Organizational and procedural aspects of obtaining testimony during a court interrogation

Aspectos organizativos y de procedimiento de la obtención de testimonio durante un interrogatorio judicial

• Mykola Turkot Prosecutor General’s Office, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-8871
• Alla Ponomarenko Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-4485
• Ihor IIerusalymov European University, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3163-982X
• Serhiy Peretyatko Lviv Regional Prosecutor's Office, Lviv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-4254
• Oleksandr Shulha Nation Police of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-3061

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.18

Palabras clave: proceso penal, prueba, testimonio, interrogatorio judicial, táctica

Resumen

El artículo realiza un análisis significativo de los trabajos científicos y las normas del Código de Procedimiento Penal de Ucrania, que definen el concepto de testimonio como fuente procesal de prueba en los procesos penales, sus métodos de obtención, verificación y evaluación. Se ha estudiado la normativa legislativa y el procedimiento procesal del interrogatorio judicial de los participantes en un proceso penal. Se presta atención a ciertas innovaciones en la legislación que requieren comprensión científica, interpretación y elección de tácticas apropiadas por parte de un abogado defensor, fiscal y juez. La base metodológica del artículo es la aplicación compleja de métodos generales y métodos especiales de conocimiento científico en su relación, seleccionados teniendo en cuenta la finalidad y objetivos del estudio, su objeto y tema. A modo de conclusión, se fundamentan las propuestas y recomendaciones de carácter organizativo y táctico, encaminadas a mejorar la práctica policial para abordar los problemas existentes de obtención, verificación y evaluación de testimonios en el proceso de prueba.

Citas

BABUNYCH, Vladimir. 2011. “The essence and significance of cross-examination. Procedural features of cross-examination in criminal casesin court” In: Bulletin of Ivan Franko Lviv National University. The series is legal. No. 53, pp. 322 - 328.

BAEV, Oleg. 2003. Tactics of investigative actions. “Exam”, Moscow, Russia.

BEDRIZOV, Alexey. 2018. “Tactical recommendations for the judicial examination of witnesses in criminal cases” In: Proceedings of Tula State University. No. 2, pp. 32-37.

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS of 04.11.1950, ratified by the Law of Ukraine of 17.07.1997 № 475/97-VR. Available online. In: http://zakon2. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004. Consultation date: 26/10/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2012. On April 13. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17. Consultation date: 26/10/2021.

DEHTYAR, Oksana. 2013. “Implementation of the principle of immediacy of the examination of testimony ... Implementation of the principle of immediacy of the examination of testimony, things and documents during the trial of a criminal case by the court of first instance” In: Our right. No. 7, pp. 136-142.

EVANS, Keith. 1995. Advocacy in Court. A Beginner’s Guide. 1995. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

GONCHARENKO, Vladlen; NOR, Vasil; SHUMILO, Mykola. 2012. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary. Justinian. Kyiv, Ukraine.

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS. 1996. Adopted on December 16, 1966, by the UN General Assembly and ratified by Decree of the Presidium of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR
№ 2148-VIII of October 19, 1973. Available online. In: http://zakon1. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043. Consultation date: 26/10/2021.

KOHUTYCH, Ivan. 2009. The use of knowledge and tools of forensic tactics and methods in criminal proceedings in court. Monograph. Triada plus. Lviv, Ukraine.

KONOVALOVA, Valeria; SHEPITKO, Valeriy. 2008. Legal Psychology: Textbook. Second edition. Right. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

KOROBOV v. UKRAINE: judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (application № 39598/03). Available online. In: http://zakon2.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/974_790. Consultation date: 20/10/2021.

MAKSYMYSHYN, Natalia. 2016. Judicial interrogation: procedural and forensic investigation. Lviv, Ukraine.

McBRIDE, Jeremy. 2010. European Convention on Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. KIS, PP. 272–274. Kyiv, Ukraine.

ON SOME ISSUES OF PROCEDURE FOR TRIAL IN THE PROCEEDINGS AT FIRST INSTANCE UNDER THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE: Letter of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases of 05.10.2012 p. № 223-1446 / 0 / 4-12 Available online. In: http: // zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v1446740-12. Consultation date: 26/10/2021.

OSTERBURG, James; WARD, Richard; MILLER, Larry. 2010. Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, Sixth Edition. Routledge, England.

POHORETSKY, Mykola. 2008. “Investigative actions: concepts and classification” In: Scientific Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Internal Affairs: scientific-theoretical journal. No. 1, pp. 142148.

SHEPITKO, Valery. 2007. Forensic tactics: system – structural analysis: monograph. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

SHILO, Oksana. 2015. “General characteristics of testimony as a procedural source of evidence in criminal proceedings” In: Bulletin of criminal proceedings. No. 1, pp. 151 156.

TETERIATNYK, Hanna; RYZHYY, Oleksii; FEDOROVA, Anna; VYKHODETS, Yurii; MARKO, Vitalii. 2021. “Activities of the court to investigate the circumstances of criminal proceedings and their assessment under the laws of Ukraine” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 39, No. 70, pp. 195-211.

TURKOT, Mykola. 2020. Judicial interrogation: scientific and practical manual. The third edition, re-edited and supplemented by Turkot M. and others. Norm of Law, Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine.

VOROBIEV, George. 1998. Tactics and psychological features of judicial actions. Textbook. Krasnodar, Russia.

ZHUKOVSKY v. UKRAINE: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (application № 31240/03). Available online. In: http://zakon5.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/974_714 Consultation date: 26/10/2021.

ZINCHENKO, Pavel. 2011. Tactics of interrogation by the public prosecutor. Moscow, Russia.