Influence of legal principles on justice

• Yury Alexandrovich Svirin Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-2637
• Aleksey Vladimirovich Minbaleev South Ural State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-1802
• Eduard Eduardovich Artyukhov First Deputy of the Prosecutor of Saint Petersburg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7977-1515
• Sergej Nikolaevich Shestov Academy of Labor and Social Relations https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-1423
• Aleksey Anatolyevich Davydov Academy of Labor and Social Relations https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-2939

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.56

Palabras clave: principio de independencia del poder judicial, principio de verdad relativa, adversarialidad, principio de seguridad jurídica de los actos judiciales, principio de discrecionalidad judicial

Resumen

El objetivo del artículo fue determinar la esencia y la implementación legal en Rusia de principios tales como: independencia del poder judicial, verdad relativa, naturaleza contradictoria, certeza jurídica de los actos y discreción judiciales. En los países del ordenamiento jurídico romano-germánico, no es casualidad que los principios jurídicos sean de gran importancia científica y aplicada. La presencia de un determinado sistema de principios procesales permite evaluar la existencia de justicia en el país, la estabilidad de una decisión judicial y la equidad de los actos judiciales. Así, los principios de la ley afectan directamente el nivel de legalidad en cada estado. Actualmente, algunos principios de procedimiento dan lugar a una discusión en la doctrina rusa sobre su esencia y contenido. El tema se expone desde el punto de vista de los métodos científicos generales (análisis de sistemas, estructural y funcional, histórico), el método de análisis teórico, los métodos científicos específicos (jurisprudencia comparada, análisis técnico y jurídico, concretización, interpretación). La base teórica fue la teoría cognitiva. Se concluye que el principio de la independencia del poder judicial no es plenamente operativo en la Federación de Rusia.

Citas

ABUSHENKO, D.B. 2015. Discretion in civil and arbitration proceedings. Norma. Moscow, Russia.

BERG, L.N. 2007. “Problems of judicial discretion in the aspect of comparative studies” In: Akademicheskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 30, pp. 4-9.

BESPALOV, Yu.F. 2020. Commentary to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (article-by-article. 3rd ed. Prospekt. Moscow, Russia.

CHERNYSHEV, V.I. 2005. The thorny path to the truth. Lawyer’s notes, documents. UlGPU. Ulyanovsk, Russia.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1993. The Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights dated October 27 1993 in the case “Dombo Beheer v. Netherlands”. Available online In: https:// europeancourt.ru/uploads/ECHR_Dombo_Beheer_B_V_v_the_ Netherlands_27_10_1993.pdf. Consultation date: 15/02/2021.

GARNER, B.A; BLACK, H.C. 2009. Black’s Law Dictionary. West. St. Paul, USA. HART, H.L.A. 1994. The concept of Law. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press. Oxford, UK. ILYUSHINA, M.N. 2018. “Limits of judicial discretion and new civil legal
mechanisms for the protection of rights in connection with the upcoming judicial reform” In: Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. No. 8, pp. 15- 19.

KLEINMAN, A.F. 1954. Soviet civil procedure. Yuridicheskaya literatura. Moscow, Russia.

KLYUCHEVSKY, V.O. 1908. The course of Russian history. Tip. G. Lissnera i D. Sobko. Moscow, Russian empire.

KNYAZKIN, S.I. 2020. “Problems of the implementation of the principle of legal certainty in the framework of verification judicial activity in the civil law process” In: Vestnik SPbGU. Pravo. Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 319-341.

MALESHIN, D.Ya. 2011. The civil procedure system of the Russian Federation. Statut. Moscow, Russia.

MOMOTOV, V; FEDOTOV, M; IVANOV, A. 2019. “Scandalization of justice” In: Zakon. No. 4, pp. 35-53.

MUROMTSEV, S.A. 1877. Essays on the general theory of civil law. Part 1. Tip. A.I. Mamontova i K°. Moscow, Russian.
The original sources employed in this research were organized under the APA style.

Yury Alexandrovich Svirin, Aleksey Vladimirovich Minbaleev, Eduard Eduardovich Artyukhov, Sergej Nikolaevich Shestov y Aleksey Anatolyevich Davydov Influence of legal principles on justice

OSOKINA, G.L. 2006. Civil Procedure. General Part. Yurist. Moscow, Russia.

POKROVSKII, I.A. 1998. The main problems of civil law. Statut. Moscow, Russia.

RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONSTITUTION. 1993. Adopted by popular vote on 12 December 1993, with amendments approved by all-Russian vote on 1 July 2020. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/constitution-of-the- russian-federation-en/1680a1a237. Date of consultation: 26/02/2021.

SUPREME ARBITRATION (COMMERCIAL) COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2012. Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration (Commercial) Court of the Russian Federation dated November 20, 2012 No. 2013/12. Available online. In: http://www. arbitr.ru/bras.net/f.aspx?id_casedoc=1_1_7af65743-b878-4d28-b37b- 437a659ec078. Consultation date: 15/02/2021.

SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 1995. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated October 31, 1995 No. 8 “On some issues of the application of the Constitution by the courts Of the Russian Federation in the administration of justice” (as amended on February 6, 2007). Available online. In: https://www.vsrf. ru/documents/own/8342/. Consultation date: 15/02/2021.

SVIRIN, Yu.A; MOKHOV, A.A; MINBALEEV, A.V. 2021. “The concept of electronic justice and its development prospects in the Russian Federation” In: Laplage em Revista. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 108-118.

SVIRIN, Yu.A; SHESTOV, S.N. 2020. “On some challenges faced by the judicial power in the Russian Federation” In: Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Vol. 11, No. 3(49), pp. 1045-1052.

TARANETS, Yu.S. 2018. “The implementation of the principle of legal certainty during the encumbrance of the right to property” In: Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga. No. 1, pp. 81-90.

VAIPAN, V.A. 2020. “Judicial discretion in the practice of arbitration courts” In: Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki. No. 6, pp. 3-13.

VASKOVSKY, E.V. 1914. Textbook of civil procedure. Izdanie Br. Bashmakovykh. Moscow, Russian empire.

YABLOCHKOV, T. 1919. Collection of articles. In memory of Professor G. Shershenevich. Izd. br. Bashmakovykh. Moscow, Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic.

YUDELSON, K.S. 1956. Soviet Civil Procedure. Yuridicheskaya literatura. Moscow, Russia.