Metaphor and Comparison in the Portrait Characteristics of the Heroes of the Novel “We” as an Indicator of the Ye. Zamyatin’s Idiostyle: Cognitive-Functional Aspect

  • Elena Evgenievna Kotsova
  • Tatyana Alexandrovna Sidorova
  • Ekaterina Vladimirovna Zamarina
  • Ludmila Viktorovna Gurlenova
  • Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to identify the use of metaphors and comparisons characterizing the appearance of the heroes of the anti-utopian novel “We” by Yevgeny Zamyatin in cognitive and functional aspects. It has been prov- en that the keywords of the thematic group “Human Appearance” and their lexical environment manifest the specificity of the individual style, includ- ing the writer’s cognitive style. The study focuses on the semantic features of metaphor and comparison in the lexical connections of the keywords of this group, as well as the knowledge formats behind these figurative means, which form the text’s conceptual structure. The specificity of the function- ing of figurative means as a mode of expressing the author’s intentions and his cognitive ability has been defined. Analysis of the metaphors and com- parisons in the text fragments containing the description of the heroes’ ap- pearances allowed revealing such features of Zamyatin’s idiostyle as the high “density” of figurative and expressive means, dominance of metaphors, epithets and comparisons among figurative means, the prevalence of semantic occasionalisms and the author’s comparisons in metaphor composition, cognitive-semantic specificity of metaphorization based on the “donor”-sphere, and the “geometricity” of figurative means characterizing the details of the appearance of the heroes. It is shown that the cognitive style’s specificity manifests itself in the actualization of con- cepts important for the writer, the formation of new conceptual meanings, usage of cognitive mechanisms in the emergence of new meanings, mix- ture of modes of world perception, re-categorization and polycategoriza- tion of text meanings, interaction of conceptual spheres, structure of new semantic models, etc. All this allows the writer to create colorful, expres- sive portrait features, express his own attitude to the characters and present an original individual picture of the world.

Author Biographies

Elena Evgenievna Kotsova
Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Tatyana Alexandrovna Sidorova
Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Ekaterina Vladimirovna Zamarina
Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Ludmila Viktorovna Gurlenova
Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State UniversitySyktyvkar, Russia
Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva
Murmansk Arctic State University Murmansk, Russia

References

Altabaeva, E. V. (2009a). Zamyatinskii tekst kak obekt lingvokulturologii [Zamyatin’s text as an object of cultural linguistics]. Filologicheskaya regionalistika, 1-2, 74-78.

Altabaeva, E. V. (2009b). Zamyatinskii tekst: Yazyk i kontseptosfera (K metodologii issledovaniya) [Zamyatin’s text: Language and conceptual sphere (To the research methodology)]. In Literaturovedenie na sovremennom etape: Teoriya. Istoriya literatury. Tvorcheskie individualnosti: Materialy Mezhdunar. kongressa literaturovedov [Literary criticism at the present stage: Theory. Literary history. Creative individuality: Materials of the Intern. Congress of Literary Critics]. Tambov: Izdatelskii dom TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, pp. 505-510.

Altabaeva, E. V. (Ed.). (2011). Zamyatinskii tekst kak yavlenie russkoi kultury i dukhovnosti [Zamyatin’s text as a phenomenon of Russian culture and spirituality]. Tambov: Izd-vo R. V. Pershina.

Bolotnova, N. S. (2009). Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta [Communicative text style]. In Bolotnova, N. S. Slovar-tezaurus [Dictionary thesaurus]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.

Churilina, L. N. (2002). Leksicheskaya struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta: Printsipy antropologicheskogo issledovaniya [Lexical structure of a literary text: Principles of anthropological research]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena.

Fotinova, Yu. Yu. (2012). Kontseptualnaya semantika prostranstva v zamyatinskom tekste [Conceptual semantics of space in Zamyatin’s text]. Tambov.

Kotsova, E. E., & Korelskaya, N. S. (2012). Kharakteristika vneshnosti geroev v leksicheskoi strukture teksta romana E. Zamyatina “My” [Characteristics of the appearance of the characters in the lexical structure of the text of the novel by Ye. Zamyatin “We”]. In Chernyak, V. D. (Ed.). Slovo. Slovar. Slovesnost (K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. I. Gertsena): Materialy Vseros. nauch. konferentsii [Word. Vocabulary. Literature (On the 200th anniversary of the birth of A. I. Herzen): Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference]. Saint Petersburg: SAGA, pp. 173-177.

Latkina, T. V. (2006). Otsenochnye sravneniya i metafora v poeticheskikh i prozaicheskikh tekstakh I. A. Bunina [Evaluative comparisons and metaphor in poetic and prose texts of I. A. Bunin]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta: Filologicheskie nauki, 5(18), 50-55.

Lebedeva, E. A. (2012). Kategoriya vremeni i sredstva ee predstavleniya v zamyatinskom tekste [Category of time and means of its presentation in Zamyatin’s text]. Tambov.

Mayasov, V. E. (2011). Glagoly rechevoi deyatelnosti v kontseptualnom prostranstve zamyatinskogo teksta [Verbs of speech activity in the conceptual space of Zamyatin’s text]. Michurinsk.

Mikhailov, N. M., & Mikhailova, N. V. (2002). Glaza v literature XX veka [Eyes in 20th century literature]. Russkaya rech, 1, 17-26.

Mikhailov, O. N. (1989). Grossmeister literatury [Grandmaster of literature]. In Zamyatin, Ye. I. Izbrannoe [Selected works]. Moscow: Pravda, pp. 3-28.

Polyakova, L. V. (2008). Sovremennoe zamyatinovedenie v Tambovskom krae: Poiski molodykh issledovatelei [Modern Zamyatin studies in the Tambov region: The search of young researchers]. In Aspekty issledovaniya yazykovykh edinits i kategorii v rusistike XXI veka: Sb. mat-lov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (27-28 noyabrya 2007 g.) [Aspects of the study of language units and categories in Russian studies of the 21st century: Collection of materials of the International Scientific Conference (November 27-28, 2007)]. Michurinsk: MGPI, pp. 47-54.

Shmid, U. (2008). “My” Zamyatina. Opyt apoliticheskogo prochteniya [Zamyatin’s “We”. Experience of apolitical reading]. In Subspecietolerantiae. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 479-493.

Sidorova, T. A. (2004). Istoriko-kulturnye komponenty kontseptualnoi struktury khudozhestvennogo vremeni [Historical and cultural components of the conceptual structure of artistic time]. Russkii yazyk v shkole, 1, 71-77.

Stepanova, V. V. (2006). Slovo v tekste: Iz lektsii po funktsionalnoi leksikologii [Word in text: From lectures on functional lexicology]. Saint Petersburg.

Tolmacheva, O. V. (2012). Sovremennoe otechestvennoe zamyatinovedenie: Itogi i perspektivy [Modern domestic Zamyatin studies: Results and prospects]. Tambov.

Vinogradov, V. V. (1959). O yazyke khudozhestvennoi literatury [On the language of fiction]. Moscow: Goslitizdat, pp. 84-166.

Zakhidova, L. S. (2009). Spetsifika idiostilya Yu. Polyakova: Leksiko-semanticheskii aspekt [Specificity of the idiostyle of Yu. Polyakov: Lexico-semantic aspect]. Abakan.

Zamyatin, Ye. I. (2006). My. Povesti. Rasskazy [We. Novellas. Short stories]. Moscow: Drofa.

Published
2019-08-03
How to Cite
Evgenievna Kotsova, E., Alexandrovna Sidorova, T., Vladimirovna Zamarina, E., Viktorovna Gurlenova, L., & Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva, O. (2019). Metaphor and Comparison in the Portrait Characteristics of the Heroes of the Novel “We” as an Indicator of the Ye. Zamyatin’s Idiostyle: Cognitive-Functional Aspect. Opción, 35, 1284-1296. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/30450

Most read articles by the same author(s)