Asociatividad empresarial y liderazgo ambidiestro como generadores de innovación

• Olga Inés Vélez Bernal
• Jaime Alberto Beltrán Ríos
• José Antonio López Giraldo
• Francisco Javier Arias Vargas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v25i2.27333

Palabras clave: Asociatividad empresarial, liderazgo ambidiestro, innovación, explotación, exploración.

Resumen

Los retos que el mundo plantea hoy a los empresarios y directivos, hacen que sea necesario buscar nuevas formas de liderar y de innovar, una de estas formas es por medio de la asociatividad empresarial. En este sentido, el objetivo del artículo consiste en proporcionar un modelo conceptual en función del liderazgo, la innovación y la asociatividad empresarial, donde se muestra la relación existente entre los tres términos anteriores; planteando la posibilidad para las empresas, de conseguir nuevas oportunidades, al mismo tiempo que trabajan para obtener en sus actividades cotidianas buen rendimiento. Se hace un análisis a partir de una revisión de literatura de artículos de alto impacto entre los años 1990 y 2018. Entre los resultados destaca que son pocos los artículos observados de liderazgo ambidiestro, por lo cual es una oportunidad de mostrar los hallazgos encontrados, donde se plantea como conclusión que las empresas que poseen actividades de asociación y además poseen un liderazgo ambidiestro, llevan a las organizaciones a lograr mejores resultados de innovación ambidiestra.

Citas

Abdul Qadir Rahomee, Ahmed Aljanabi; Nor Azila, Mohd Noor y Dileep, Kumar M. (2014). “The mediating role of absorptive capacity in its effect on organizational support factors and technological innovation”. Information Management and Business Review. Vol. 6, No. 1. United Arab Emirates. Pp. 25-41.

Ahlers, Martina y Wilms, Maximilian (2017). Ambidextrous leadership in innovation: A multiple case study of Innovation leader son the alignment of opening and closing leader behaviors. Master’s tesis. Linköping University Department of Management and Engineering (IEI). Pp. 109.

Algahtani, Ali (2014). “Are leadership and management different? A review”. Journal of Management Policies and Practices. Vol. 2, No. 3. United States. Pp. 71-82.

Allio, Michael (2012). “Strategic dashboards: Designing and deploying them to improve implementation”. Strategy & Leadership. Vol. 40, No. 5. United Kingdom Pp. 24-31.

Bayo-Moriones, Alberto y Lera-López, Fernando (2007). “A firm-level analysis of determinants of ICT adoption in Spain”. Technovation. Vol. 27, No. 6. United States. Pp. 352-366.

Birkinshaw, Julian y Gupta, Kamini (2013). “Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies”. The Academy of Management Perspectives. Vol. 27, No. 4. United States. Pp. 287-298.

Bledow, Ronald; Frese, Michael; Anderson, Neil; Erez, Miriam y Farr, James (2009). “A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 2, No. 3. United Kingdom. Pp. 305-337.

Cabaleiro, Goretti; Jiménez, Alejandro; Miles, John y Horta, Roberto (2016). “Liderazgo e innovación para un mundo más sostenible”. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. Vol. 11, No. 1. Chile. Pp. 2-5.

Calantone, Roger. J; Cavusgil, Tamer y Zhao, Yushan (2002). “Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance”. Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 31, No. 6. Netherlands. Pp. 515-524.

Castro, Alejandro y Lupano, María (2005). “Diferencias individuales en las teorías implícitas del liderazgo y la cultura organizacional percibida”. Boletín de Psicología. No. 85. España. Pp. 89-109.

Cerne, Matej; Jaklic, Marko y Skerlavaj, Miha (2013). “Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective”. Leadership. Vol. 9, No. 1 United Kingdom. Pp. 63–85.

Croitoru, Alin (2012). “Reseña del libro: Schumpeter, JA, 1934 (2008). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle”. Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology. Vol. 3, No. 2. Romania. Pp. 137-148.

Da Silva, Fabio; Monteiro, Cleviton; dos Santos, Igor y Capretz, Luis Fernando (2016). “How software development group leaders influence team members, innovative behavior”. IEEE Software. Vol. 33, No. 5. United States. Pp. 106-109.

De Oslo, Manual (2007). Directrices para la recogida e interpretación de información relativa a innovación. México. OCDE-Eurostat.

Denison, Daniel; Hooijberg, Robert y Quinn, Robert (1995). “Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership”. Organization Science. Vol. 6, No. 5. United States. Pp. 524-540.

Deschamps, Jean-Philippe (2008). Innovation leaders: How senior executives stimulate, steer and sustain innovation. Oxford, UK. John Wiley and Sons.

Freeman, Christopher (1991). “Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues”. Research Policy. Vol. 20, No. 5. Netherlands. Pp. 499-514.

García-Morales, Víctor Jesús; Jiménez-Barrionuevo, María Magdalena y Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Leopoldo (2012). “Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation”. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 65, No. 7. Netherlands. Pp. 1040-1050.

Gibson, Cristina y Birkinshaw, Julian (2004). “The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 47, No. 2. United States. Pp. 209-226.

Gilsing, Victor y Bart, Nooteboom (2006). “Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology”. Research Policy. Vol. 35, No. 1. Netherlands. Pp. 1-23.

Gong, Yaping; Huang, Jia-Chi y Farh, Jiing-Lih (2009). “Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 52, No. 4. United States. Pp. 765–778.

Gumusluoglu, Lale y Ilsev, Arzu (2009). “Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation”. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 62, No. 4. Netherlands. Pp. 461–473.

Gunday, Gurhan; Ulusoy, Gunduz; Kilic, Kemal y Alpkan, Lutfihak (2011). “Effects of innovation types on firm performance”. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 133, No. 2. Netherlands. Pp. 662-676.

Gupta, Anil; Smith, Ken y Shalley, Christina (2006). “The interplay between exploration and exploitation”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 49, No. 4. United States. Pp. 693–706.

Havermans, Liselore; Den Hartog, Deanne; Keegan, Anne y Uhl-Bien, Mary (2015). “Exploring the role of leadership in enabling contextual ambidexterity”. Human Resource Management. Vol. 54, No. S1. United States. Pp. 179-200.

He, Zi-Lin y Wong, Poh-Kam (2004). “Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis”. Organization Science. Vol. 15, No. 4. United States. Pp. 481–494.

Herrmann, Daniel y Felfe, Jörg (2013). “Moderators of the relationship between leadership style and employee creativity: The role of task novelty and personal initiative”. Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 25, No. 2. United States. Pp. 172–181.

Isaksen, Scott y Akkermans, Hans (2011). “Creative climate: A leadership lever for innovation”. Journal of Creative Behavior. Vol. 45, No. 3. United States. Pp. 161–187.

Jansen, Justin; Van den Bosch, Frans y Volberda, Henk (2005). “Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents”. Schmalenbach Business Review. Vol. 57, No. 4. Pp. 351-363.

Kaasa, Anneli y Vadi, Maaja (2008). “How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 19, No. 7. United Kingdom. Pp. 583-604.

Keller, Tobías y Weibler, Jürgen (2015). “What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager: linking leadership and cognitive strain to balancing exploration and exploitation”. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. Vol. 22, No. 1. United States. Pp. 54-71.

Kindström, Daniel; Kowalkowski, Christian y Sandberg, Erik (2013). “Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach”. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 66, No. 8. Netherlands. Pp. 1063-1073.

Lavie, Dovev; Kang, Jingoo y Rosenkopf, Lori (2011). “Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances”. Organization Science. Vol. 22, No. 6. United States. Pp. 1517-1538.

Liendo, Mónica y Martínez, Adriana (2001). Asociatividad. Una alternativa para el desarrollo y crecimiento de las PYMES. Pp. 311-319. Sextas Jornadas de Investigaciones en la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadísticas. Argentina.

Lundvall, Bengt-Ake (Ed) (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London. Anthem press. Pp. 404.

March, James (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”. Organization Science. Vol. 2, No. 1. United States. Pp. 71–87.

Norouzy, Ali; Dalfard, Vahid; Azhdari, Behnaz; Nazari-Shirkouhi, Salman y Rezazadeh, Aliasghar (2013). “Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol. 64, No. 5-8. Germany. Pp. 1073-1085.

Northouse, Peter (2015). Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and practice. 7th. Edition. USA. Thousand Oaks. Sage Publication.

Omar, Nor; Nazri, Muhamad; Shah, Syed y Ahmad, Azhar (2016). “Assessing the Factors Influencing Service Innovation Capabilities and Performance”. Information Management And Business Review. Vol.8, No. 4. United Arab Emirates. Pp. 52-63.

Pallares, Zoilo (1999). “La asociatividad empresarial: Una respuesta de los pequeños productores a la internacionalización de las economías”. Programa de Desarrollo Empresarial Sectorial. Acopi, Bogotá.

Perez Perdomo, Silvia; Farrow, Andrew; Trienekens, Jacques y Omta, Onno (2016). “Stakeholder roles for fostering ambidexterity in Sub-Saharan African agricultural netchains for the emergence of multi-stakeholder cooperatives”. Journal on Chain and Network Science. Vol. 16, No. 1. Netherlands. Pp. 59-82.

Raisch, Sebastian; Birkinshaw, Julian; Probst, Gilbert y Tushman, Michael (2009). “Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance”. Organization Science. Vol. 20, No. 4. United States. Pp. 685–695.

Rosing, Kathrin; Frese, Michael y Bausch, Andreas (2011). “Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 22, No. 5. United Kingdom. Pp. 956-974.

Samad, Saki; Shakiba, Hodjat y Savari, Moslem (2013). “Study of the relationship between the organizational learning and organizational innovation at University of Tehran”. E-Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership. Vol. 11, No. 1. United States. Pp. 1-18.

Saunila, Minna; Pekkola, Sanna y Ukko, Juhani (2014). “The relationship between innovation capability and performance: The moderating effect of measurement”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Vol. 63, No. 2. United Kingdom. Pp. 234-249

Schumpeter, Joseph (1934). Theory of economic development. Cambridge, Massachussetts. Harvard University Press.

Silvia, Paul; Wigert, Benjamin; Reiter-Palmon, Roni y Kaufman, James (2012). “Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Vol. 6, No. 1. United States. Pp. 19–34.

Simsek, Zeki; Heavey, Ciaran; Veiga, John y Souder, David (2009). “A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes”. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 46, No. 5. United Kingdom. Pp. 864-894.

Smith, Wendy y Lewis, Marianne (2011). “Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing”. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 36, No. 2. United States. Pp. 381-403.

Taylor, Alba y Helfat, Constance (2009). “Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity”. Organization Science. Vol. 20, No. 4. United States. Pp. 718–739.

Tiwana, Amrit (2010). “Systems development ambidexterity: explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls”. Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 27, No. 2. United States. Pp. 87-126.

Turner, Neil; Maylor Harvey y Swart, Juani (2015). “Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective”. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 33, No. 1. United Kingdom. Pp. 177-188.

Turner, Neil; Swart, Juani y Maylor, Harvey (2013). “Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda”. International Journal of Management Reviews. Vol. 15, No. 3. United Kingdom. Pp. 317-332.

Tushman, Michael y O’Reilly III, Charles (1996). “Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change”. California Management Review. Vol. 38, No. 4. United States. Pp. 8-29.

Tushman, Michael y O’Reilly III, Charles (2013). “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, present, and future”. The Academy of Management Perspectives. Vol. 27, No. 4. United States. Pp. 324-338.

Vaccaro, Ignacio; Jansen, Justin; Van Den Bosch, Frans y Volberda, Henk (2012). “Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size”. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 49, No. 1. United Kingdom. Pp. 28-51.

Villarán, Fernando (2000). Las pymes en la estructura empresarial peruana. Servicios para el Desarrollo, SASE. Lima. Perú. Disponible en: http://www.decon.edu.uy/network/panama/VILLARAN.PDF Consulta realizada el 10 de octubre de 2018.

Volmer, Judith; Spurk, Daniel y Niessen, Cornelia (2012). “Leader-member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement”. Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 23, No. 3. United Kingdom. Pp. 456–465.

Wang, Peng y Rode, Joseph (2010). “Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate”. Human Relations. Vol. 63, No. 8. United States. Pp. 1105–1128.

Wang, Peng y Zhu, Weichun (2011). “Mediating role of creative identity in the influence of transformational leadership on creativity: Is there a multilevel effect?” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. Vol. 18, No. 1. United States. Pp. 25–39.

Yoshida, Diah; Tuhfat, Sendjaya; Hirst, Giles y Cooper, Brian (2014). “Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality”. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 67, No. 7. Netherlands. Pp. 1395–1404.

Yukl, Gary (2002). Leadership in organizations. Englewoods Cliffs. Prentice Hall.

Zacher, Hannes y Johnson, Emily (2014). “Leadership and creativity in higher education”. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 40, No. 7. United Kingdom. Pp. 1210-1225

Zacher, Hannes; Robinson, Alecia y Rosing, Kathrin (2016). “Ambidextrous leadership and employees self reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors”. The Journal of Creative Behavior. Vol. 50, No. 1. United States. Pp. 24-46.

Zhou, Jing y Hoever, Inga (2014). “Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection”. Annual. Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Vol. 1. United States. Pp. 333-359.