Observance of individual rights in criminal proceedings during martial law
Observancia de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante la ley marcial
Resumen
El objetivo de la investigación fue identificar las amenazas a los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante la ley marcial. La investigación involucró los métodos de sistema, análisis descriptivo, muestreo sistemático, enfoque doctrinal y pronóstico. La ley marcial introducida como resultado de un conflicto armado conlleva importantes implicaciones para la justicia penal. La garantía de la observancia de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante este período se aplica a varios delitos, cuyo rasgo común es el momento de su comisión. Se presenta la clasificación de los sujetos de prevención de la vulneración de tales derechos. Las perspectivas de mejorar la protección de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales requieren asistencia internacional en la detección de crímenes relacionados con el conflicto armado. Se concluye que, asegurar la observancia de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante la ley marcial requiere combinar los esfuerzos de especialistas nacionales e internacionales. Las perspectivas para mejorar este proceso prevén la asistencia internacional con un mayor uso de sus resultados como prueba en los tribunales nacionales e internacionales. Es apropiado desarrollar recomendaciones internacionales para las agencias nacionales encargadas de hacer cumplir la ley y los órganos judiciales.
Descargas
Citas
CARRERA, Sergio; MITSILEGAS, Valsamis; STEFAN, Marco. 2021. Criminal Justice, Fundamental Rights and the Rule of law in the Digital Age: Report of CEPS and QMUL Task Force / Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). Brussels. Available online. In: https://www.ceps.eu/wp- content/uploads/2021/05/Criminal-Justice-Fundamental-Rights-and- the-Rule-of-law-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
CENSS.2019.AGuidetoGatheringEvidencefortheInternationalCriminalCourt and Documenting International Crimes. Kyiv, Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and Internally Displaced Persons of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://censs.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D 0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F-%D0%9C%D0%9A%D0%A1.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
CHRISTAKIS, Theodore; BOUSLIMANI, Katia. 2021. “National Security, Surveillance, and Human Rights.” In: The Oxford Handbook of the International Law of Global Security. Robin Geiβ; Nils Melzer (eds.), pp. 699–C38.P84. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1093/ law/9780198827276.003.0039. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
COUNCIL OF BARS & LAW SOCIETIES OF EUROPE. 2019. CCBE Recommendations оn the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Context of ‘National Security’. Available online. In: https:// www. ccbe. eu/ fileadmin / speciality_distr ibution / public/ documents/SURVEILLANCE/SVLGuidesrecommendations/ ENSVL20190329CCBE-Recommendations-on-the-protection- of-fundamental-rights-in-the-context-of-national-security.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
D’ALESSANDRA, Federica; SUTHERLAND, Kirsty. 2021. “The Promise and Challenges of New Actors and New Technologies in International Justice” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 9-34.
DAVID, Eric. 2011. Principles of the law of armed conflicts. ICRC. Brussels, Belgium.
DUPONT,Benoît;STEVENS,Yuan;WESTERMANN,Hannes;JOYCE,Michael. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Crime and Criminal Justice. A Report for the Korean Institute of Criminology. Korean Institute of Criminology, Canada Research Chair in Cybersecurity. Available online. In: https://www.cicc-iccc.org/public/media/files/prod/publication_ files/Artificial-Intelligence-in-the-Context-of-Crime-and-Criminal- Justice_KICICCC_2019.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
ESKAURIATZA, Javier. 2021. “Complete Labelling” and Domestic Prosecutions for Crimes Against Humanity” In: Criminal Law Forum. Vol. 32, pp. 473- 509.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1978. Case оf Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978 / The European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22item id%22:[%22001-57510%22]}. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1987. Case оf Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng?i=001-57519. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2010. Case оf Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, 18 August 2010. Available online. In: https://data. guardint.org/en/entity/ba35eci78cc. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
FREEMAN, Lindsay. 2018. “Digital Evidence and War Crimes Prosecutions: The Impact of Digital Technologies on International Criminal Investigations and Trials” In: Fordham International Law Journal. Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 283-335.
GVOZDIY, Valentyn. 2022. The rule of law in Ukraine during martial law: Review of changes to the criminal process. Available online. In: https:// www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the- rule-of-law-in-ukraine-during-martial-law-review-of-changes-to-the- criminal-process. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
JEßBERGER, Florian; STEINL, Leonie. 2022. “Strategic Litigation in International Criminal Justice Facilitating a View from Within” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 379-401.
LISITSYNA, Yuliya; GURTIEVA, Lyudmila; PAVLYSHYN, Andriy; LUKASHCHUK, Karina; NURIYEV, Elnur. 2022. “Corruption Crimes and Peculiarities of their Investigation Procedure under Martial Law” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 11, No. 54, pp. 41-49.
LOHNE, Kjersti. 2020. “Penal welfarism ‘gone global’? Comparing international criminal justice to the Culture of Control” In: Punishment and Society. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 3-23.
MAYANS-HERMIDA, Beatriz; HOLA, Barbora. 2020. “Balancing ‘the International’ and ‘the Domestic’ Sanctions under the ICC Principle of Complementarity” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 18, pp. 1103-1130.
McBRIDE, Jeremy. 2009. Human rights and criminal procedure: The case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/16806f0ef9. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
MYJER, Egbert; HANCOCK, Barry; COWDERY, Nicolas. 2009. Human Rights Manual for Prosecutors. International Association of Prosecutors. Available online. In: https://www.iap-association.org/getattachment/ Resources-Documentation/IAP-Human-Rights-Manual/Human_Rights_Manual_IAP.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
MYKHAILENKO, Vira. 2022. Judicial practice on preventive measures under martial law. LexInform. Available online. In: https://lexinform.com.ua/ yuridychna-praktyka/sudova-praktyka-z-pytan-zapobizhnyh-zahodiv- v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu/. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. 2003. Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers. New York and Geneva.
P.H.P.H.M.C. VAN KEMPEN. 2014. Criminal Law and Human Rights. Radboud University Nifmegen. Nifmegen. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
SCHMITT, Stefan. 2022. “Proving war crimes isn’t simple – a forensics expert explains what’s involved with documenting human rights violations during conflicts, from Afghanistan to Ukraine” In: The Conversation, 5 August 2022. Available online. In: http://surl.li/djeia. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
SCHWARZ, Alexander. 2018. “War Crimes.” In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.
TEFERRA, Zelalem Mogessie. 2016. “National security and the right to liberty in armed conflict: The legality and limits of security detention in international humanitarian law” In: International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 961-993.
UNITED NATIONS. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. General Assembly Resolution 2200A(XXI). Available online. In: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/ international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
UNITED NATIONS. 2011. International Legal Protection оf Human Rights іn Armed Conflict. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. New York and Geneva. Available online. In: https://www.ohchr.org/ sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/HR_in_armed_conflict. pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
UNITED NATIONS. 2022. The scale of extrajudicial killings in areas north of Kyiv is shocking. Available online. In: https://news.un.org/ru/ story/2022/05/1423702. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
Copyright
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación donde se presenta el artículo, el cual se publica bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite a otros compartir el trabajo previo el reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)