Teaching potential of integrated learning technologies Smart, Stem and Steam

  • Vladimir Nikolaevich Aniskin Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
  • Aleksandr A. Korostelev Togliatti State University
  • Busygina Alla Lvovna Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
  • Anatoly V. Kurochkin Kazan Federal University
  • Tatyana G. Sobakina North-Eastern Federal University
Keywords: digitization of education, SMART, STEM and STEAM integrated learning technologies, technology, didactic properties and functions, integrative teaching potential, synergistic effect.

Abstract

At the current stage of digitization of the Russian economy, educational institutions urgently need new, more advanced and effective training technologies that help improve the quality of training of highly competent and competitive specialists who comply with the social order of society digital. These technologies should promote the introduction of robotic and cyber-physical systems in the training of future specialists. The article shows that SMART, STEM and STEAM integrated learning technologies that encompass the theoretical and practical components of educational programs with the help of special technological equipment: robotic complexes, virtual learning tools and cyber systems, can be used as technologies in the digital education. It is proven that the practical application of mathematical, physical, engineering and technological knowledge, modeling and design of robotic cybernetic devices and others, allow us to more effectively solve the tasks of the competition-oriented educational paradigm, create additional conditions for the development and realization of the personal potential of the students. The integrative didactic potential of SMART, STEM and STEAM technologies is determined, ensuring the achievement of the synergistic effect in the educational process and increasing the productivity of education subjects through the combination of the individual means of the technologies studied in a single system. The advantages of digital education are analyzed, which are optimized using the integrative teaching potential of SMART, STEM and STEAM technologies. Based on the characteristics of the integrative didactic potential of SMART, STEM and STEAM technologies, it is concluded that they are promising in the era of the digitization of Russian education and viable to use them in order to maintain the effectiveness of the educational process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Nikolaevich Aniskin, Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Professor of Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Russia.
Aleksandr A. Korostelev, Togliatti State University
Professor of Togliatti State University
Busygina Alla Lvovna, Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Professor of Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Anatoly V. Kurochkin, Kazan Federal University
Professor of Kazan Federal University
Tatyana G. Sobakina, North-Eastern Federal University
Professor of North-Eastern Federal University

References

Akhmetzhanova G.V., Yuryev A.V. (2018). Digital technologies in education. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. T. 7. No. 3 (24). S. 334-336.

Aniskin V.N., Gorbatov S.V., Dobudko A.V., Dobudko T.V. (2016). Monitoring and evaluation in the new electronic information educational environment of high school. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. T. 5. No. 4 (17). S. 36-40.

Averin, S.A., & Markova, V.A. (2017). Stem-technologies in education: fashion or reality?. In The child in the modern educational space of a metropolis (pp. 193-202).

Bobyshev E.N. (2015). About mechanisms of implementation of strategy of progress information society. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. No. 1 (10). S. 21-23.

Budnyk, O. (2018). Theoretical principles of using STEAM-technologies in the preparation of the teacher of the New Ukrainian School. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5 (1), 23-30.

Dneprovskaya, N.V., & Yankovskaya, E.A. (2015). Key concepts for smart education concepts 1. Russia: trends and development prospects, (10-2).

Dubrovina, I.V. (2018). Psychological problems of raising children and schoolchildren in the information society. National Psychological Journal, (1 (29)).

Glukhov, V.V., & Vasetskaya, N.O. (2017). Smart education as a tool to improve the quality of vocational training. Questions of teaching methods in high school, 6 (21).

Gyshchina O.M. (2015). Competence approach in creation of the information and educational environment of knowledge with using of electronic resources. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2015. No. 2 (11). S. 49-52.

Habib-Mireles, L.; Zambrano, G.; Hernández, M. (2015). Eficacia de un programa internacional para mejorar el rendimiento académico en Ingeniería, Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 6 (14), 67-86.

Idrisov, G.I., Knyaginin, V.N., Kudrin, A. L., & Rozhkova, E. S. (2018). New technological revolution: challenges and opportunities for Russia. Economic Issues, 4, 5-25.

Ivinskaya M. S. (2017). Improving the quality of education based on use of the electronic information and educational environment. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. T. 6. No. 1 (18). S. 73-75.

Klemasheva E.I. (2018). The tools of reproduction and stimulation of the engagement of human capital in the new industrialization. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. T. 7. No. 3 (24). S. 116-119.

Krasilnikova, V.A. (2012). The use of information and communication technologies in education: textbook. manual for universities.

Mahotin, D.A. (2018). SMART in education: a new approach or the impact of technology ?. Interactive Education, (5), 13-15.

Matveeva A.V., Krotova E.A. (2017). Applying of the opportunities of the electronic educational environment in ecological education. Karelian Scientific Journal. T. 6. No. 2 (19). S. 26-28.

Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H., & Augusto, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer Science & Business Media.

Prigogine, A.I. (2003). Organization development methods.

Sharipov, F. F., & Source, R. S. I. I. A. R. of operational and objective educational information Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology. 2017. T. 6. No. 2 (19). S. 188, 191.

Shubina, I.V. (2015). Smart and the development of modern education. Eurasian Union of Scientists, (3-1 (12)).

Timofeev, A.G., Lebedinskaya, O.G., & Bilenko, A.V. (2019). Digital economy: realities, prospects and development priorities. Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation, (2-1).

Vanyukova, A.A. (2018). Professional competence of an additional education teacher in organizing research activities of students in the system of additional education. Scientific and practical education, research training, STEAM education: new types of educational situations (pp. 190-195).

Zavrazhin, A. V. (2015). Smart and humanitarian aspects of teaching in high school. Statistics and Economics, (3).

Published
2020-03-26
How to Cite
Aniskin, V. N., Korostelev, A. A., Lvovna, B. A., Kurochkin, A. V., & Sobakina, T. G. (2020). Teaching potential of integrated learning technologies Smart, Stem and Steam. Journal of the University of Zulia , 11(29), 328-336. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rluz/article/view/31456

Most read articles by the same author(s)