhood. Seriia “Kurs medychnoho prava” Alerta. Kyiv, Ukraine.

MEDICAL TOURISM: HOW TO CHOOSE A CLINIC ABROAD. 2013. Available online. In: https://tripmydream.ua/media/podborki/meditsinskij- tyrizm-eko-za-granitsej. Consultation date: 22/05/2022.

ORDER NO. 787 OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE ON APPROVAL OF THE PROCEDURE FOR THE USE OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE. 2013. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1697-13#Text. Consultation date: 24/05/2022.

STETSENKO, Semen. 2008. Medical Law of Ukraine: textbook, Stetsenko, S. H., Stetsenko, V. Yu., Seniuta, I. Ya., endorsed by Stetsenko, S. H., K.: Vseukrainska asotsiatsiia vydavtsiv “Pravova yednist”. Available online. In: http://pidruchniki.ws/12281128/pravo/zakonodavstvo_ukrayini_ pro_ohoronu_zdorovya_suchasniy_stan_perspektivi_rozvitku. Consultation date: 21/05/2022.

TARASEVYCH, Tetiana; MELNYK, Yaroslav; MELNYK, Mariіa; KRUSHELNYTSKA, Hanna; HRYTSENKO, Halyna. 2022. “Problems of Concluding Surrogacy Agreements: Practice of Ukraine and the EU. Problemas de la celebración de acuerdos de subrogación: práctica de Ucrania y la Unión europea” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 73, pp. 71-89.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; MATVIICHUK, Andriy; MUZYCHUK, Oleksandr; SHCHERBAKOVSKYI, Mykhailo; ODERII, Oleksiy. 2019. “Features of legal protection of medical inventions: present and future” In: Pathology. Vol. 16, No. 3(47), pp. 417-423.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; MULIAR, Galina. 2020. “Harmonization of National Courts’ Activities with the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in the Context of Protecting the Rights to Health Care” In: Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: Law. Vol. 20, pp. 101-112.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; PODZIROV, Andrii. 2021. “Registration and Authorization Proceduresin the Field of Medical Tourism” In: Administrative law and proceeding. Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 54-69.
Published
2022-12-06
How to Cite
Kossak, V., Herts, A., Stefanchuk, M., Senyk, S., & Zaitseva-Kalaur, I. (2022). Analysis of court decisions in cases on provision of in vitro fertilization services in Ukraine and Europe: Análisis de las decisiones judiciales en casos sobre la prestación de servicios de fertilización in vitro en Ucrania y Europa. Political Questions, 40(75), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.12
Section
Derecho Público