Reflections on the respect of the rights of citizens during judicial decisions of execution
Abstract
The objective of the article was to analyze the problematic aspects of the judicial executive process, considering its properties and the classification of its stages. The methodological basis of the study are the general and special methods of scientific knowledge (inductive, analytical, hermeneutic, systemic and others). The results of the study include the analysis of scientific approaches to the essence, properties, classification of stages of the executive process and argumentation of theoretical proposals and informed practices. Moreover, the authors' conclusions on certain topics are set out, a new original definition of "stages of the executive process” and their original new classification is based. The practical importance of the results is that the conclusions and proposals made significantly enrich procedural science during the implementation of judicial decisions; it will be useful for the subjects of enforcement proceedings (implementing agents, parties to enforcement proceedings) in the exercise of their procedural rights and the performance of their procedural functions. The conclusions presented based on the analysis can be used to generalize executive practice.
Downloads
References
BUSEL, Viacheslav. 2003. Large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. Perun. Kyiv, Ukraine.
FURSA, Svitlana; FURSA, Yevhen; SHCHERBAK, Svitlana. 2008. Laws of Ukraine "On state enforcement service", "On enforcement proceedings", "On enforcement of decisions and application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights": scientific and practical commentary. CST. Kyiv, Ukraine.
FURSA, Svitlana; SHCHERBAK, Svitlana. 2002. Enforcement proceedings in Ukraine. Attica. Kyiv, Ukraine.
IHONIN, Ruslan. 2007. Organizational and legal bases of activity of subjects of executive proceedings. National University of State Tax Service of Ukraine. Irpin, Ukraine.
KALININ, Roman. 2013. “Completion of enforcement proceedings under the legislation of Ukraine as a kind of administrative procedure” In: Bulletin of Zaporizhia National University. Juridical Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 69-75.
ANATOLII, Kyslyi; PYSMENNA, Mariia; KOLOMOIETS, Oleksandr; VOLOBUIEVA, Olena; DAVYDENKO, Valerii. 2020. “Educational processes of training, retraining and advanced training of private detectives in Ukraine” En: Cuestiones Políticas. Disponible en línea. En: DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.38e.28. Vol. 38, No. 36 (especial), pp. 421-435.
KOMAROV, Viacheslav. 2011. Course of civil procedure. Pravo. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
KOVALENKO, Valentyn; UDALOVA, Larysa; PYSMENNYI, Dmytro. 2013. Criminal proceedings. Center for Educational Literature. Kyiv, Ukraine.
KRUPNOVA, Liubov. 2017. “Theoretical and legal characteristics of the stages of the administrative procedure for initiating enforcement proceedings” In: Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko. Vol. 3, pp. 123-131.
LAW OF UKRAINE. 2016. On enforcement proceedings, No. 1404-VIII. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19#Text. Consultation date: 17/05/2020.
MAKUSHEV, Petro. 2017. State executive service in Ukraine: administrative and legal research. Zaporizhzhia National University. Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine.
MINKA, Tetiana. 2017. Administrative procedural law. Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. Dnipro, Ukraine.
ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE. 2016. Regulations on the automated system of enforcement proceedings, No. 2432/5. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1126-16#n16. Consultation date: 28/05/2020.
OSIPOV, Yurii. 1978. “Elements and stages of application of the norms of the Soviet civil procedural law. Problems of applying the norms of civil procedural law” In: Scientific Works of the Sverdlovsk Law Institute. Vol. 48, pp. 42-44.
SHCHERBAK, Svitlana. 2011. “The content of the executive process” In: Legal Bulletin of the Ukrainian Academy of Banking. Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 15-19.
TATSII, Vasyl; HROSHEVYI, Yurii; KAPLINA, Oksana; SHYLO, Olha. 2013. Criminal proceedings. Law. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
THE CASE OF HORNSBY V. GREECE. 1997. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ 980_079#Text. Consultation date: 08/05/2020.
THE CASE OF ROMASHOV V. UKRAINE (APPLICATION NO. 67534/01). 2004. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_227?find=1&text=%E2%E8%EA%EE%ED#w164. Consultation date: 09/05/2020.
THE CASE OF YURIY MYKOLAYOVYCH IVANOV V. UKRAINE (APPLICATION NO. 40450/04). 2009. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_479?find=1&text=%E2%E8%EA%EE%ED#w1106. Consultation date: 09/05/2020.
VAGANOVA, Olga I; ILYASHENKO, Lyubov I; SMIRNOVA, Zhanna V; BYSTROVA, Natalia V; KAZNACHEEVA, Svetlana N. 2019. “Students’ creative abilities development in higher educational institution” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol 8, No 22, pp. 701-710.
ZELENKOVA, Inna. 2017. The procedure for recovery of the debtor's property in the enforcement process. Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytsky. Kyiv, Ukraine.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
