The Shortage of Peer Reviewers: A Challenge for Quality and Scientific Ethics

• Oskarly Pérez-Anaya University of Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-7847
• Midian Clara Castillo-Pedraza University of Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-3959
• Jorge Homero Wilches-Visbal University of Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3649-5079

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14599207

Keywords: Text review, Scientific journal, Document evaluation, Quality of education

Abstract

Peer review is essential in scientific publishing, ensuring the quality and originality of the work. However, there is a growing shortage of reviewers due to the increase in publications, the pressure to publish, and the lack of recognition. This causes delays in reviews, affecting the quality of research. The objective of this work is to briefly discuss and propose sustainable solutions to ensure the viability and quality of the peer review system and, consequently, of scientific research.

References

Arencibia Jorge, R., & Moya Anegón, F. (2008). La evaluación de la investigación científica : una aproximación teórica desde la cienciometría. Revista Cubana de Informacion en Ciencias de la Salud, 17(4), 1–27. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aci/v17n4/aci04408.pdf

Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784

Sarthou, N. F. (2016). Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 58, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.7440/res58.2016.06

Sebola, M. P. (2018). Peer review, scholarship and editors of scientific publications: the death of scientific knowledge in Africa. Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 83(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2314

Smith R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99 (4), 178–182. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/