Problem of lawyer protection: comparative legal analysis

• Vladislav Yu. Turanin Belgorod State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-8648
• Alexandra Vl. Gridchina Moscow Politechnic University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-8589
• Vera P. Kutina Higher Education «Saint Petersburg Juridical Academy» https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-5605
• Amala A. Umarova Chechen state University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1774-540X
• Stanislav F. Dolgov Belgorod State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5926-3452

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.36

Palabras clave: abogados en Rusia, responsabilidad criminal, actividades legales, análisis comparado, problemas de la protección de los abogados

Resumen

Este artículo está dedicado al análisis de una institución preponderante de la sociedad civil de Rusia como lo es Colegio de Abogados, en consecuencia, se examina su papel en la implementación de la función estatal de brindar asistencia legal calificada. Además, aborda el mecanismo de defensa penal
de la profesión jurídica rusa. Para lograr el objetivo del estudio, se pusieron en marcha varias técnicas científicas generales y métodos de conocimiento científico (análisis, síntesis, deducción, inducción, enfoques sistémicos-estructurales, formal-lógicos) y métodos científicos específicos: histórico-legal, formal-legal, comparativo-legal e interpretativo se emplean. Con base en los resultados obtenidos, se puede concluir que la abogacía, al ser una institución de la sociedad civil, sigue siendo vulnerable en el sentido jurídico en su interacción con los organismos encargados de hacer cumplir la ley. Al mismo tiempo, al interferir ilegalmente en la promoción, los funcionarios públicos quedan impunes. Aún no existe responsabilidad penal por injerencia ilegal en las actividades de un abogado. Por lo tanto, se
propone introducir enmiendas específicas a la legislación penal que regula esta materia de interés general.

Citas

ADLER, Freda; MUELLER, Gerhard O. W; LAUFER, William S. 1994. CriminalJustice: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill. New York, USA.

BRONZE, Iosif Lvovich. 2016. The recent history of the Ukrainian Bar (in documents and articles) [from 1989 to 2015]. In: Aquatoria. University of Odessa. Odesa, Ukraine.

BURNHAM, William. 2000. “The New Russian Criminal Code: A Window onto Democratic Russia” In: Rev. Cent. & E. Eur. No. 26, pp. 365-380.

DETERMINATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIANFEDERATION OF. 2004. No. 25-O “On the complaint of citizen Ivkina

Valentina Onoprievna on violation of her constitutional rights by part of the first art. 45 and art. 405 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation” In: Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, No. 6, 2004. Moscow, Russia. [in Russian]

DETERMINATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIANFEDERATION OF 04.11.2004 NO. 430-O. 2005. “On the complaint ofcitizen Olga Vasilievna Starovoitova for violation of her constitutional rights by paragraph 1 of part two of Article 42, part eighth of art. 162 and part two of art. 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation” In: Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, No. 2, pp. 255-280. [in Russian]

FEDERAL LAW OF MAY 31. No. 63-FZ. 2002. “On advocacy and the legal profession in the Russian Federation” // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. June 10, 2002, No. 23, art. 2102. Moscow, Russia. [in Russian]

HALL, Timothy L. (Edited). 2004. The U.S. Legal system. Volume 1 Acquittal- Jurisdiction, University of Mississippi Law School, by Salem Press, Inc., Pasadena, California Hackensack. New Jersey, USA.

OFFICIAL SITE FOR POSTING INFORMATION ON THE PREPARATION OF DRAFT REGULATORY LEGAL ACTS BY FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AUTHORITIES AND THE RESULTS OF THEIR PUBLIC DISCUSSION. N/d. Draft federal law “On Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (in terms of establishing additional guarantees for the implementation of the adversarial principle)”. Available online. In: https://regulation.gov.ru/projects#npa= 107783. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020). [in Russian]

PARSONS, Talcott. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Egiewood Gliffs (NJ). Prestige-Hall. New York, USA.

REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL CHAMBER OF LAWYERS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 2017 TO APRIL 2019. 2019. Website of the Federal Chamber of Lawyers. Available online. In: https://fparf.ru/ upload/medialibrary/7ce/Otchet-Soveta-FPA_aprel-2017-g.-_-aprel- 2019-g.pdf. Date of consultation 10/12/20. [in Russian]

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 1993. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/constitution-of-the-russian-federation- en/1680a1a237. Date of consultation: 12/03/2021.

THE CRIMEAN CODE OF UKRAINE. 2001. Vidomosty of the Verkhovnaya Rada of Ukraine (VVR), No. 25-26, art. 131. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14?lang=ru#Text. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.

THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 2014.Bulletin of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 13-II, art. 83. Available online. In: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000226. Date of consultation: 12/13/2020.

THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF 13.06.1996.1996. NO. 63-FZ // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. June 17, 1996, No. 25, art. 2954. Moscow, Russia. [in Russian]

THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF 12/18/2001 NO. 174-FZ. 2001. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. December 24, 2001, No. 52 (part I), art. 4921. Moscow, Russia. [in Russian]

TURANIN, Vladislav; SMIRNOVA, Marina; BAGHDASARYAN, Irina; AKHRAMEEVA, Olga; ALEKSANDROVA, Anna. 2020. “The characteristics of legal language taking the psycho-logical aspect” In: Geplat: Caderno Suplementar. No. 2, pp. 96-112.