La Influencia del Enfoque de Coalición en la Política Estadounidense sobre los procesos de Integración en Europa en la Era Post bipolar

Keywords: coalition approach, international relations, was post-bipolar, political integration, geopolitics

Abstract

The article examines the impact of the coalition approach in US policy on integration processes in Europe in the post-bipolar era. The aim of this article was to identify the peculiarities of the political situation in the world after a period of escalation of the nuclear conflict. It involved an analysis of sources in the field of coalition approach research in the United States, as well as a comparison of its impact on the political situation and European Union law. The author concluded that there is a lack of proper research in the field of the impact of the coalition approach in US policy in the post-bipolar era, and its impact on integration processes in Europe. Comparing the experience of the EU and the US, it was determined that the awareness of nuclear danger affected the development of a coalition approach in US policy. The study resulted in the identified specifics of the EU’s security policy under the influence of the US coalition approach, where the need to ensure stability and armed security is crucial. Prospects for further research include identifying US influence on Eastern countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olha Y. Kravchuk, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Social and Humanitarian Sciences, Educational and Scientific Humanitarian Institute, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, 54025, Mykolayiv, Ukraine.

Volodymyr I. Zabolotnyuk, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD in History, Deputy Chief of Research of the Land Forces Scientific Center, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy, 79026, Lviv, Ukraine.

Yuliia V. Kobets, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Political Institutions and Processes, Faculty of History, Politology and International Relations, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 76018, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

Oksana I. Lypchuk, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of History, Politology and International Relations, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 76018, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

Ivanna I. Lomaka, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of History, Politology and International Relations, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 76018, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

References

BACCARINI, Mariana Pimenta Oliveira. 2018. “Informal reform of the United Nations security council” In: Contexto Internacional. Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 97-115.

BIALASIEWICZ, Luiza; CAMPBELL, David; ELDEN, Stuart; GRAHAM, Stephen; JEFFREY, Alex; WILLIAMS, Alison J. 2007. “Performing security: the imaginative geography of current US strategy” In: Political Geography Vol. 26, pp. 405-422.

BROOKS, Stephen G; WOHLFORTH, William C. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton University Press. Princeton, USA.

DAGUERRE, Anne. 2020. “Policy styles and welfare reform in Britain and the USA: The conservative-led coalition government and the Obama administration compared” In: Journal of Social Security Law. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 130-158.

EUROPEAN UNION. 2012. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2012/C 326/. Available online. In: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT. Consultation date: 28/01/2021.

FARD, Rebin. 2019. “The new foreign policy pendulum: Geopolitical codes of German foreign policy in the post bipolar world order” In: Politics in Central Europe. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 383‬-418.

FERGUSON, Yale H. 2008. “Approaches to defining “empire” and characterizing United States influence in the contemporary world” In: International Studies Perspectives. Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 272–280.

FESENKO, Mykola Vasylyovych. 2017. “Phenomenon of postglobalization in the context of a new international order formation” In: Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: History. Political Studies. Vol. 19, pp. 266-274.

FLOCKHART, Trine. 2014. Post-bipolar challenges. New visions and new activities. In: Sebastian Mayer (Ed.), NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics: NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New Security Challenges Series (pp. 71- 88). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

GLEBOV, Sergiy. 2014. The beginning of Ukraine and the end of the post- bipolar world. In: Viktor Stepanenko and Yaroslav Pylynskyi (Eds.) Ukraine after Euromaidan: Challenges and Hopes (pp. 105-114). Peter Lang. Bern, Switzerland.

GLEBOV, Sergiy. 2019. The EU’s policy of integration in the context of European regionalization. Olga Brusylovska, and Igor Koval, (Eds.), Prospects of Development in EU Politics: Global and Regional Dimentions (pp. 20- 32). Odesa Mechnikov National University Press. Odesa, Ukraine.

IGNATOV, Ivan Alekseevich. 2020. “Japanese-Mongolian relations in the post- bipolar period within the context of Mongolia’s “third neighbor” policy” In: Japanese Studies in Russia. Vol. 1, pp. 69-84.

KONONENKO, Serhiy Volodymyrovych, 2018. “The war in the international politics: technology, culture, organizing” In: Scientific Notes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Vol. 41, pp. 53-63.

MAJINGE, Charles Riziki. 2011. “Regional arrangements and the maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the African Union peace and security council” In: Canadian Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 48, pp. 97-149.

MARSHANIA, Zurab. 2011. “The phenomenon of post-bipolar regionalism in Europe” In: The Caucasus & Globalization. Vol. 5, No. 1-2, pp. 23-34.

MARTIN, Lisa L; SIMMONS, Beth A. 1998. “Theories and empirical studies of international institutions” In: International Organization. Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 729-757.

MAYER, Sebastian. 2014. Introduction: NATO as an organization and bureaucracy. In: Sebastian Mayer (Ed.), NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New Security Challenges Series (pp. 1-27). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

MCLAUGHLIN, Danielle M; CUTTS, Bethany B. 2018. “Neither knowledge deficit nor NIMBY: Understanding opposition to hydraulic fracturing as a nuanced coalition in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (USA)” In: Environmental Management. Vol. 62, pp. 305–322.

MISHRA, Vinod K; VERMA, Dinesh C; WILLIAMS, Christopher. 2017 Improving security in coalition tactical environments using an SDN approach. In: Shao Ying Zhu, Sandra Scott-Hayward, Ludovic Jacquin and Richard Hill (Eds.), Guide to Security in SDN and NFV. Computer Communications and Networks (pp 273-298). Springer. Cham.

MORAVCSIK, Andrew. 1997. “Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics” In: International Organization. Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 513-553.

OGUNBANJO, Martin Abimbola. 2021. “Neo-realism and neo-liberalism in global politics: towards assessing the intellectual siblings” In: KIU Journal of Social Sciences, Suppl. l, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 57-76.

PIREN, Mariya Ivanivna. 2000. Conflict and Management Roles. Socio- Psychological Analysis. Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Kyiv, Ukraine.

PRANTL, Jochen. 2005. “Informal groups of states and the UN security council” In: International Organization. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 559-592.

RUDKO, Serhiy Oleksiyovych. 2012. Foreign Policy of Western European Countries during Post-Bipolar Period. Textbook for the Course. Publishing House of Ostroh Academy National University. Ostroh, Ukraine.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. 2004. International law and international relations theory: A prospectus. In: Eyal Benvenisti and Moshe Hirsch (Eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 16-49). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. SUBOTIN, Andriy. 2019. “Future of US hegemony” In: Actual Problems of International Relations. Vol. 139, pp. 4-12.

TELÒ, Mario. 2010. International Relations: A European Perspective, 1st edition. Routledge. London, UK.

VAKARCHUK, Kateryna Vasylivna. 2018. “Argentina’s foreign policy in the post-bipolar period” In: Odesa National University Herald. Series: Sociology and Political Sciences. Vol. 23, No. 2(31), pp. 115-127.

VENTURA, Carla Aparecida Arena; CAVALCANTI, Melissa Franchini; DE PAULA, Verônica Angélica Freitas. 2006. “The systems approach to the pluralist theory of international relations: a case study of the European Union” In: Systemic Practice and Action Research. Vol. 19, pp. 475–487.

VOLODINA, Maryna Oleksandrivna. 2012. “NATO in the in the system of dominant foreign policy priorities of the United States and Great Britain in the 1990s” In: Istorychni Zapysky. Vol. 35, pp. 24-32.

WEIBLE, Christopher M; JENKINS-SMITH, Hank C. 2016. The advocacy coalition framework: an approach for the comparative analysis of contentious policy issues. In: B. Guy Peters and Philippe Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy (pp. 15-34). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

ZARTMAN, William (Ed.). 2009. Imbalance of Power: US Hegemony and International Order. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Boulder, USA.
Published
2021-12-16
How to Cite
Kravchuk, O. Y., Zabolotnyuk, V. I., Kobets, Y. V., Lypchuk, O. I., & Lomaka, I. I. (2021). La Influencia del Enfoque de Coalición en la Política Estadounidense sobre los procesos de Integración en Europa en la Era Post bipolar. Political Questions, 39(71), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.09
Section
Derecho Público