Soluciones numéricas para diferentes casos del modelo biológico no lineal de presa- depredador
Abstract
La presente investigación se elaboró con el objetivo realizar una comparación de la solución numérica del modelo biológico no lineal de presa depredador, utilizando el método numérico Adams predicción-corrección junto con los métodos explícitos de Runge-Kutta. Los resultados numéricos para los métodos en mención comparan todos los casos de modelo de presa- depredador, encontrándose que los resultados se superponen entre si hasta un nivel de precisión de 7 a 8, cuando el intervalo se toma de [1,30] con el tamaño de paso de 1.
Downloads
References
Ash, J. H. (1965). An Adams Runge-Kutta subroutine for systems of ordinary differential equations. Toronto. University of Toronto.
Batiha, B. (2014). The solution of the prey and predator problem by differential transformation method. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(1), pp.36-43.
Bashkirtseva, I. and Ryashko, L. (2014). Analysis of the noise-induced regimes in Ricker population model with Allee effect via confidence domains technique. BioMed research international, 2014.
Biazar, J. and Montazeri, R. (2005). A computational method for solution of the prey and predator problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 163(2), pp.841-847.
Bildik, N. and Deniz, S. (2016). The Use of Sumudu Decomposition Method for Solving Predator-Prey Systems. Mathematical Sciences Letters, 5(3), pp.285-289.
Danca, M., Codreanu, S., Bako, B. (1997). Detailed analysis of a nonlinear prey-predator model, J. Biol. Phys. 23 (1997) 11–20.
Effati, S., Mansoori, A. and Eshaghnezhad, M. (2015). An efficient projection neural network for solving bilinear programming problems. Neurocomputing, 168, pp.1188-1197
Elsadany, A. E. A., El-Metwally, H. A., Elabbasy, E. M. and Agiza, H. N. (2012). Chaos and bifurcation of a nonlinear discrete prey-predator system. Computational Ecology and Software, 2(3), p.169.
Garvie, M.R., Burkardt, J. and Morgan, J. (2015). Simple Finite Element Methods for Approximating Predator–Prey Dynamics in Two Dimensions Using Matlab. Bulletin of mathematical biology, 77(3), pp.548-578.
Holling, C. S. (1966). The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 98(S48), pp.5-86.
Jing, Z. and Yang, J. (2006). Bifurcation and chaos in discrete-time predator–prey system. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 27(1), pp.259-277.
Liu, X. and Xiao, D. (2007). Complex dynamic behaviors of a discrete-time predator–prey system. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 32(1), pp.80-94.
Moulton, Forest R. (1926). New methods in exterior ballistics, University of Chicago Press.
Paul, S., Mondal, S.P. and Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Numerical solution of Lotka Volterra prey predator model by using Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg method and Laplace Adomian decomposition method. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), pp.613-617.
Ray, S.S. (2015). A New Coupled Fractional Reduced Differential Transform Method for the Numerical Solution of Fractional Predator-Prey System. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 105(3), pp.231-249.
Solis, F. J. (2008). Self-limitation in a discrete predator–prey model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 48(1), pp.191-196
Summers, D., Cranford, J. G. and Healey, B.P. (2000). Chaos in periodically forced discrete-time ecosystem models. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 11(14), pp.2331-2342.
Yu, J. and Yu, J. (2014). Homotopy Analysis Method for a Prey-Predator System with Holling IV Functional Response. Applied Mechanics & Materials.
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
