Energía digestible y digestibilidad de nutrientes de la harina de soya entera en cuyes adultos y en crecimiento
Palabras clave:
Cavia porcellus, Glycine max, digestibilidad, energía, valor nutricional
Resumen
El uso de harina de soya entera (FSBM) en la alimentación de cuyes sería una buena alternativa para mejorar la proteína dietaria, pero se sabe poco sobre el uso de sus nutrientes en esta especie animal. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar la digestibilidad de los nutrientes y la energía digerible de la FSBM y los efectos de su incorporación en las dietas de los cuyes. Se utilizaron treinta cuyes machos, de dos y 10 semanas de edad (15 animales/edad). Se utilizó una dieta basal, a partir de la cual se realizó la sustitución peso/peso en proporciones de 15 y 30 % de inclusión de FSBM. La digestibilidad de los nutrientes de las dietas fue diferente entre edades, siendo mayor en adultos que en crecimiento (p<0.001). La digestibilidad de la MS y los nutrientes de la FSBM fue alta, siendo mayor en cuyes adultos (76,94 % MS, 77,56 % MO, 82,34 % PB, 86,87 % EE y 60,96 % CF) que en crecimiento (71,78 % MS, 72,35 % MO, 66,24 % CP, 60,37 % EE y 50,41 % CF) (p<0,001). La energía digestible fue 3375 y 3093 kcal.kg-1 MS para cuyes adultos y en crecimiento respectivamente (p<0,001). La harina de FSBM es una buena opción para la alimentación de cuyes adultos y en crecimiento debido a su alto valor nutricional y digestibilidad.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Arjona-Smith, M., Chino, V. L. B., Moscoso-Muñoz, J. E. (2022). Evaluación del contenido de aminoácidos de la harina de soya para alimentación avícola y porcina, de acuerdo con el país de origen. Revista Investigaciones Agropecuarias 4(2), 109–120.https://revistas.up.ac.pa/index.php/investigaciones_agropecuarias/article/view/2932
Baker, K. M., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H. (2014). Nutritional value of soybean meal produced from high protein, low oligosaccharide, or conventional varieties of soybeans and fed to weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 188, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.018
Castro-Bedriñana, J., & Chirinos-Peinado, D. (2021). Nutritional value of some raw materials for Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) feeding. Translational Animal Science, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab019
Cheeke Farías-kovac, C., Nicodemus, N., Delgado, R., Ocasio-vega, C., Noboa, T., Abdelrasoul, R. A. S., Carabaño, R., & García, J. (2020). Effect of dietary insoluble and soluble fibre on growth performance, digestibility, and nitrogen, energy, and mineral retention efficiency in growing rabbits. Animals, 10(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081346
Chiou, P. W. S., Yu, B., & Kuo, C. Y. (2000). Comparison of digestive function among rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, and hamsters. I. Performance, digestibility, and rate of digesta passage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(11), 1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1499
Classen, H. L. (2017). Diet energy and feed intake in chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 233, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.03.004
Colombino, E., Karimi, M., Nu, M. A. T., Tilatti, A. A., Sara Bellezza Oddon, Calini, F., Bergamino, C., Fiorilla, E., Gariglio, M., Gai, F., Capucchio, M. T. Schiavone, A., Gasco, L., Biasato, I. (2023). Effects of feeding a thermomechanical, enzyme-facilitated, coprocessed yeast and soybean meal on growth performance, organ weights, leg health, and gut development of broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 102(5) 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102578.
Crowley, E. J., King, J. M., Wilkinson, T., Worgan, H.J., Huson, K.M., Rose, M. T., McEwan, N. R. (2017). Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0165779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165779
Degola, L., Sterna, V., Jansons, I., & Zute, S. (2019). The nutrition value of soybeans grown in Latvia for pig feeding. Agronomy Research, 17(5), 1874–1880. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.158
Díaz Céspedes, M., Rojas Paredes, M. A., Hernández Guevara, J. E., Linares Rivera, J. L., Durand Chávez, L. M., & Moscoso-Muñoz, J. E. M. (2021). Digestibilidad, energía digestible y metabolizable del sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) peletizado y extruido en cuyes (Cavia porcellus). Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 32(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i5.19654
Ebino, K. Y. (1993). Studies on coprophagy in experimental animals. Jikken Dobutsu. Experimental Animals, 42(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim1978.42.1_1
Franz, R., Kreuzer, M., Hummel, J., Hatt, J.-M., & Clauss, M. (2011). Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95: 564 – 570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x
Grant, K. M. S. (2014). Rodent Nutrition: Digestive Comparisons of 4 Common Rodent Species. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, 17(3), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2014.05.007
Henry, Y. (1985). Dietary factors involved in feed intake regulation in growing pigs: A review, Livestock Production Science. 12(4), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90133-2
Ibáñez, M. A., de Blas, C., Cámara, L., and Mateos, G. G. (2020). Chemical composition, protein quality and nutritive value of commercial soybean meals produced from beans from different countries: A meta-analytical study. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 267, 114531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114531
Imam, J., Hambolu, J. O., Onyeanusi, B. I., Ayo, J. O. and Sulaiman, M. H. (2021). Morphological and Morphometric Studies of the Gastro-intestinal Tract of the Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus – Linnaeus, 1758). Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/jva.2021.163576
Janocha, A., Milczarek, A., Pietrusiak, D., Łaski, K., and Saleh, M. (2022). Efficiency of Soybean Products in Broiler Chicken Nutrition. Animals, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030294
Karasov, W. H., & Douglas, A. E. (2013). Comparative digestive physiology. Comprehensive Physiology, 3(2), 741 – 783. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110054
Keeble E. (2023). Guinea pig nutrition: what do we know?. In Practice. 45(4), 185-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/inpr.309
Lagos, L. V., & Stein, H. H. (2017). Chemical composition and amino acid digestibility of soybean meal produced in the United States, China, Argentina, Brazil, or India. Journal of Animal Science, 95(4), 1626. https://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1440
Patiño, B. R. E., Cardona-Igle¬sias, J. L., Carlosama-Ojeda, L. D., Portillo-Lopez, P. A., Moreno, D. C. (2019). Parámetros zootécnicos de Cavia porcellus en sistemas productivos de Nariño y Putumayo (Colombia). CES Medicina Veterinaria Y Zootecnia, 14(3): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.14.3.3
Patiño, B. R. E., Moreno, V. D. C., Carlosama, O. L. D., Portillo, L. P. A., & Cardona-Iglesias, J. L. (2021). Nutritional management of Cavia porcellus L. in the Andes of Colombia. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, 23(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2021.190
Riaz, M. Q., Südekum, K. H., Clauss, M., Jayanegara, A. (2014). Voluntary feed intake and digestibility of four domestic ruminant species as influenced by dietary constituents: a meta-analysis, Livestock Science, 162, 76-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.009
Sciellour, M. L, Labussi, E., Zemb, O., & Id, D. R. (2018). Effect of dietary fiber content on nutrient digestibility and fecal microbiota composition in growing-finishing pigs. PLoS ONE 13(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206159
Shen, J. S., Song, L. J., Sun, H. Z., Wang, B., Chai, Z., Chacher, B., and Liu, J. X. (2015). Effects of corn and soybean meal types on rumen fermentation, nitrogen metabolism and productivity in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0504
Shen, M. M., Bhuiyan, M. M., & Iji, P. A. (2016). Enhancing the nutritional value of soybeans for poultry through supplementation with new-generation feed enzymes. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 72(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916000271
Slade, L. M., & Hintz, H. F. (1969). Comparison of digestion in horses, ponies, rabbits, and guinea pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 28, 842-843. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1969.286842x
Stefanello, C., Vieira, S. L., Rios, H. V., Simões, C. T., and Sorbara, J. O. B. (2016). Energy and nutrient utilization of broilers fed soybean meal from two different Brazilian production areas with an exogenous protease. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 221, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.005
Valentine, M. F., De Tar, J.R., Mookkan, M., Firman, J. D., & Zhang, Z. J. (2017). Silencing of Soybean Raffinose Synthase Gene Reduced Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides and Increased True Metabolizable Energy of Poultry Feed. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 692. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00692
Wang, P., Huang, J., Sun, J., Liu, R., Jiang, T., Sun, G. (2022). Evaluating the Nutritional Properties of Food: A Scoping Review. Nutrients, 14(11), 2352. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14112352.
Wauffo, D. F., Tendonkeng, F., Miégoué, E., Djoumessi Tobou, F. G., Sawa, C., Mouchili, M., & Azangue Jiope, G. (2020). Ingestion and In Vivo Digestibility of a Concentrated Granulated Feed Containing Seeds of Moringa oleifera Associated with Pennisetum purpureum in Guinea Pigs. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10(04), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.104051
Wen-Shyg, Ch. P., Yu, B., & Kuo, Ch-Y. (2000). Comparison of digestive function among rabbits, guinea pigs, rats hamsters. I. Performance, digestibility, and rate of digesta passage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(11): 1499 – 1507. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1499
Wu G. (2022). Nutrition and metabolism: foundations for animal growth, development, reproduction, and health. In: Wu, G. (eds), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition and Metabolism. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1354,1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85686-1_1
Zhang, H. Y., Yi, J. Q., Piao, X. S., Li, P. F., Zeng, Z. K., Wang, D., Liu, L., Wang, G. Q., and Han, X. (2013). The metabolizable energy value, standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal, soy protein concentrate, and fermented soybean meal, and the application of these products in early-weaned piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12429
Baker, K. M., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H. (2014). Nutritional value of soybean meal produced from high protein, low oligosaccharide, or conventional varieties of soybeans and fed to weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 188, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.018
Castro-Bedriñana, J., & Chirinos-Peinado, D. (2021). Nutritional value of some raw materials for Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) feeding. Translational Animal Science, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab019
Cheeke Farías-kovac, C., Nicodemus, N., Delgado, R., Ocasio-vega, C., Noboa, T., Abdelrasoul, R. A. S., Carabaño, R., & García, J. (2020). Effect of dietary insoluble and soluble fibre on growth performance, digestibility, and nitrogen, energy, and mineral retention efficiency in growing rabbits. Animals, 10(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081346
Chiou, P. W. S., Yu, B., & Kuo, C. Y. (2000). Comparison of digestive function among rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, and hamsters. I. Performance, digestibility, and rate of digesta passage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(11), 1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1499
Classen, H. L. (2017). Diet energy and feed intake in chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 233, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.03.004
Colombino, E., Karimi, M., Nu, M. A. T., Tilatti, A. A., Sara Bellezza Oddon, Calini, F., Bergamino, C., Fiorilla, E., Gariglio, M., Gai, F., Capucchio, M. T. Schiavone, A., Gasco, L., Biasato, I. (2023). Effects of feeding a thermomechanical, enzyme-facilitated, coprocessed yeast and soybean meal on growth performance, organ weights, leg health, and gut development of broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 102(5) 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102578.
Crowley, E. J., King, J. M., Wilkinson, T., Worgan, H.J., Huson, K.M., Rose, M. T., McEwan, N. R. (2017). Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0165779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165779
Degola, L., Sterna, V., Jansons, I., & Zute, S. (2019). The nutrition value of soybeans grown in Latvia for pig feeding. Agronomy Research, 17(5), 1874–1880. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.158
Díaz Céspedes, M., Rojas Paredes, M. A., Hernández Guevara, J. E., Linares Rivera, J. L., Durand Chávez, L. M., & Moscoso-Muñoz, J. E. M. (2021). Digestibilidad, energía digestible y metabolizable del sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) peletizado y extruido en cuyes (Cavia porcellus). Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 32(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i5.19654
Ebino, K. Y. (1993). Studies on coprophagy in experimental animals. Jikken Dobutsu. Experimental Animals, 42(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim1978.42.1_1
Franz, R., Kreuzer, M., Hummel, J., Hatt, J.-M., & Clauss, M. (2011). Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95: 564 – 570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x
Grant, K. M. S. (2014). Rodent Nutrition: Digestive Comparisons of 4 Common Rodent Species. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, 17(3), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2014.05.007
Henry, Y. (1985). Dietary factors involved in feed intake regulation in growing pigs: A review, Livestock Production Science. 12(4), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90133-2
Ibáñez, M. A., de Blas, C., Cámara, L., and Mateos, G. G. (2020). Chemical composition, protein quality and nutritive value of commercial soybean meals produced from beans from different countries: A meta-analytical study. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 267, 114531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114531
Imam, J., Hambolu, J. O., Onyeanusi, B. I., Ayo, J. O. and Sulaiman, M. H. (2021). Morphological and Morphometric Studies of the Gastro-intestinal Tract of the Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus – Linnaeus, 1758). Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/jva.2021.163576
Janocha, A., Milczarek, A., Pietrusiak, D., Łaski, K., and Saleh, M. (2022). Efficiency of Soybean Products in Broiler Chicken Nutrition. Animals, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030294
Karasov, W. H., & Douglas, A. E. (2013). Comparative digestive physiology. Comprehensive Physiology, 3(2), 741 – 783. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110054
Keeble E. (2023). Guinea pig nutrition: what do we know?. In Practice. 45(4), 185-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/inpr.309
Lagos, L. V., & Stein, H. H. (2017). Chemical composition and amino acid digestibility of soybean meal produced in the United States, China, Argentina, Brazil, or India. Journal of Animal Science, 95(4), 1626. https://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1440
Patiño, B. R. E., Cardona-Igle¬sias, J. L., Carlosama-Ojeda, L. D., Portillo-Lopez, P. A., Moreno, D. C. (2019). Parámetros zootécnicos de Cavia porcellus en sistemas productivos de Nariño y Putumayo (Colombia). CES Medicina Veterinaria Y Zootecnia, 14(3): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.14.3.3
Patiño, B. R. E., Moreno, V. D. C., Carlosama, O. L. D., Portillo, L. P. A., & Cardona-Iglesias, J. L. (2021). Nutritional management of Cavia porcellus L. in the Andes of Colombia. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, 23(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2021.190
Riaz, M. Q., Südekum, K. H., Clauss, M., Jayanegara, A. (2014). Voluntary feed intake and digestibility of four domestic ruminant species as influenced by dietary constituents: a meta-analysis, Livestock Science, 162, 76-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.009
Sciellour, M. L, Labussi, E., Zemb, O., & Id, D. R. (2018). Effect of dietary fiber content on nutrient digestibility and fecal microbiota composition in growing-finishing pigs. PLoS ONE 13(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206159
Shen, J. S., Song, L. J., Sun, H. Z., Wang, B., Chai, Z., Chacher, B., and Liu, J. X. (2015). Effects of corn and soybean meal types on rumen fermentation, nitrogen metabolism and productivity in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0504
Shen, M. M., Bhuiyan, M. M., & Iji, P. A. (2016). Enhancing the nutritional value of soybeans for poultry through supplementation with new-generation feed enzymes. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 72(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916000271
Slade, L. M., & Hintz, H. F. (1969). Comparison of digestion in horses, ponies, rabbits, and guinea pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 28, 842-843. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1969.286842x
Stefanello, C., Vieira, S. L., Rios, H. V., Simões, C. T., and Sorbara, J. O. B. (2016). Energy and nutrient utilization of broilers fed soybean meal from two different Brazilian production areas with an exogenous protease. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 221, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.005
Valentine, M. F., De Tar, J.R., Mookkan, M., Firman, J. D., & Zhang, Z. J. (2017). Silencing of Soybean Raffinose Synthase Gene Reduced Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides and Increased True Metabolizable Energy of Poultry Feed. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 692. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00692
Wang, P., Huang, J., Sun, J., Liu, R., Jiang, T., Sun, G. (2022). Evaluating the Nutritional Properties of Food: A Scoping Review. Nutrients, 14(11), 2352. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14112352.
Wauffo, D. F., Tendonkeng, F., Miégoué, E., Djoumessi Tobou, F. G., Sawa, C., Mouchili, M., & Azangue Jiope, G. (2020). Ingestion and In Vivo Digestibility of a Concentrated Granulated Feed Containing Seeds of Moringa oleifera Associated with Pennisetum purpureum in Guinea Pigs. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10(04), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.104051
Wen-Shyg, Ch. P., Yu, B., & Kuo, Ch-Y. (2000). Comparison of digestive function among rabbits, guinea pigs, rats hamsters. I. Performance, digestibility, and rate of digesta passage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(11): 1499 – 1507. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1499
Wu G. (2022). Nutrition and metabolism: foundations for animal growth, development, reproduction, and health. In: Wu, G. (eds), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition and Metabolism. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1354,1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85686-1_1
Zhang, H. Y., Yi, J. Q., Piao, X. S., Li, P. F., Zeng, Z. K., Wang, D., Liu, L., Wang, G. Q., and Han, X. (2013). The metabolizable energy value, standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal, soy protein concentrate, and fermented soybean meal, and the application of these products in early-weaned piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12429
Publicado
2024-09-26
Cómo citar
Chillpa-Sencia, C., Moscoso, J., Chino-Velasquez, L., Molina-Botero, I., Gómez, O., & Arjona-Smith, M. (2024). Energía digestible y digestibilidad de nutrientes de la harina de soya entera en cuyes adultos y en crecimiento. Revista De La Facultad De Agronomía De La Universidad Del Zulia, 41(4), e244135. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/agronomia/article/view/42777
Número
Sección
Producción Animal
Derechos de autor 2024 Celia Chillpa-Sencia, Juan Elmer Moscoso Muñoz, Liz Beatriz Chino-Velasquez, Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero, Oscar Elisban Gómez Quispe, Mario Arjona-Smith
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
