Cultura de las técnicas jurídicas: dominantes clave en el sistema jurídico ruso moderno
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the conceptual and specific analysis of the emergence of the culture of legal techniques under the conditions of a new technological form. The identification and analysis of key types of culture of legal techniques, allows to show their specificity following typological groups. Its systemic
unity, which has its specificities, can be considered as the second dominant of the culture of legal techniques. The article further offers a primary doctrinal definition of the concept of culture of legal techniques based on the identified dominant characteristics and manifestations of the culture of legal techniques, studied in the context of the search for ways of effective functioning of the system of power and powerless principles in the Russian legal system. This phenomenon is in the formation stage. The authors have used dialectical, historical- political, formal-legal, and comparative-legal methods. It is concluded that a promising systematic understanding of the essence and meaning of the culture of legal techniques will help to improve the legal culture as a whole and thus increase the effectiveness of the law in modern society.
Downloads
References
BARANOV, Vladimir Mikhailovich. 2016. “Culture and legal technique: Introductory remarks” In: Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. No. 10, pp. 10-22.
BARANOV, Vladimir Mikhailovich. 2017. “Norm-writer as a profession” In: Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. No. 6, pp. 16-29.
BOGOLYUBOV, S.A. 2006. “Culture of legislative technique” In: Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, No. 10, pp. 52-55.
BOLDYREV, S.N. 2011. “Legal culture of society and culture of legal technology” In: Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. Vol. 15, No. 22. pp. 36-40.
BONDAREV, A.S. 2010. “Legal culture and products of legal culture in their relationship” In: Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. Vol. 2, No. 8, pp. 8-15.
COTTERRELL, R. 2006. Law, Culture and Society. Aldershot. UK, London. COWAN, D. 2004. “Legal Consciousness: Some Observations” In: Modem Law Review. Vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 122-139.
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. UK, London.
FROLOVA, E.A. 2017. Methodology and philosophy of law: from Descartes to Russian neo-Kantians. Monograph. Moscow, Russia.
GIBSON, James L; CALDEIRA, Gregory A. 1996. The Legal Cultures of Europe, Law & Society Review. Berkeley Law. California, USA.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. 2000. Moral awareness and communicative action. Norma. Saint Petersburg, Russia.
KARASIK, V.I. 2002. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Peremena. Volgograd, Russia.
KARTASHOV, V.N., BAUMOVA, M.G. 2008. Legal culture: concept, structure, functions. Monograph. Yaroslavl, Russia.
MALTSEV, G.V. 2013. Cultural traditions of law. Monograph. Moscow, Russia. NELKEN, D. 1997. “Puzzling Out Legal Culture: A Comment on Blankenburg” In: Comparing Legal Cultures. Brookfield. Toronto, Canada.
PENTO, R; GRAVITTS, M. 1972. Social Science Methods. Spectral. Moscow, Russia.
PETRUCHAK, L.A. 2012. Legal culture of modern Russian society: theoretical and legal research. Dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Moscow, Russia.
ROSEN, L. 2006. Law as Culture. Princeton. New Jersey, USA.
TIKHOMIROV, YU.A. 2015. Law: Forecasts and Risks: Monograph. Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Russia.
TOSUNYAN, G.A; SANNIKOVA, L.V. 2018. “The culture of lawmaking in modern Russia” In: Gosudarstvo i pravo. No. 3, pp. 28-34.
VYZHLETSOV, G.P. 1996. Axiology of culture. Norma. Saint Petersburg, Russia. WILHELMSSON, Thomas; PAUNIO, Elina; POHJOLAINEN, Annika. 2007. Private Law and the Many Cultures of Europe. Available online. In: https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/214253. Date of consultation: 12/12/2020.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)