Regulatory policy in the context of effective public governance: evidence of Eastern European Countries

Política regulatoria en el contexto de una administración pública eficaz: la experiencia de Europa del Este

• Irina Kosach Chernihiv National University of Technology, Chernihiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-7140
• Kostiantyn Shaposhnykov Science and Technology of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-9934
• Anton Chub Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-4865
• Inna Yakushko Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-7383
• Dmytro Kotelevets Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-6038
• Oleksandr Lozychenko Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4623-4227

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.26

Keywords: regulatory policy, regulatory influence, public administration, good governance, state regulation

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the regulatory policy of Eastern Europe in the context of effective public administration and to identify areas for ensuring its effectiveness in modern development conditions. The need for conceptual substantiation of the regulatory policy implementation directions, development of appropriate applied nature recommendations taking into account public administration system transformational processes has caused urgency of a theme. The methods of comparative analysis, statistical analysis, method of abstraction and formalization, grouping method, SWOT-analysis method
were used as empirical research methods. It was substantiated that modern science considers this concept in the following aspects: complex, special, normative and globalization. In the context of the Good  Government concept, regulatory policy was analyzed according to the transparency criterion. It was determined that the disadvantage for Ukraine is the lack of regulatory policy transparency, the lack of single database with draft regulatory acts and performance monitoring reports. It is proposed to use
SWOT-analysis as a strategic tool for regulatory impact analysis. Conceptual bases of improvement of regulatory policy realization process have been developed in the following directions: economic development, improvement of internal business environment, harmonization of normative-legal regulation system, stimulation of partnership in the regulatory policy field.

References

ABRAMOVA, Alla; CHUB, Anton; KOTELEVETS, Dmytro; LOZYCHENKO, Oleksandr; ZAICHENKO, Kateryna; KUPCHYSHYNA, Olga. 2021. “Regulatory policy on ensuring sustainability of tax revenues of EU-28 countries” In: Laplage em Revista (International). Vol. 7 (3B), pp. 447-459.

ALEXANDER, Kern. 2010. “International Regulatory Reform and Financial Taxes” In: Journal of international economic law. Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 893-910.

AREFIEVA, Olena; TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana; POPELO, Olha; AREFIEV, Serhii; TKACHENKO, Tetiana. 2021. “The Economic Security System in the Conditions of the Powers Transformation” In: IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 35-42.

AYRES, Ian; BRAITHWAITE, John. 1992. Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press, USA.

BÜTHE, Tim; MATTLI, Walter. 2011. New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton University Press. Princeton, USA.

DERHALIUK, Marta; POPELO, Olha; TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana; MASHNENKOV, Kostyantyn; BEREZOVSKYI, Danylo. 2021. “State policy of the potential-forming space transformation in the context of the regional development intensification” In: CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS. Vol. 39, No. 70, pp. 80-93.

DOINGBUSINESS. Available online. In: https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/doingbusiness. Consultation date: 10/10/2021.

DUBYNA, Maksym; FINAGINA, Olesya; PANKOVA, Liudmyla; MARYCH, Maksym; POPOVA, Liubov; PYLEVYCH, Dmytro. 2021. “Conceptual- theoretical basis of the development of strategic provisions of macroeconomic systems” In: Laplage em Revista (International). Vol. 7(3C), pp. 226-237.

EISNER, Marc Allen; WORSHAM, Jeff; EVAN, Ringquist; FRANCHESCA, Nestor. 2018. Contemporary Regulatory Policy THIRD EDITION Ringquist, and Franchesca Nestor Copyright.

GECHERT, Sebastian; HORN, Gustav; PAETZ, Christoph. 2018. “Long-term effects of fiscal stimulus and austerity in Europe” In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 81, No. 3, 647-666.

GONTA, Olena; SHKARLET, Serhii; DUBYNA, Maksym. 2016. “Peculiarities of system approach use to cognition of economic phenomena” In: Scientific bulletin of Polissia. Vol. 8, pp. 9-17.

LAGODIIENKO, Nataliia; YAKUSHKO, Inna. 2021. “Development of the Taxation System in the Conditions of Digital Transformation of the National Economy” In: Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. Vol. 5, No. 40, pp. 378–388.

MCCONNELL, Campbell; BRUCE, Stanley. 1993. Economics: principles, problems and policies. Hagar-Demos.

OECD. 2021. OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2021, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1787/38b0fdb1-en. Consultation date: 10/10/2021.

POPELO, Olha. 2017. “Methodological approaches to modernization processes of the productive forces in the conditions of Eurointegration” In: Scientific Bulletin of Polissia. Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 218-224.

SHAPOSHNYKOV, Kostiantyn; HOLOVKO, Oleh. 2019. “Public regulation and administration in the sphere of small business” In: Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 236-242.

STIGLITS, Joseph. 1998. Economy of the sovereign sector. Osnovi. New York, USA.