Administrative reforms in Eastern Europe: A comparative legal analysis
Abstract
The objective of the article was to analyze the legal regulation of the decentralization reform in Eastern Europe and its impact on the unemployment rate. Methodologically, statistical analysis, hypothetical-deductive method and correlation were used. It was found that the first stage of the reform of the New Civil Service in Poland, Ukraine, Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Latvia, and Bulgaria began in 1990, but can be called an informal preparatory stage. It is determined that the process of implementation of administrative reforms is influenced by a series of factors: historical, economic, geographical. It is concluded that there is no positive correlation between the effectiveness of public administration and the effectiveness of local self-government in all the countries studied. The reform of decentralization has been shown to have a negative impact on employment. In addition, it found that Poland is the most stable country among those studied, with a high level of efficiency of local self-government. La more negative correlation between the efficiency index of local self-government and employment, and the most positive correlation between local and unemployment rate.
Downloads
References
AUCOIN, Peter. 1990. “Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums” In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 115- 137.
AZFAR, Omar; KAHKONEN, Satu; LANYI, Anthony; MEAGHER, Patrick; RUTHERFORD, Diana. 2004. “Devolution and Development”, 1st Edition. Routledge, London, New York.
BARTLETT, William; ĐULIĆ, Katarina; KMEZIC, Sanja. 2020. “The impact of fiscal decentralisation on local economic development in Serbia” In: Journal of Local Self-Government. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 143-163.
BARTOLINI, David; NINKA, Eniel; ANTOLIN, Raffaella. 2019. “Tax decentralization, labour productivity, and employment in OECD countries” In: Applied Economics. Vol. 51, No. 34, pp. 3710-3729.
BOOCKMANN,Bernhard;THOMSEN,StephanL.;WALTER,Thomas;GOBEL, Christian; HUBER, Martin. 2015. “Should welfare administration be centralized or decentralized? Evidence from a policy experiment” In: German Economic Review. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 13–42.
CAIDEN, Gerald E. 2001. “Administrative reform” In: Public Administration and Public Policy. Vol. 94, pp. 681-693.
CHAND, Anand; NAIDU, Suwastika. 2020. New public management model and performance appraisal system. In Ali Farazmand (ed.), “Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance.” Springer, Cham.
CHURSKI, Pawel. 2002. “Unemployment and labour-market policy in the new Voivodeship system in Poland” In: European Planning Studies. Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 745–763.
EBINGER, Falk; KUHLMANN, Sabine; BOGUMIL, Joerg. 2018. “Territorial reforms in Europe: effects on administrative performance and democratic participation” In: Local Government Studies. Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1–23.
GARRETT, Geoffrey; RODDEN, Jonathan. 2000. “Globalization and Decentralization”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago, IL on April 27-30, 2000.
GOEL, Rajeev K.; MAZHAR, Unnad; NELSON, Michael A; RAM, Rati. 2017. “Different forms of decentralization and their impact on government performance: Micro-level evidence from 113 countries” In: Economic Modelling. Vol. 62, pp. 171–183.
HAMMERSCHMID, Gerhard; VAN DE WALE, Andrews; RHYS, Steven; BEZES, Philippe. 2016. “Introduction: Public Administration Reforms in Europe. Public Administration Reforms in Europe. The View from the Top.” Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham, Northampton, UK.
HARGUINDÉGUY, Jean-Baptiste Paul; COLE, Alistair; PASQUIER, Romain. 2019. “The variety of decentralization indexes: A review of the literature” In: Regional & Federal Studies. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 1–24.
KURILOV, Yuriy. 2019. “Administrative reform in Ukraine: from its origins to the future” In: Public Administration Aspects. Vol. 7, No. 9-10, pp. 62- 78.
LAPUENTE, Victor; VAN DE WALLE, Steven. 2020. “The effects of new public management on the quality of public services” In: Governance. Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 461-475.
MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ, Jorge; LAGO-PEÑAS, Santiago; SACCHI, Agnese. 2016. “The impact of fiscal decentralization: a survey” In: Journal of Economic Surveys. Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1095–1129.
MERGELE, Lukas; WEBER, Michael 2020. “Public employment services under decentralization: Evidence from a natural experiment” In: Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 182, No. 2, pp. 104–113.
NEPRAM, Damodar; SINGH, Salam Prakash; JAMAN, Samsur; 2021. “The Effect of Government Expenditure on Unemployment in India: A State Level Analy” In: Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 0763–0769.
NIEMINEN, Jeremias. 2020. “Decentralized employment services and active labor market policy: Evidence from Finnish municipal employment trials”. Master’s thesis. University of Turku. Turku, Finland.
NIKOS, Michalopoulos. 2001. “Trends of administrative reform in Europe: Towards administrative convergence?” In: International Public Management Review. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 39-53.
PSYCHARIS, Yannis; ZOI, Maria; ILIOPOULOU, Stavroula. 2015. “Decentralization and local government fiscal autonomy: evidence from the Greek municipalities” In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 262–280.
SEROHINA, Natalia O. 2020. “Decentralization and its impact on effective employment” In: Ekonomika ta Derzava. Vol. 1, 2, No. 14, pp. 79-83.
SUZUKI, K., AVELLANEDA, C. N. 2018. “New Public Management and Municipal Performance: Do NPM Reforms Boost Performance?” Available online. In: https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden. nl/handle/1887/80372. Date of consultation: 30/06/2021. Date of consultation: 30/11/2020.
WEBER, Michael. 2016. The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Decentralizing Public Employment Services. ifo Working Paper Series 209. Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. Leibniz.
WORLD BANK/ 2019a. Local Government Index. Available online. In: https://govdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/hc9f5a751?country=UKR&indicator=41980&countries=BGR,ROU,CZE,LVA,POL,SVN& viz=line_chart&years=2005,2018. Date of consultation: 30/02/2021.
WORLD BANK. 2019b. Government Efficiency. Available online. In: https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/h8125e315?country= ROU&indicator=40979&viz=line_chart&years=2007,2016. Date of consultation: 30/02/2021.
WORLD BANK. 2021. Employment to Population Ratio, 15+, total (%) (Modeled ILO Estimate). Available online. In: https://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.ZS?end=2020&locations=RO&start=2005 Date of consultation: 30/02/2021.
WORLD BANK GROUP. (n. d.) Administrative Decentralization. Available online. URL: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/ decentralization/admin.htm Date of consultation: 30/02/2021.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (n. d.). “Health Laws and Universal Health Coverage.” Available online. In: https://www.who.int/health- laws/topics/governance-decentralisation/en/#:~:text=There%20 are%20three%20major%20forms,levels%20of%20a%20national%20 government Date of consultation: 30/11/2020.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)