The Complex Of Environmental Ideas In The Prose Of The 1920s-1930s And Methods Of Its Artistic Presentation
Resumen
The article is relevant since it studies such an important function of the literature of the first third of the 20th century as its active discussion of fun- damental issues, including the role of nature in the Earth development, the attitude of people towards it and ways of raising environmental awareness. The article aims to explore environmental ideas of S. Klychkov’s and L. Leonov’s prose depicting a folk lifestyle in the context of natural environ- ment and folk culture preserving mythological views on nature, as well as to reveal the artistic implementation of their environmental concepts. The ar- ticle states that these writers were opponents of the mechanistic worldview (the philosophical basis of technocracy rapidly developing in science and culture); they presented nature as a living organism that can function only as an entity. This idea was considered from different perspectives and was represented as a complex of interrelated aspects. Environmental ideas in the artistic world of S. Klychkov’s and L. Leonov’s works were expressed in ac- cordance with the depicted layer of national life and culture. The key to their understanding is ideas about the world contained in etiological, cosmogonic and eschatological myths. Based on these ideas, both writers create their own myth about the struc- ture of nature: its inner organization, natural objects, phenomena and forc- es. They created the artistic world of their works with the logic of scientif- ic knowledge in order to systematize ideas and mythological projections, restore mythological thinking based on archetypal images, motives and principles of creating the mythological-poetic worldview. Environmental ideas include such aspects as philosophical, aesthetic and ethical, i.e. they are the result of the writers’ comprehensive understanding of nature and the person’s attitude towards it.Citas
Afanasyev, A.N. (1868). Poeticheskie vozzreniya slavyan na prirodu: Opyt sravnitelnogo izucheniya slavyanskikh predani i iverovanii, v svyazi s mifologicheskimi skazaniyami drugikh rodstvennykh narodov. Poetic beliefs of the Slavs about nature: The comparative study of the Slavic myths and convictions in relation to mythological fables of kindred people. Moscow: Izdatelstvo K. Soldatenkova.
Fedorov, N.F. (1982). Sochineniya. Moscow: Mysl.
Gorky, M. (1953a). Sobraniesochinenii. The collection of works: in thirty volumes, Volume 24. Moscow: GIKhL.
Gorky, M. (1953b). Sobraniesochinenii. The collection of works: in thirty volumes, Volume 26. Moscow: GIKhL.
Gorky, M. (1953c). Sobraniesochinenii. The collection of works: in thirty volumes, Volume 27. Moscow: GIKhL.
Groznova, N.A. (1982). Tvorchestvo Leonida Leonovaitraditsiirusskoiklassicheskoiliteratury: Ocherki. Leonid Leonov's literary works and traditions of the Russian classical literature. Leningrad: Nauka.
Gurlenova, L.V. (2016). "Remontzemli": tekhnokraticheskayautopiya v russkoi literature 1920-1930-kh godov "Earth repair": technocratic utopia in the Russian literature of the 1920s-1930s. Rusistika. Mezhdunarodnyizhurnal, 1, 175-191.
Ilichev, L.F., Fedoseev, P.N., Kovalev, S.M., Panov, V.G. (1983). Filosofskiientsiklopedicheskiislovar Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskayaentsiklopediya.
Klychkov, S. (1988). ChertukhinskiiBalakir: Romany ChertukinskiiBalakir: novels. Moscow: Sovetskiipisatel.
Klychkov, S. (1989). Perepiska, sochineniya, materialy k biografii. Letters, essays and bibliographical materials. Novyimir, 9, 193-224.
Kultysheva, O.M. (2013). Literaturno-khudozhestvennyeobedineniyaRossiipervoipolovinyХХveka: vzglyadmayakoveda [The Russian literary and artistic associations in the first half of the 20th century: from the viewpoint of Mayakovsky's researcher: Student's textbook. Nizhnevartovsk: Izd-voNizhnevart. gos. un-ta.
Leonov, L.M. (1981). Sobraniesochinenii. The collection of works: in ten volumes, Volume 1. Moscow: Khudozhestvennayaliterature.
Leonov, L.M. (1982). Sobraniesochinenii. The collection of works: in ten volumes, Volume 2. Moscow: Khudozhestvennayaliterature.
Lysov, A.G. (1988). Ranneetvorchestvo Leonida Leonova. Kontseptsiyakultury. Leonid Leonov's early creative works. The concept of culture: an extended abstract of dissertation for a Candidate's of Philological Sciences degree. Leningrad, The Institute of Russian Literature, the Pushkin House.
Musienko, R.A. (2005). Khudozhestvennayasistemaromanov S. Klychkova v mifopoeticheskomkontekste. The artistic system of S. Klychkov's novels in the mythopoetic context: thesis for a Doctor's of Philological Sciences degree. Krasnodar, the Kuban State University, 184.
Naidysh, V.M. (1994). Mifotvorchestvoifolklornoesoznanie [Myth-making and folk consciousness]. Voprosyfilosofii, 2, 45-53.
Nepomnyashchikh, N.A. (2011). Motivyrusskoiliteratury v tvorchestve L.M. Leonova [Motives of the Russian literature in L.M. Leonov's works]: monograph. Novosibirsk, 177.
Petisheva, V.A. (2007). Romany L.M. Leonova 1920-1990-kh godov: evolyutsiya, poetika, strukturazhanra. L.M. Leonov's novels in the 1920s-1990s: evolution, poetics, genre structure: thesis for a Doctor's of Philological Sciences degree. Birsk, Birsk State Socio-Pedagogical Academy, 480.
Platonov, A. (1990). Chute pravdy [The sense of truth]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya.
Savodnik, V.F. (1911). Chuvstvoprirody v poeziiPushkina, LermontovaiTyutcheva [The image of nature in the poetry of Pushkin, Lermontov and Tyutchev]. Moscow: Tovarishchestvo "Pechatnya S.P. Yakovleva".
Solntseva, N.M. (1993). PosledniiLel: O zhizniitvorchestveSergeyaKlychkova. The last Lel: Sergey Klychkov's life and literary works. Moscow: Mosk. Rabochii.
Tsiolkovsky, K.E. (1991). Neizvestnyerazumnyesily. Unknown intelligent forces. Moscow: Mosk. rabochii.
Tsiolkovsky, K.E. (1992). Utopisty. ZhivayaVselennaya. Utopianists. The living universe. Voprosyfilosofii, 6, 132-158.
Voronskii, A.K. (1963). Literaturno-kriticheskiestati. Literary-critical articles. Moscow: Sov. pisatel.
