Perspectives of electronic judicial proceedings’ development: international experience and possibilities of its application in Ukraine

Oleksandr Mykolaiovych  Holovko; Irina V.  Aristova; Volodymyr Viktorovych  Shulhin; Andrii Oleksiovych  Sobakar

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3970.03

Oleksandr Mykolaiovych Holovko V. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-3517
Irina V. Aristova Sumy National Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9211-3464
Volodymyr Viktorovych Shulhin Military Institute Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-453X
Andrii Oleksiovych Sobakar Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-0031

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.03

Palabras clave: litigio electrónico, propiedades útiles, adopción de experiencia, medios eficaces, experiencia internacional

Resumen

Se identifican y analizan las principales direcciones de un mayor desarrollo de la justicia en red. Se presta especial atención a la situación actual en este ámbito en los países desarrollados y democráticos. Teniendo en cuenta la experiencia práctica en la implementación de la justicia electrónica, surgieron posibles formas de implementar formas y métodos progresivos de justicia electrónica. En la actualidad, el desarrollo del sistema judicial ha experimentado cambios significativos y, en primer lugar, positivos en la dirección de la conducción de los procedimientos en modo electrónico. Es decir, se habla comúnmente del llamado «litigio electrónico», de una forma u otra existe en la gran mayoría de países. Se concluye que, a pesar de que la comunidad internacional ha implementado medidas en las que se deben llevar a cabo procedimientos judiciales electrónicos, su aplicabilidad ha sido problemática en Ucrania, lo que ha afectado al sistema judicial. Los procesos relacionados con la administración de justicia son uno de los elementos clave del funcionamiento de la sociedad. Después de todo, están satisfaciendo la demanda de justicia que existe constantemente por parte de los ciudadanos, y esta exigencia es una de las necesidades humanas básicas.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Oleksandr Mykolaiovych Holovko , V. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Jurisprudence, Professor, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine, Head of State and Legal Disciplines Department of V. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Irina V. Aristova , Sumy National Agrarian University

Doctor of Laws, Professor, Head of the Department of Administrative and Information Law, Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, Ukraine.

Volodymyr Viktorovych Shulhin, Military Institute Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Military Special Training, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Military Institute Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Andrii Oleksiovych Sobakar, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs

Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Administrative Law, Process and Administrative Activities, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Dnieper, Ukraine.

Citas

AFSHAR, Mariam; AHMAD, Kamsuriah. 2015. “A new hybrid model for electronic record management” In: Journal of Theoreticaland Applied Information Technology. Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 489-495.

AIQA MOHAMAD ZAIN, Nurul. 2018. “Developing Legal Framework for E-Court in Judicial Delivery”. In: International Journal of Engineering & Technology. Vol. 7, No. 3.7, pp. 202-205.

ALSHIBLY, Haitham; CHIONG, Raymond; BAO, Yukun. 2016. “Investigating the Critical Success Factors for Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in Governments: Evidence from Jordan” In: Information Systems Management. Vol. 33, No.4, pp. 287-301.

ANDRADE, André; JOIA, Luiz Antonio. 2012. “Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian judiciary system” In: Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 29, pp. 32-42.

ARIAL, Denise L. 2001. “History of the Federal Judiciary Website: Washington, DC: The Federal Judicial Center” In: Journal of Government Information. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 351-353.

BAKAIANOVA, Nana; POLIANSKYI, Yurii; SVYDA, Oleksii. 2020.“Information technology in the litigation due to the pandemic COVID-19” In: Political Questions. Vol. 38, No. 67, pp. 485-499.

CANO, Jesus; JIMÉNEZ, Carlos E; HERNÁNDEZ, Roberto; Salvador, Ros. 2015. New tools for e-Justice: Legal research available to any citizen. Conference: In: 2015 Second International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), pp. 108-111.

CONCEPT OF THE ELECTRONIC COURT OF UKRAINE. 2012. Available online. In: https://ukbs.org.ua/files/koncept_digital_ukr .pdf. Consultation date: 25/03/2021.

FABRI, Marco; LUPO, Giampiero. 2012. Some European and Australian e-justice services. Report prepared for the project “Rethinking Processual Law: Toward CyberJustice”. (October 19th 2012). Available online. In: https://www.cyberjustice.ca/files/sites/102/WP001_EU_Australia_e- justice_IRSIG20121019.pdf. Consultation date: 25/03/2021.

JULIAN, Roberta; KELTY, Sally F. 2015. “Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court” In: Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 195-206.

LEYH, Christian. 2016. Critical Success Factors for ERP Projects in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises – The Perspective of Selected German SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (pp. 1181–1190). Available online. In: https://annals-csis.org/Volume_2/pliks/243.pdf. Consultation date: 12/03/2021.

LUPO, Giampiero; BAILEY, Jane. 2014. “Designing and Implementing e-Justice Systems: Some Lessons Learned from EU and Canadian Examples” In: Laws, Vol. 3(2), pp. 353-387.

LYZOHUB, Ya. 2019. “The Law as a Drawbar, or Judicial Arbitrariness: Recidivism = Repetition of Crimes in the Framework of Circumstances Aggravating the Punishment” In: Law and Safety. Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 75- 81.

SAMAN, Wan Satirah Wan Mohd; HAIDER, Abrar. 2012. “Electronic Court Records Management: A Case Study”. In: Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices. Available online. In: https://ibimapublishing. com/articles/JEGSBP/2012/925115/925115.pdf. Consultation date: 12/03/2021.

SHEPHERD, Elizabeth; YEO, Geoffrey. 2003. Managing Records: A Handbook of Principles and Practice. Facet Publishing. London, UK.

THERE WAS THE TRIAL IN CHINA, WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A JUDGE WAS FULFILLED FOR THE FIRST TIME BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. 2019. Available online. In: https://www.everest.ua/ u-kytayi-vpershe-provely-sudove-zasidannya-na-yakomu-funkcziyu- suddi-vykonuvav-shi/. Consultation date: 13/03/2021. In: Law and Safety. Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 104-109.

ZURYAN, V. 2020. “Current problems and prospects for the development of electronic legal proceedings in Ukraine”. In: Bulletin of the penitentiary association of Ukraine. Vol. 4, No. 14, pp. 173-181.