Seizure of property: development of legislation and improvement of law enforcement practice

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich  Ivanov; Igor Alekseevich  Antonov; Elena Nikolaevna  Кleshchina; Lenar Vazyhovich  Satdinov; Elena Vladimirovna  Blinova

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3970.55

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Ivanov Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO-University) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-3771
Igor Alekseevich Antonov St. Petersburg Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-1112
Elena Nikolaevna Кleshchina Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-4544
Lenar Vazyhovich Satdinov Academy of management of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-3451
Elena Vladimirovna Blinova Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named by V.Ya. Kikot https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-0372

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.55

Palabras clave: procedimientos criminales, evidencia material, confiscación de propiedad, garantías procesales, medidas de coacción procesal

Resumen

Se estudian cuestiones discutibles sobre la anulación de la medida de coacción procesal aplicada en forma de embargo de bienes en los supuestos de terminación de un proceso penal (persecución penal) con indemnización voluntaria por los daños ocasionados por un delito. Los autores proponen especificar los casos en los que es posible cancelar la incautación de bienes, es decir, en caso de expiración del plazo de detención impuesto sobre los bienes establecido por el tribunal, o denegación de prórroga, así como en los casos de terminación de la causa penal (proceso penal) y la negativa del demandante de la demanda civil declarada. También se presta atención a las cuestiones de la incautación de bienes para compensar el daño moral causado por un delito. Con base en los resultados de la consideración de este tema, se llega a la conclusión de que el uso de una medida de coerción procesal en forma de embargo de propiedad es posible no solo con el propósito de indemnizar por daños a la propiedad sino también para crear garantías legales. Garantizar una indemnización por el daño moral causado por un delito, ya que se justifican adiciones específicas a la actual ley procesal penal en Rusia.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Ivanov, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO-University)

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO-University), Moscow, Russia.

Igor Alekseevich Antonov, St. Petersburg Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation

St. Petersburg Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Elena Nikolaevna Кleshchina, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Moscow, Russia.

Lenar Vazyhovich Satdinov, Academy of management of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia

Academy of management of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Elena Vladimirovna Blinova, Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named by V.Ya. Kikot

Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named by V.Ya. Kikot, Moscow, Russia.

Citas

BELYATSKIN, Semen Abramovich. 1996. Compensation for moral (non- property) harm. Yurid. byuro “Gorodets”. Moscow, Russia.

BOZHIEV, Vyacheslav Petrovich. 1989. “Civil suit in criminal procedure” In: Course of the Soviet criminal procedure: general part. Jurid. lit. Moscow, Russia.

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC. 2000. Available online. In: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/64892/92594/F1457735324/AZE64892.pdf. Date of consultation: 09/02/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 174-FZ OF DECEMBER 18. 2001. Available online. In: https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru065en.pdf. Date of consultation: 09/02/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN. 1995. Available online. In: http://www.vertic.org/media/National%20 Legislation/Uzbekistan/UZ_Criminal_Procedure_Code.pdf. Date of consultation: 09/02/2021.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2001. Available online. In: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/ id/21464. Date of consultation: 09/02/2021.

FEDERAL LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF OCTOBER 2, NO. 229-FZ. 2007. Available online. In: https://cis-legislation.com/document. fwx?rgn=18794. Date of consultation: 09/02/2021.

GRITSENKO, Ekaterina Nikolaevna. 2005. Moral harm as a consequence of crimes against life and health: Diss. ... Cand. jurid. sciences. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University). Moscow, Russia.

IVANOV, Dmitry Aleksandrovich. 2015. “On the issue of compensation for moral harm to a legal entity that has suffered from a crime (in comparison with the experience of post-Soviet countries” In: International criminal law and international justice. No. 2, pр. 15-19.

IVANOV, Dmitry Aleksandrovich; KRUPENIN, G.R. 2008. “Compensation for damage to business reputation to legal entities, victims of crimes” In: Russian investigator. No. 24, pр. 5-7.

KRIVOSHCHEKOV, N.V.; BULDAKOVA, V.K. 2014. “Seizure of property as the main measure to ensure compensation for harm caused by a crime” In: Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. Vol. 1, No. 27, pр. 88-97.

MARIUPOLSKIY, L.A. 1970. “Production of inquiry and preliminary investigation (investigative actions)” In: Criminal procedure. Jurid. lit. Moscow, Russia.

PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich; BOZIEV, Taulan Osmanovich; ESINA, Alla Sergeevna; ZHAMKOVA, Olga Evgenievna; CHASOVNIKOVA, Olga Georgievna. 2020. “Criminal prosecution for crimes committed in the banking industry” In: Laplage em Revista. Vol. 6, No. Extra C, pp. 244- 248.

PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich; GAEVOY, Alexander Ivanovich; KOLCHURIN, Andrei Gennadievich; BUKHAROV, Nikolay Nikolaevich; PCHOLOVSKY, Nikolay Kazimirovich. 2021. “Ensuring the principle of adversarial parties by the investigator at the end of the criminal prosecution” In: Laplage em Revista. Vol. 7, no. Extra A, pp. 304-310.

REKUNKOV, Aleksandr Mikhailovich; ORLOVA, A.K. (Eds.). 1981. Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR. Jurid. lit. Moscow, Russia.

SLUCHEVSKY, Vladimir Konstantinovich. 1913. Textbook of the Russian criminal process. Judicial system-legal proceedings. St. Petersburg, Russian Empire.

UKHANOVA, N.V. 2017. “Some problems of seizure of property and compensation for harm caused by a crime in the course of an inquiry” In: Scientific portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Vol. 2, No. 38, pp. 33-37.

YUTKINA, Svetlana Mikhailovna; ROSTOVSHCHIKOVA, Olga Vasilievna. 2012. “On the seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion: history, theory, practice” In: Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Vol. 4, No. 23, pр. 146-150.