American constitutionalism and the mid-19th-century nation

Palabras clave: Causas de la Guerra Civil, Constitucionalismo estadounidense, Sistema legal de Estados Unidos, esclavitud en la historia de Estados Unidos, historia jurídico-institucional

Resumen

Los autores del artículo han estudiado las causas de la Guerra Civil estadounidense teniendo debidamente en cuenta la historia del derecho constitucional. Esta investigación se basa en varios factores políticos, económicos, legales y culturales. Los autores utilizaron el método de análisis de documentos históricos. Tras analizar los precedentes judiciales y las tendencias históricas mundiales, han concluido que los institutos constitucionales de Estados Unidos perdieron su eficacia y se convirtieron en un arma en manos de los partidos en lucha durante la crisis constitucional. Como resultado, el sistema de compromisos de principios del siglo XIX se convirtió en una nueva estructura estatal y legal.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Roman Romashov, Murmansk Arctic State University

Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia.

Ekaterina Petrova, Ivanovo State University

Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russia.

Zurab Kalandarishvili, Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences

Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Victor Kovalev, Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences

Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Citas

BAKER, Jean H. 2004. James Buchanan: the American Presidents series: the 15th President, 1857-1861. Macmillan. New York, USA.

CAMPBELL, Stanley. 1970. The slave catchers: enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, 1850-1860. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.

CARLISLE, Rodney P. 2008. Civil war and reconstruction. Infobase Publishing. New York, USA.

CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. 2015. Constitutional law: principles and policies. Wolters Kluwer. New York, USA.

FEHRENBACHER, Don E. 1997. The Dred Scott case: its significance in American law and politics. Oxford University Publishing. Oxford, UK.

GOLDSTEIN, Leslie Friedman. 2011. “A ‘Triumph of freedom’ after all? Prigg v. Pennsylvania re-examined” In: Law and History Review. Vol. 29, pp. 763-796.

HURD, John. 1968. Law of freedom and bondage in the United States. Little Brown and Company. Boston, MA.

HUSTON, James L. 2003. Calculating the value of the union: slavery, property rights, and the economic origins of the civil war. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC., USA.

KACZOROWSKI, Robert J. 1986. “Revolutionary constitutionalism in the era of the civil war and reconstruction” In: New York University Law Review. Vol. 61, pp. 863-940.

KETTNER, James. 1978. The development of American citizenship, 1608-1870. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.

LOCKLEY, Fred. 1922. “The case of Robin Holmes vs. Nathaniel Ford” In: The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 111-137.

MCCLINTOCK, Russell. 2008. Lincoln and the decision for war: the northern response to secession. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.

MOUNTJOY, Shane. 2009. Causes of the civil war: the differences between the North and South. Infopress Publishing. New York, USA.

NADELHAFT, Jerome. 1966. “The Somersett case and slavery: myth, reality, and repercussions” In: Journal of Negro History. Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 193- 208.

SCHWARTZ, Bernard. 1997. A book of legal lists: the best and worst in American law. Oxford University Publishing. Oxford, UK.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1842. Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S.(16 Pet.) 539 (1842). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep041/usrep041539/usrep041539.pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1857. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http:// cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep060/usrep060393/usrep060393. pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1859. Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1859). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http://cdn. loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep062/usrep062506/usrep062506.pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.

VARON, Elizabeth R. 2008. Disunion: the coming of the American Civil War, 1789-1859. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.

WIECEK, William. 1977. The sources of antislavery Constitutionalism in America 1760-1848. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London. NY, USA.
Publicado
2021-12-18
Cómo citar
Romashov, R., Petrova, E., Kalandarishvili, Z., & Kovalev, V. (2021). American constitutionalism and the mid-19th-century nation. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(71), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.37
Sección
Derecho Público