Discursos neoliberales posmodernos frente a teorías y prácticas posfeministas

Tetiana  Vlasova; Olha  Vlasova; Nataliia  Bilan; Inna  Zavaruieva; Larysa  Bondarenko

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3971.28

Tetiana Vlasova Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-5733
Olha Vlasova Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-0853
Nataliia Bilan Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-7831
Inna Zavaruieva Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-9481
Larysa Bondarenko Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-8480

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.28

Keywords: life world, virtual economies, problematization of theory, social construction, pop-culture

Abstract

The aim of the articleis consideredthe conceptualreconstruction of the relationship between postmodern feminism and the notional field of contemporary neoliberalism. The analytical methods used were based on the assertion that the complexity of textual interventions requires interdisciplinary approaches. The findings and results of the research carried out accentuate that COVID-19 has contributed greatly to the contradictions of the current global landscape in the contexts of neoliberalism and feminism. Feminism asserts as a discourse that the conceptual apparatus of neoliberalism has not served its goals; in fact, postfeminism has not yet chosen its route in the neoliberal context. The assumption that women cannot win their “vindication battle” in the world where “the game is fixed” continues to be taken as an axiom, even though the coronavirus pandemic causes some observers to proclaim the return of influential governments and social contracts. The latter accentuates the role of female representation in neoliberal social, cultural, and political discourses at the global level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Vlasova, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Doctor of Philosophic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Philology and Translation Department, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Olha Vlasova, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Candidate of Philosophic Sciences, Associate Professor at the Philosophy and Sociology Department, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Nataliia Bilan, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Philology and Translation Department, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Inna Zavaruieva, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Philology and Translation Department, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Larysa Bondarenko, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Philology and Translation Department, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Dnipro, Ukraine.

References

ALLAN, Alexandra. 2010. “Picturing success: Young Femininities and the (im)possibilities of Academic Achievements in Selective Single-sex Education” In: International Studies in Sociology of Education. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39-54.

APPIGNANESI, Richard; GARRATT, Chris. 2006. Introducing Postmodernism. Icon Books. London, UK.

BUTLER, Judith. 2006. Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence. Verso. Brooklyn, USA.

BUTLER, Judith. 2018. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, USA.

DAVIS, William. 2017. The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. SAGE Publications Ltd. New York, USA.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Felix. 2009. What is Philosophy? Academic Project. Moscow, Russia.

DYAKOV, Aleksandr. 2013. Gilles Deleuze. The Philosophy of Difference. Alethea. St. Petersburg, Russia.

FAULKS, Sebastian. 2010. A Week in December. Vintage Books. New York, USA.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. 2006. The End of History and the Last Man. Free Press. Washington. USA.

GENDER IN DETAIL. 2020. Available online: https://genderindetail.org.ua. Consultation date: 02/02/2021.

GILBERT, Jeremy. 2016. Neoliberal Culture. Lawrence and Wishart. London, UK.

GILL, Rosalind. ed. 2011. New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

GLOBAL GENDER GAP INDEX. 2020. Available online: https: // gtmarket.ru/ ratings/global-gender-gap-index/info. Consultation date: 02/02/2021.

GONZALEZ, George. 2019. Popular Culture and the Political Values of Neoliberalism. Lexington Books. Lanham, MD.

HALBERSTAM, Jack. 2012. Gaga Feminism: Sex, Gender, and the End of Normal. Beacon Press. Boston, USA.

HARVEY, David. 2007. Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

JAMESON, Fredric. 2009. Postmodernism or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Verso. Brooklyn, USA.

SCHWAB, Klaus; MALLERET, Thierry. 2020. COVID-19: The Great Reset. ISNB Agentur Schweiz. Zürich, Switzerland.

SIM, Stuart. 1995. Derrida and the End of History (Postmodern Encounters). Totem Books. Flint, USA.

SVASYAN, Karen. 2010. Phenomenological epistemology. Academic Project, Alma Mater. Moscow, Russia.