Normative regulation of witness immunity in international law

Regulación normativa de la inmunidad de testigos en la legislación internacional

Palabras clave: proceso penal, testigo, inmunidad de testigos, testimonio, garantías

Resumen

Mediante la dialéctica materialista el artículo está dedicado al estudio y solución de cuestiones teóricas y prácticas relacionadas con el derecho de una persona a no declarar ni dar explicaciones sobre sí misma, sus familiares o parientes cercanos. Interesó aquí la revisión minuciosa de las fuentes doctrinales de este derecho, el significado y metodología de su investigación, el concepto y contenido del derecho de una persona a no testificar, las peculiaridades de este derecho en Ucrania y en el mundo, su legislación, así como su garantía de implementación. Además, con base en el análisis de la legislación de cada país, los autores identifican las características de la garantía, analizan los aspectos teóricos y los problemas prácticos de otorgar a las autoridades policiales y judiciales el derecho a no declarar o dar explicaciones sobre sí mismos.Se concluye que, la inmunidad de los testigos significa un conjunto de normas que exime a ciertos grupos de testigos de la obligación de declarar en los procesos penales, así como de la obligación del testigo de declarar contra sí mismo. En este sentido, la inmunidad para un testigo se divide en dos tipos de imperativos: (absoluto, incondicional) y dispositivo (relativo, condicional).

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Yevhen Priakhin, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology of the Faculty No 1 of the Institute for Training Specialists for the National Police of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Andrii Lytvyn, National Police of the Volyn Region, Volyn Region, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, Head of the Kovel Regional Police Department of the Main Directorate of the National Police of the Volyn Region; Kovel, Volyn Region, Ukraine.

Nataliia Kononenko, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, senior lecturer at the Department of Criminology and Forensic Medicine, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Yevdokiia Buzhdyhanchuk, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of legal sciences, senior lecturer at the Department of Criminal Procedure, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Irina Dubivka, National Police of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Candidate of Science in law, Senior investigator in especially important cases of the 1st department of the pre-trial investigation department of the National Police of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Citas

APAROVA, Tatiana. 1996. Courts and litigation. England, Wales, Scotland. M. Institute of International law and economics. Triada, LTD. London, England.

BELKOVA, Olga. 2004. “Theoretical and practical aspects of the right of a witness to refuse to testify about himself, family members and close relatives” In: Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law No. 2, pp. 102104.

BEREZHANSKAYA, Victoria. 2019. The constitutional right of a person not to give testimony or explanations about himself, family members or close relatives and his provision in Ukraine. Dissertation of the doctor of legal sciences. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.

BRYSON, William. 1992. UK the American Judicial System. In: Rule of law: a collection, translated from English. Progress. Moscow, Russia.

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS. No. 295-З. 1999. Available online. In: https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=hk9900295. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 2014. Available online. In: http://www.online.zakon.kz/ Document/?doc_id=1008442#sub_id=590000. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA. 1992. Available online. In: https://www.lrs.lt/home/Konstitucija/Konstitucija_RU.htm. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CONSTITUTIONS OF FOREIGN STATES: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. GERMANY. ITALY. JAPAN. CANADA. 1997. Allowance MAKLAKOV, Viacheslav. 2nd ed. BEC. Moscow, Russia.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF GEORGIA. 2017. Available online. In: https://www.matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/90034/37/ ru/pdf. Consultation date: 22/06/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA. 1998. No. ЗР-248. Available online. In: http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc. fwx?rgn=7460. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2012. No. 4651–VI. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. Consultation date: 22/04/2021.

FILIMONOV, Boris. 1994. Foundations of the theory of evidence in German criminal procedure. Moscow. Russia.

GALAGAN, Oleksandr; SAVCHENKO, Volodymyr. 2011. Protection of the rights and freedoms of criminal justice in Ukraine and Germany. IvanoFrankivsk: Misto – NV. Ukraine.

GUTSENKO, Konstantin; GOLOVKO, Leonid; FILIMONOV, Boris. 2002. Criminal proceedings of Western states. Zertsalo-M. Moscow, Russia.

ISRAEL, Jerold; KAMISAR, Yale; LAFAVE, Waync; KING, Nancy. 2018. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution, Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text. (American Casebook Series). Minnesota, United States of America.

KALINOVSKY, Konstantin. 2000. Criminal proceedings of modern foreign states. Petrus Publishing House. Petrozavodsk, Russia.

KHARITONOVA, Marina. 2019. “Witness immunity as an element of the principle of protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in criminal proceedings” In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings. No. 3, pp. 239-248.

LOSKUTOVA, Tatianna. 2005. Witness and his testimony in the criminal proceedings of England and the United States: Dissertation of the doctor of legal sciences. Moscow. Russia.

MAKHOV, Vadim; PESHKOV, Maksim. 1998. US Criminal Procedure (pre– trial stages). Intel–Synthesis Business School. Russia, Moscow.

MISES, Ludwig. 1997. Liberalism in Classical Tradition. Boston, USA.

RULE 6003. INTERIM AND FINAL RELIEF IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE CASE. In: https://www.law.cornell. edu/rules/frbp/rule_6003. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.

UDALOVA, Larisa. 2004. “Immunity in criminal proceedings” In: Law of Ukraine. No. 4, p. 75.

VOLKOTRUB, Serhii. 2005. Immunity in the criminal process of Ukraine: monograph Kharkiv. Consum. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

VOLOSOVA, Nonna. 2011. Provisions of witness immunity in criminal proceedings in Russia and foreign countries: monograph. IP Osinochkin Ya.V. Orenburg, Russia.

VOLOSOVA, Nonna; FEDOROVA, Olga. 2008. US criminal procedure law: state law, general characteristics, comparative analysis: monograph. Yurlitinform. Moscow, Russia.

СONSTITUTIONS OF THE EU. Available online. In: https://www.mid. ru/evropejskij-souz-es/-/asset_publisher/6OiYovt2s4Yc/content/ id/440540. Consultation date: 22/09/2021.
Publicado
2022-02-19
Cómo citar
Priakhin, Y., Lytvyn, A., Kononenko, N., Buzhdyhanchuk, Y., & Dubivka, I. (2022). Normative regulation of witness immunity in international law: Regulación normativa de la inmunidad de testigos en la legislación internacional. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(72), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.11
Sección
Derecho Público