Normative regulation of witness immunity in international law

Regulación normativa de la inmunidad de testigos en la legislación internacional

Keywords: criminal proceedings, witness, witness immunity, testimony, guarantees

Abstract

Through materialist dialectics, the article is dedicated to the study and solution of theoretical and practical questions related to the right of a person not to declare or give explanations about himself, his relatives, or close relatives. Interested here was the thorough review of the doctrinal sources of this right, the meaning and methodology of its research, the concept and content of the right of a person not to testify, the peculiarities of this right in Ukraine and in the world, its legislation, as well as its guarantee of implementation. In addition, based on the analysis of the legislation of each country, the authors identify the characteristics of the guarantee, analyze the theoretical aspects and the practical problems of granting the police and judicial authorities the right not to declare or give explanations about themselves. It is concluded that the immunity of witnesses means a set of rules that exempts certain groups of witnesses from the obligation to testify in criminal proceedings, as well as from the obligation of the witness to testify against himself. In this sense, immunity for a witness is divided into two types of imperatives: (absolute, unconditional) and device (relative, conditional).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yevhen Priakhin, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology of the Faculty No 1 of the Institute for Training Specialists for the National Police of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Andrii Lytvyn, National Police of the Volyn Region, Volyn Region, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, Head of the Kovel Regional Police Department of the Main Directorate of the National Police of the Volyn Region; Kovel, Volyn Region, Ukraine.

Nataliia Kononenko, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, senior lecturer at the Department of Criminology and Forensic Medicine, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Yevdokiia Buzhdyhanchuk, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, senior lecturer at the Department of Criminal Procedure, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Irina Dubivka, National Police of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of Science in law, Senior investigator in especially important cases of the 1st department of the pre-trial investigation department of the National Police of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

APAROVA, Tatiana. 1996. Courts and litigation. England, Wales, Scotland. M. Institute of International law and economics. Triada, LTD. London, England.

BELKOVA, Olga. 2004. “Theoretical and practical aspects of the right of a witness to refuse to testify about himself, family members and close relatives” In: Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law No. 2, pp. 102104.

BEREZHANSKAYA, Victoria. 2019. The constitutional right of a person not to give testimony or explanations about himself, family members or close relatives and his provision in Ukraine. Dissertation of the doctor of legal sciences. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.

BRYSON, William. 1992. UK the American Judicial System. In: Rule of law: a collection, translated from English. Progress. Moscow, Russia.

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS. No. 295-З. 1999. Available online. In: https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=hk9900295. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 2014. Available online. In: http://www.online.zakon.kz/ Document/?doc_id=1008442#sub_id=590000. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA. 1992. Available online. In: https://www.lrs.lt/home/Konstitucija/Konstitucija_RU.htm. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CONSTITUTIONS OF FOREIGN STATES: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. GERMANY. ITALY. JAPAN. CANADA. 1997. Allowance MAKLAKOV, Viacheslav. 2nd ed. BEC. Moscow, Russia.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF GEORGIA. 2017. Available online. In: https://www.matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/90034/37/ ru/pdf. Consultation date: 22/06/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA. 1998. No. ЗР-248. Available online. In: http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc. fwx?rgn=7460. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2012. No. 4651–VI. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. Consultation date: 22/04/2021.

FILIMONOV, Boris. 1994. Foundations of the theory of evidence in German criminal procedure. Moscow. Russia.

GALAGAN, Oleksandr; SAVCHENKO, Volodymyr. 2011. Protection of the rights and freedoms of criminal justice in Ukraine and Germany. IvanoFrankivsk: Misto – NV. Ukraine.

GUTSENKO, Konstantin; GOLOVKO, Leonid; FILIMONOV, Boris. 2002. Criminal proceedings of Western states. Zertsalo-M. Moscow, Russia.

ISRAEL, Jerold; KAMISAR, Yale; LAFAVE, Waync; KING, Nancy. 2018. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution, Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text. (American Casebook Series). Minnesota, United States of America.

KALINOVSKY, Konstantin. 2000. Criminal proceedings of modern foreign states. Petrus Publishing House. Petrozavodsk, Russia.

KHARITONOVA, Marina. 2019. “Witness immunity as an element of the principle of protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in criminal proceedings” In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings. No. 3, pp. 239-248.

LOSKUTOVA, Tatianna. 2005. Witness and his testimony in the criminal proceedings of England and the United States: Dissertation of the doctor of legal sciences. Moscow. Russia.

MAKHOV, Vadim; PESHKOV, Maksim. 1998. US Criminal Procedure (pre– trial stages). Intel–Synthesis Business School. Russia, Moscow.

MISES, Ludwig. 1997. Liberalism in Classical Tradition. Boston, USA.

RULE 6003. INTERIM AND FINAL RELIEF IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE CASE. In: https://www.law.cornell. edu/rules/frbp/rule_6003. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

UDALOVA, Larisa. 2004. “Immunity in criminal proceedings” In: Law of Ukraine. No. 4, p. 75.

VOLKOTRUB, Serhii. 2005. Immunity in the criminal process of Ukraine: monograph Kharkiv. Consum. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

VOLOSOVA, Nonna. 2011. Provisions of witness immunity in criminal proceedings in Russia and foreign countries: monograph. IP Osinochkin Ya.V. Orenburg, Russia.

VOLOSOVA, Nonna; FEDOROVA, Olga. 2008. US criminal procedure law: state law, general characteristics, comparative analysis: monograph. Yurlitinform. Moscow, Russia.

СONSTITUTIONS OF THE EU. Available online. In: https://www.mid. ru/evropejskij-souz-es/-/asset_publisher/6OiYovt2s4Yc/content/ id/440540. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.
Published
2022-02-19
How to Cite
Priakhin, Y., Lytvyn, A., Kononenko, N., Buzhdyhanchuk, Y., & Dubivka, I. (2022). Normative regulation of witness immunity in international law: Regulación normativa de la inmunidad de testigos en la legislación internacional. Political Questions, 40(72), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.11
Section
Derecho Público