The use of electronic evidence in court: a comparative legal analysis in the world practice
El uso de la prueba electrónica en los tribunales: un análisis jurídico comparativo en la práctica internacional
Abstract
The article is devoted to such a topical issue as the use of electronic evidence in court. The purpose of the article is to determine the basic principles of electronic evidence, study domestic and foreign legislation on the use of electronic evidence in court, determine their place in the system of evidence, and identify problems with evidence in court. It was found that electronic evidence should be understood as factual data that are displayed in digital forms and recorded on any type of media, as well as after processing by electronic computers become possible and accessible to human perception. It has been established that in most of the European countries we study, electronic evidence is unquestionably classified as written and is not singled out. It has been identified that electronic documents have the same legal force in some countries as paper documents. It was concluded that in Azerbaijan the procedure for collecting and examining electronic evidence in domestic proceedings should be improved to avoid various technical errors, as well as to strengthen cybersecurity measures and increase basic knowledge of judges in the field of information technology.
Downloads
References
DOBIE, Armistead. 1939. “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” In: Virginia Law Review. Vol. 25, No. 3, p-. 261-272.
ELISEEV, Nikolai, 2004. Civil Procedure Law of Foreign Countries. p. 6. Available online. In: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20014991. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
HETMANTSEV, Maksym, 2019. “Electronic evidence in civil proceedings: the practice of application of legislative innovations” In: Enterprise, Economy and Law. Vol. 2, pp. 19-23.
IBADZADE, Anar Ganimatoglu, 2016. “The system of evidence in the criminal process of the Republic of Azerbaijan” In: Law and state: theory and practice. Vol. 8, pp. 121-124.
KAZACHUK, Ivan, 2014. “The Use of Electronic Evidence in Evidence in Administrative Tort Procedure” In: LegeasiViata. Vol. 8/3, No. 270, pp. 64-67.
MOSKOVCHUK, Dmytro, 2020. “General Characteristics of Electronic Evidence of the United States and Germany” In: Reforming Civil Procedure Law in Conditions of Integration Processes in Ukraine: Mater. The Yu. S. Chervonyi All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical. Internet- Conference (Odessa, December 18, 2020); under the editorship of Dr. of Law, Professor Yu. Holubeva. Odessa: Phoenix, pp. 37-39. Available online. In: https://hdl.handle.net/11300/14012. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
NECHYPORUK, Yuliia. 2020. “Liability for the destruction of electronic evidence in administrative proceedings” In: State and Regions. Vol. 1, pp. 138-141. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.32840/1813- 338X-2020.1-1.23. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
POLYSHCHUK, Anastasyia; KYLYVNYK, Ekateryna, 2019. “The use of electronic evidence: foreign practice” In: Law Gazette. Asters. Available online. In: https://www.asterslaw.com/ru/press_center/publications/ use_of_electronic_evidence_foreign_practice/. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
SCHLOTTERBECK, Walter B; MANSINNE, Andrew. 1970. The Role of the Department of Defense in Civil Disturbances. Industrial College of the Armed Forces. New York, USA.
THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN, 2000. In: Law No. 907-IQ of the Republic of Azerbaijan of July 14, 2000. Collection of Legislative Acts of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 8. Available online. In: http://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_ id=30420280. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
TIMMERBEIL, Sven. 2003. “The role of expert witnesses in German and US civil litigation” In: Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law. Vol. 9, No. 1, р. 26.
VERNYDUBOV, Ivan; BELIKOVA, Svitlana, 2018. “Electronic evidences: concept, features, and problems of their study by the court” In: Evropskypoliticky a pravnidiskurz. Available online. In: https:// eppd13.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/2018-5-2/42.pdf. Consultation date: 16/11/2021.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)