Improving mechanisms of social partnership in the system of «government- business-civil society»in the context of European integration
Mejora de los mecanismos de colaboracion social en el sistema «gobierno-empresa-sociedad civil» en el contexto de la integracion europea
Resumen
El artículo examina la evolución de las relaciones políticas entre el Estado y las empresas en Ucrania, en las condiciones del corporativismo estatal. El propósito del artículo fue determinar las principales tendencias políticas de la interacción de gobierno y empresa, para revelar los procesos de evolución de las relaciones y evaluar las perspectivas de su influencia en el proceso político ucraniano moderno. Los conceptos de acción colectiva y el modelo de universalismo-particularismo se proponen como base metodológica para el análisis de las relaciones entre Estado, empresa y sociedad civil. Se fundamenta que los mecanismos de interacción política entre el Estado y las empresas están siendo reemplazados gradualmente por los mecanismos de influencia política del Estado sobre las empresas. Los resultados obtenidos enfatizan el papel que pueden jugar las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en la representación de la política. En las conclusions se estableció que las formas y principios del corporativismo estatal describen relaciones; cuando el gobierno no sólo elige a: organizaciones y grupos que deberían representar los intereses de la empresa en interacción con ella, pero también los controla hasta cierto punto.
Descargas
Citas
AMSTUTZ, Мark. R. 1995. International Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to World Politics. William C Brown Pub.
ANANIADIS, Blanca P. 2003. Globalization, Welfare and `Social’ Partnership. Global Social Policy. Vol. 03, No. 2, pp. 213–233.
ANDREWS, Rhys. 2012. Social Capital and Public Service Performance: A Review of the Evidence. Public Policy and Administration. Vol. 27, No. 01, pp. 49–67.
ANTONOVA, Olena. 2012. “Legislative regulation of the interaction of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine with non-governmental organizations” In: State and regions: Public administration. Zaporizhzhia. Vol. 04, No. 40, pp. 183-187. Available online. In: http://www.pa.stateandregions.zp.ua/archive/4_2012/34.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 12/03/22.
BAKUROVA,AnnaV.2008.Modelingofprocessesofterritorialself-organization based on soft system methodology: monograph. Zaporizhzhia: Dyke Pole. 187 p.
BERMAN, Sheri. 2021. Revisiting «Civil Society And The Collapse Of The Weimar Republic. HistPhil.
BERNAYS, Edward L. 2014. Crystallizing Public Opinion. Available online. In: http://sttpml.org/wp–content/uploads/2014/06/5369599–Crystallizing-PublicOpinion-Edward-Bernays.pdf. Date of consultation: 12/03/22.
BUTYRSKA, Iryna. 2014. Power and business: a comparative analysis of corruption interaction. Scientific Bulletin [Odesa National Economic University]. No. 6. P. 22-36. Available online. In: http://n-visnik.oneu. edu.ua/files/archive/nv_6_(214)_2014.pdf. Date of consultation: 12/03/22.
CAROTHERS, Thomas; BARNDT, William. 1999. Civil Society. Foreign Policy, 117, 18–29. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.2307/1149558. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
COHEN, Jeffrey. E. 2012. Interest Groups and Presidential Approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 42, No. 03, pp. 431–454.
COLEMAN, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital” In: American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. Available online. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
DIAMOND, Larry. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation” In: Journal of Democracy. Vol. 05, No. 03, pp. 4-17. Available online. In: doi:10.1353/jod.1994.0041. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
DMYTRENKO, Mykola A. 2011. Political system of Ukraine: development in the conditions of globalization and information revolution. Monograph. University «Ukraine» Kyiv, Ukraine.
FUKUYAMA Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy, First edition. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York, USA.
GOSEWINKEL, Dieter. 2011. “Civil Society, in: European History Online (EGO)” In: published by the Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz” Available online. In: http://www.ieg-ego.eu/gosewinkeld-2010-en. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. The MIT Press, Cambridge. Massachusetts, USA.
HANCOCK M. Donald. 2003. Politics in Europe: An Introduction to Politics in the U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Sweden and the EU (3rd Edition). Chatham House Publishers, Incorporated. New York, USA.
HOSHOVSKA, Valentyna; ANTONOVA, Olena. 2013. Conceptual conditions of the organization of the interaction of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine with non-governmental organizations. State and regions: Public administration. Zaporizhzhia. Issue 2, No. 42, pp. 48-52. Available online. In: http://pa.stateandregions.zp.ua/archive/2_2013/10.pdf. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
HRYCHYNA, Natalia A. 2009. Lobbyism as an institution of modern democracy. Dissertation D. in Political Science. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 186 p. Kyiv, Ukraine.
JOTTIER, Dimi; HEYNDELS, Bruno. 2012. Does social capital increase political accountability? An empirical test for Flemish municipalities. Public Choice. Vol. 150, No. 3/4, pp. 731–744. Available online. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41406906. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
KEOHANE, Robert.O; HOFFMANN, Stanley. 1994. Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s.
KNACK, Stephen. 2002. “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States” In: American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 46, No. 04, pp. 772–785. Available online. In: https://doi. org/10.2307/3088433. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
KOROTKOV, Dmytro. 2012. Political elite of Ukraine: Formation and Development in the Electoral Process. monograph: KNEU Publishing House. 212 p. Available online. In: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26039. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
KRICKALUK, Nasary I. 2016. Institutsionalization of a civil society as a part of political democracy in Ukraine. Manuscript. 23.00.02 political institutions and processes. The Kyiv National university of Taras Shevchenko, Ministry of Education of Ukraine, Kyiv.
KUZIO, Taras. 2011. “Political Culture and Democracy: Ukraine as an Immobile State” In: East European Politics and Societies. Vol. 25, No. 01, pp. 88– 113. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325410388410. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
KYIVPOST ON TWITTER. 2023. As a result of Russia’s full-scale #invasion, Ukrainian oligarchs have lost assets and political influence, making them effectively no longer. Available online. In: https://twitter.com/KyivPost/ status/1644236422726004741. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
LEVIN, Yuval. 2008. Imagining the Future: Science and American Democracy. Encounter Books. New York, USA.
LOMBARDO, Emanuela. 2007. “The Participation of Civil Society” In: Constitutional Politics in the European Union. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593343_9. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
LOY, Anatolii. 2016. “Post-Soviet syndrome of the Ukrainian elite. Authorities and Civil Society: Challenges for Ukraine. Round table “Philosophical Thought” In: Philosophical Thought. No. 01. pp. 6-11. Available online. In: http://journal.philosophy.ua/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/5. pdf. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
MALONEY, William; SMITH, Graham; STOKER, Gerry. 2000. “Social Capital and Urban Governance: Adding a More Contextualized ‘Top- down’ Perspective” In: Political Studies. Vol. 48, No. 04, pp. 802–820. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00284. Date of consultation: 22/03/22.
MYKHALCHENKO, Mykola. 2004. Ukraine as a new historical reality: Europe’s spare player. Revival. 488 p. Kyiv, Ukraine.
MYKHALCHENKO, Mykola. 2011. “The political system in Ukraine: what are we modernizing?” In: Viche. No. 01, pp. 27–30. Available online. In: https://veche.kiev.ua/journal/2358/. Date of consultation: 22/06/22.
NEWTON, Kenneth. 2001. “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy” In: International Political Science Review. Vol. 22, No. 02, pp. 201–214. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004. Date of consultation: 22/07/22.
NICOLAS, Griess haber; BENNY, Geys. 2012. “Civic Engagement and Corruption” In: 20 European Democracies, European Societies. Vol. 14, No. 01, pp. 57-81. Available online. In: DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2011.638084. Date of consultation: 22/09/22.
OLSON, Mancur. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, With a New Preface and Appendix. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 198 p. ISBN 9780674537514.
ON THE STATE. 2021. Of development of civil society of Ukraine in 2021 and its changes at the beginning of 2022: mater. every year add. 2022. NISD. 56 p. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2022-11/stan_rozvytku_igs_na_site_22_11_22.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
PAVLENKO, Iryna. 2004. “Ideology of left-wing parties and organizations in Ukraine” In: Political management. No 6. P. 79-87. Available online. In: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/11590. Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
PUGACH, Viktoriia. 2006. The phenomenon of bureaucracy in a transformational society: diss. Ph.D. political science: 23.00.02. 173 p. Kyiv, Ukraine.
PUTNAM, Robert D.; LEONARDI, Robert; NONETTI, Raffaella Y. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press. 446 p.
RASMUSSEN, Anne, REHER, Stefanie; TOSHKOV, Dimiter. 2018. “The opinion policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions” In: European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 58, No. 02, pp. 412–434. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12286. Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
REGINI, Marino. 2003. “Tripartite Concertation and Varieties of Capitalism” In: European Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 09, No. 03, pp. 251– 263. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801030093001. Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
SHAIGORODSKYI, Yury. 2021. Development of civil society and the problem of «deficit of democracy». The political process in independent Ukraine: results and problems. Kyiv: Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies named after I. F. Kuras NAS of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/politychnyi_ protses_u_nezaleznii_ukraini.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
SOCIAL VALUES OF THE POPULATION OF UKRAINE IN THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL DIMENSIONS. 2013. I.F. Kuras Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. 336 p. Available online. In: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/ uploads/2018/07/suspilni_tsinnosti_164.pdf Date of consultation: 14/05/23.
STATE POLICY OF PROMOTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY. 2013. Methodological recommendations. Ukr. independent flight center research: A. O. Krasnosilska, M. V. Latsiba, A. V. Voloshina, V. O. Kuprii, N. M. Chermoshentseva, O. L. Vashchuk. Kyiv: Agency «Ukraine», 180 p.
SYRYTSIA, Taras. 2006. Peculiarities of the relationship between politics and the economy in the conditions of post-socialist transformations: diss. candidate flight. Sciences: 23.00.02. Kyiv, Ukraine. 208 p.
TELESHUN, Yaroslav. 2017. “Clientelism as central component of financial-political groups’ functioning” In: Political life. No. 3, pp.79-83.
TKACH, Oleg; LARINA, Natalia. 2013. “Mutual responsibility of the state and society in social policy as a factor of political development” In: Actual problems of public administration. No. 02. pp. 260-265. Available online. In: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apdy_2013_2_37. Date of consultation: 14/01/23.
TKACH,Oleg.2017.Formationanddevelopmentofvolunteeringasaninstitution of civil society. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Political Science. Issue 1. pp. 34-38. Available online. In: http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/VKNUPOL_2017_1_10.\ Date of consultation: 14/01/23.
TKACH, Oleg; TKACH, Anatoly. 2019. “Volunteer Movement in Ukraine in the Situation of External Aggression” In: Ukrainian Policymaker. Vol. 04, pp. 52-61. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/8. Date of consultation: 14/01/23.
TWO CHEERS for Ukraine’s Oligarchs. 2023. Since the early 1990s, Ukraine’s tycoons have freely deployed their media assets in political battles. Partly as a result, no Ukrainian. Available online. In: https://www.wsj.com/articles/two-cheers-for-ukraines-oligarchs-3d8240a2. Date of consultation: 14/01/23.
WEEDEN, Curt. 1998. Corporate Social Investing. The breakthrough Strategy for Giving and Getting Corporate Contributions. Berrett-Kaehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, USA.
Copyright
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación donde se presenta el artículo, el cual se publica bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite a otros compartir el trabajo previo el reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)