Obtaining the testimony of a minor during the pre-trial investigation under the laws of Ukraine

Viktoriia  Zarubei; Yuliia  Komarynska; Andrii  Babenko; Yuliia  Sukhomlyn; Nataliia  Kononenko

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3970.23

Viktoriia Zarubei National Academy of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-967X
Yuliia Komarynska National Academy of Internal Affair https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-1816
Andrii Babenko Odesa State University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9498-2484
Yuliia Sukhomlyn National Academy of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5699-6914
Nataliia Kononenko National Academy of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-3958

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.23

Palabras clave: prueba, testimonio juvenil, interrogatorio de un menor, averiguación previa al juicio, legislación de menores en Ucrania

Resumen

El artículo científico, basado en las disposiciones de la teoría del procedimiento penal, criminología, psicología, revela los problemas de obtener el testimonio de un menor durante la investigación previa al juicio según las leyes de Ucrania. En particular, se observa que el método de obtención del testimonio debe basarse en la edad y situación procesal del menor, lo que requiere un enfoque especial teniendo en cuenta el estado vulnerable, la inmadurez social y el riesgo de vulneración de los derechos y libertades de tales personas. El estudio utilizó métodos científicos generales para determinar ciertas categorías legales que caracterizan el procedimiento de interrogatorio de un menor, como también métodos especiales. La práctica de introducir «salas verdes» en el campo de la justicia penal se reconoce como prometedora, ya que el entorno del niño durante las acciones procesales pertinentes es extremadamente importante para establecer contacto con el niño. Se concluye que, la falta de conveniencia de clasificar a un menor sospechoso como sujeto para ser interrogado en el tribunal durante una instrucción previa al juicio está justificada, ya que sería contrario a los requisitos de la ley sobre la inmediatez del examen de las pruebas en el tribunal.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Viktoriia Zarubei , National Academy of Internal Affairs

Candidate of legal sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Yuliia Komarynska, National Academy of Internal Affair

Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Educational and Scientific Institute No 3 for educational and methodological and scientific work, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Andrii Babenko, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs

Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of criminal law and criminology, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine.

Yuliia Sukhomlyn, National Academy of Internal Affairs

Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Procedure, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Nataliia Kononenko, National Academy of Internal Affairs

Candidate of legal sciences, senior lecturer at the Department of Criminology and Forensic Medicine, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Citas

BABENKO, Olga. 2020. Pre-trial investigation of a minor suspect: dissertation of the doctor of philosophy. Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Mariupol, Ukraine.

CHORNIY, Gennadiy. 1998. Methods of investigation of robberies with penetration into housing: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE: LAW OF UKRAINE. 2012. № 4651-VI. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/4651-17. Consultation date: 07/03/2021.

ENIKEEV, Ziniviy. 2002. The mechanism of criminal prosecution: a textbook. Bashkir University. Ufa, Russia.

GRISHCHENKO, Olecsandr. 2021. The use of ballistic accounting of the Expert Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in the investigation of criminal offenses: dissertation of the doctor of philosophy. National Academi of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KANEVSKY, Lev. 1978. Organization of investigation and tactics of investigative actions in cases of minors. Bashkir State University. Ufa, Russia.

KOVALENKO, Valentyn; UDALOVA, Larysa; PYSMENNYY, Dmytro. 2013. Criminal proceedings: a textbook. Center for Educational Literature. Kyiv, Ukraine.

KUZNETSOVA, Svetlana; KOBTSOVA, Tatiana. 2004. Tactics of interrogation of minors. Ekzamen. Moscow, Russia.

LEVI, Aleksandr; PICHKALEVA, Galina; SELIVANOV, Nikolay. 1987. Receipt and verification of testimony by the investigator. Legal literature. Moscow, Russia.

NIKANDROV, Viacheslav. 1993. “Involvement of parents of juvenile suspects and accused in criminal proceedings”In: State and law. № 8. P. 105.

ON THE PECULIARITIES OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ON THE PROTECTION OF THE INTERESTS OF CHILDREN AND COMBATING VIOLENCE: Order of the Prosecutor General. 2020. № 509. Available online. In: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0509905-20. Consultation date: 07/03/2021.

ORLOV, Yuriy. 2000. Fundamentals of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Scientific and practical manual. Prospekt. Moscow, Russia.

PALYUKH, Andriy. 2016. Participation of the prosecutor in evidence during the pre-trial investigation: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Lviv Polytechnic National University. Lviv, Ukraine.

PANCHUK, Oksana. 2013. Providing a witness with legal assistance in criminal proceedings: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Kyiv, Ukraine.

PYASKOVSKY, Vadym. 2004. Methods of investigating human trafficking: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Kyiv, Ukraine.

RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 2018. in case № 760/13866/15-k (proceedings № 51-927km18). Available online. In: http://reyestr.court. gov.ua/Review/72642008. Consultation date: 07/03/2021.

RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 2018. in case № 158/2313/15-k (proceedings № 51-3021km18). Available online. In: http://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/77393408. Consultation date: 07/03/2021.

RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 2019. in the case № 243/10386/17 (proceedings № 51-4420km19Z). Available online. In: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86755073. Consultation date: 07/03/2021.

SERGEEVA, Diana; STARENKY, Oleksandr. 2018. Theoretical and applied research of the doctrine of material evidence in criminal proceedings. In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings. № 1. pp. 212–213.

SERGEEVA, Diana; STARENKYY Oleksandr. 2018. Theoretical and applied research of the doctrine of material evidence in criminal proceedings. In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings. № 1. pp. 212–213.

SHABALIN, Vladimir. 1975. Documentary fixation of evidence (forensic and procedural aspects): abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Moscow, Russia.

SMYK, Svetlana. 2018. Grounds and procedural procedure for interrogation at the stage of pre-trial investigation in court: dissertation of the doctor of philosophy. Kyiv. Tarasa Shevchenko National University. Kyiv, Ukraine.

SOLOV`EV, Аleksandr. 2002. Procedural, psychological and tactical bases of interrogation at the preliminary investigation. Moscow. Russia.

TURKOT, Mykola; SHCHERBAKOVA, Ganna. 2015. “Tactics of presentation of evidence by the prosecutor during the trial of criminal proceedings against minors”In: Scientific journal of the National Academy of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine. № 1, pp. 170–171.

VASQUE, Ekaterina. 2010. “Strategies of psychological influence during the interrogation: theoretical and applied aspects” In: Volga scientific journal. №1 (13). pp. 259–260.

YAKOVINA, Orest. 2020. Investigation of robberies committed by minors: dissertation of the doctor of philosophy. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.