Duit Turus: A solution to conflicts in Dayak traditional marriages

• S. SADIANI Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Abstract

ABSTRACT

 

This study explored the position of Duit Turus in the Dayak tribe marriage and the philosophy contained in the symbol of the Duit Turus. Participants included the families of the groom, the bride, and people who have received Duit Turus. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation studies and analyzed from sociology and anthropology studies of Islamic law. The results showed that giving Duit Turus to the guests or witnesses in the Dayak wedding procession must be carried after an agreement between the two families of the bride and groom.

RESUMEN

 

Este estudio exploró la posición del Duit Turus en el matrimonio de la tribu Dayak y la filosofía contenida en el símbolo del Duit Turus. Los participantes incluyeron a las familias del novio, la novia y las personas que han recibido Duit Turus. Los datos fueron recolectados mediante observación, entrevistas y estudios de documentación y se analizaron desde el punto de vista de los estudios de sociología y antropología del derecho islámico. Los resultados mostraron que dar Duit Turus a los invitados o testigos en la procesión de bodas Dayak debe llevarse a cabo después de un acuerdo entre las dos familias de los novios.

References

ADHIKARI, R (2018). “Child marriage and physical violence: Results from a nationally representative study in Nepal”. Journal of Health Promotion, 6, pp. 49-59.

AHMAD, I., & AHMAD, S. (2018). “Multiple Skills and Medium Enterprises’ Performance in Punjab Pakistan: A Pilot Study”. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 7(2010), 44-49.

AHMAD, I., & AHMAD, S. (2019). “The Mediation Effect of Strategic Planning on The Relationship Between Business Skills and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Medium Enterprises in Punjab, Pakistan”. Opcion, 35(24), 746-778.

AHMAD, I., SAHAR. (2019). “Waste Management Analysis from Economic Environment Sustainability Perspective”. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 8(12), 1540-1543.

ARFA, FA, & MARPAUNG, W (2016). “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam”. Kencana.

BAKRY, N (2013). “Problematika pelaksaan fikih Islam”. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

BUCKLEY, E (2006). “A Cross-Cultural Study of Weddings through Media and Ritual: Analyzing Indian and North American Weddings”. McNair Scholars Journal, 10(1), p. 3.

CARTER, J (2017). “Why marry? The role of tradition in women’s marital aspirations”. Sociological Research Online, 22(1), pp. 1–14.

DIEN, Y (2020). “Optimizing Performance through Organizational Culture and Work Spirituality: Empirical Study of Lecturer Performance in Private Institutions of Higher Education in Indonesia”. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1).

GELGEL, IP, & UTAMA, IWB (2018). “Basir in the religious system of Dayak Hindu Kaharingan society”. International journal of social sciences and humanities, 2(2), pp. 164-174.

GIN, OK (2015). “Brunei-History, Islam, Society, and Contemporary Issues”. Routledge.

GORLINSKI, G (2019). “Dayak”. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dayak

HARRAWAY, D (2015). “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin”. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.

JANSEN, D. (2010). “Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peace Building”. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 32(3), pp. 491-493.

KOENTJARANINGRAT (1990). “Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Penerbit Rineka Cipta”.

MINOS, P (2000). “The future of Dayak Bidayuhs in Malaysia”. Kuching: Lynch Media & Services.

NYALUNG, YI, & SHOLAHUDDIN, A (2015). “Ticak Kacang Tradition of Dayak Siang, Central Kalimantan (Ethnomethodology Study on Ticak Kacang Marriage, Tanah Siang District Murung Raya Regency)”. International Journal of Applied Sociology, 5(3), pp. 152-157.

PERDANA, I, & EMZIR, E (2016). “Speech Acts in Wedding Ceremony Wurung Jue of Dayak Ma’ anyan”. Ijlecr-international journal of language education and culture review, 2(2), pp. 33-40.

SHARMA, I, TRIPATHI, CB, & PATHAK, A (2015). “Social and legal aspects of marriage in women with mental illness in India”. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(2), pp. 324–332.

SILVERMAN, D (2011). “Interpreting qualitative data”. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

SOEKANTO, S (2002). “Sosiologi hokum”. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

SURIANSYAH, A, ASLAMIAH, A, NOORHAPIZAH, N, WINARDI, I, & DALLE, J (2019). “The Relationship between University Autonomy, Lecturer Empowerment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Indonesian Universities”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 127-152.

USMAN, M (2002). “Kaidah-kaidah ushuliyah dan fiqhiyah”. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

VEEN, S, MOORTEN R & DURANI, W (2018). “Marriage decision-making: A family affair–Insight into marriage decision-making processes and social norms around child marriage in Larkana and Shikarpur”. Kuching: Lynch Media & Services.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R (2018). “El derecho a la autobiografía: dimensión ius-filosófica desde la perspectiva de H. Arendt y P. Ricoeur”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 34(18), pp. 1012-1587.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J; RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R & DÍAZ-CID, L (2019). “Bioética y biopoder: Perspectivas para una praxis pedagógica desde la ética de Álvaro Márquez-Fernández”. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, Revista Internacional de Filosofía y Teoría Social, 24(87), pp. 65-77.