Mediation as a way to resolve disputes related to the contractual regulation of the use of reproductive technologies

La mediación como forma de resolver disputas relacionadas con la regulación contractual del uso de tecnologías reproductivas

• Oleg S. Bilanov Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-7638
• Tetiana О. Kharchenko Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9896-6126
• Halyna V. Lavryk Higher educational establishment of Ukoopspilka “Poltava University of Economics and Trade”, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-4327
• Viktoriia V. Prokopenko Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5368-0674

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.05

Palabras clave: mediación y tecnologías reproductivas, maternidad subrogada, resolución de conflictos, litigios, acuerdo

Resumen

El enfoque de resolución de la controversia que traslada un conflicto a las autoridades jurisdiccionales para su examen, está perdiendo vigencia en la actualidad. El estudio presenta el análisis de la práctica relacionada con la resolución de conflictos surgidos en el ámbito de la aplicación de tecnologías reproductivas a través de la mediación. Los autores han analizado datos estadísticos, práctica judicial, encuestas sobre el uso de tecnologías reproductivas. Las ventajas de recurrir a la mediación en el ámbito de las tecnologías reproductivas son la rapidez, el menor coste, la falta de formalismo, un procedimiento más sencillo para resolver este tipo de conflictos, la aplicación a discreción de los participantes, la garantía de total confidencialidad, la objetividad de la resolución de un conflicto con la participación de una tercera parte neutral, teniendo en cuenta el interés superior del menor. El acuerdo de mediación es también un segmento independiente del derecho civil y no puede identificarse con un acuerdo de conciliación, sino sólo ser la base para su adopción ya en los procedimientos judiciales. En conclusión, comparando las desventajas y ventajas del uso de la mediación en el ámbito de las tecnologías reproductivas, se puede afirmar que estas últimas prevalecen significativamente.

Citas

ALEXANDER, Nadja; CLARE, Samantha; RYCE, Lee. 2021.What’s happening in International Mediationin 2021. Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy. Available online. In: https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/ sites/sidra.smu.edu.sg/files/survey/84/index.html. Consultation date: 11/11/2022.

BORTNYK, Nadiya; TYLCHYK, Olha; GALINA, Lukyanova; SKOCHYLIAS-PAVLIV, Olha; REMENІAK, Olesіa. 2021. “Principles of mediation as an alternative way to protect human and citizen rights” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 70, pp. 238-249.

CHIANGA, Wan-Tsui; CHOUB, Tan-Yi. 2018. “A survey of judicial decisions concerning surrogacy disputes in Taiwan” In: International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. Vol. 57, No. 4.

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2004. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU). No. 40-41, pp. 42.

DONTSOV, Denys; NEUGОDNIKOV, Andryi; BIGNYAK, Oleksandr; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; PANOVA, Lyudmyla. 2021. “Online mediation due to the quarantine caused by COVID-19 Pandemic” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 68, pp. 914-926.

DRAFT LAW “On Mediation”. 2020. No. 3504 dated 19.05.2020 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Available online. In: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=68877. Consultation date: 11/11/2022.

DYACHENKO, Serhii; KOLOKOLNA, Natalia. 2020. “Introduction of mediation for the resolution off a mily disputes in civil proceedings of Ukraine: judicial practice” In: Jurid. nauk. Electronic journal / Zaporizhzhia National University. No. 2, pp. 118-121.

FAMILY CODE OF UKRAINE. 2002. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukrain. No. 21-22, pp.135.

FAMILY MEDIATION COUNCIL. 2020. Survey shows mediation issuccess ful in over 70% of case. Available online. In: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/2020/01/20/survey-shows-mediation-is-successful-in-over-70-of-cases/. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

INHORN, Marcia; BIRENBAUM-CARMELI, Daphna. 2008. “Annual Review of Anthropology” In: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change. Vol. 37. Available online. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

MALSKA, Marta; BORDUN, Orest. 2018. Medical tourism: theory and practice: textbook. K.: «Center of educational literature».

MAMNYTSKYI, Valerii; BELEY, Oleh; DULEPA, Viktoriia. 2019. “Mediationin civil proceedings: prospects for implementationin Ukraine” In: Actual problems of domestic jurisprudence. No. 3. pp. 59-63.

MAZARAKI, Natalia. 2018. “On the concept of mediaability of a dispute’ In: Entrepreneurship, economy and law. No. 12. pp. 258-262.

MAZARAKI, Natalia. 2019. “General characteristics of contracts concluded in the field of mediation” In: Entrepreneurship, economy and law. No. 2. pp. 171-175.

MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE. 2008. «Onapproval of the Procedure for the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Ukraine» 09.09.2013. No. 787. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z1697-13#Text. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

PODKOVENKO, Tatiana. 2020. “Models of mediation and its mechanisms” In: Actual problems of jurisprudence. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 12-2020.

RENÉ, Caroline; LANDRY, Isabelle; MONTIGNY, Francinede. 2022. “Couples’ experiences of pregnancy resulting from a ssisted reproductive technologies: A qualitati vemeta-synthesis” In: International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. Vol. 4.

REZVOROVYCH, Krystyna. 2019. “Features of the mediation procedure in the settlement of medical conflicts” In: Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. No. 1.

SAMUEL, Yancey. 2012. Made in India: A Film About Surrogacy. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association. Available online. In: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1352087?resultClick=1. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

SCHERRER, Emrush; ALLEMANN, Yves; SARTORI, Claudio; RIMOLDI, Stefano. 2015. “Cardiova sculardys function in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies” In: European Heart Journal. Available online. In: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/36/25/1583/2293387?searchresult=1. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

SHATKOVSKY, Yaroslav. 2011. “Institute of mediationas a way to protect the reproductive rights of citizens. Strategy of development of Ukraine. Economics, sociology, law. No. 1.

STARIKOVA, Natalia. 2018. Civilli ability in the field of application of assisted reproductive technologies: author’s dissertation cand. MIA of Ukraine, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

THOMA, Marie; BOULET, Sheree; MARTIN, Joyce; KISSIN, Dmitry. 2014. “Births Resulting From Assisted Reproductive Technology: Comparing Birth Certificateand National ART Surveillance System Data” In: National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 63. No. 8.

UNIFIED STATE REGISTER OF COURT DECISIONS. 2022. Available online.In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION. 1989. Convention on the Rightsof the Child. Available on line. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/995_021. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.

VERBA-SIDOR, Olga; VOROBEL, Ulyana; GRABAR, Natalia; DUTKO, Alyona; YURKEVYCH, Yuriy. 2021. Alternativewaysofresolvingcivildisputesu nderthelegislationofUkraine: textbook / edited by Candidate of Law, Associate Professor O. B. Verba-Sydor. Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Lviv, Ukraine.

ZALAR, Alesh. 2019. Comprehensive analysis of the current context, barriers and opportunities for the development of mediation with recommendations for the development and implementation of mediationin Ukraine. Available online. In: https://newjustice.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/New-Justice_Comprehensive_Analyses_on_-Mediation_-for_Ukraine_Ales_Zalar_UKR.pdf. Consultation date: 02/01/2023.