The role of the constitutional complaint in the legislative process: Comparative legal aspect

• Nataliia I. Brovko Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
• Liudmyla P. Medvid National Defense University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi
• Ihor Y. Mahnovskyi Odessa State University of Internal Affairs
• Vusal A. Ahmadov Academy of Justice at the Ministry of Justice Azerbaijan Republic
• Maksym I. Leonenko Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.51

Palabras clave: denuncia constitucional, justicia constitucional, proceso constitucional, sistema legislativo, tribunal constitucional

Resumen

El artículo estudia el papel de la denuncia constitucional en el sistema de aseguramiento de la calidad de la legislación estatal, para la protección de los derechos y libertades. Las quejas constitucionales, así como sus modelos óptimos, requieren una investigación detallada. El análisis comparativo y la encuesta son los métodos principales de esta investigación. El objeto de una denuncia constitucional en el modelo propuesto por los autores pueden ser leyes o sus disposiciones individuales, reglamentos de jefes de estado, de gobierno, otros estatutos y reglamentos, actos administrativos individuales, sentencias en casos específicos. Los ciudadanos, los extranjeros, los apátridas y las personas jurídicas son sujetos que tienen derecho a presentar una denuncia constitucional. A modo de conclusión los autores atribuyen las siguientes condiciones de admisibilidad de una denuncia constitucional: la presencia y prueba de la violación de sus derechos y libertades constitucionales, el uso de todos los demás recursos para proteger los derechos y libertades violados, el cumplimiento de los plazos para la presentación de una denuncia constitucional en algunos países y pago de impuestos estatales. Sin embargo, el modelo propuesto por los autores es universal y debe detallarse más para los países de interés.

Citas

ALBERT, Richard; LANDAU, David; FARAGUNA, Pietro; DRUGDA, Šimon. (Eds.). 2018. “Global Review of Constitutional Law.” Available Online. In:https://poseidon01.ssrn.comdelivery.php?ID=720026113081005107126020126091096102019014069017088036022084109118021110072071026100025100029023038019107087115105111030028087042047011052015001031066005001030092067055085127089124004020111117121118003127076082022029007007079107115002093029067028081&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE. Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

AYDIN ÇAKIR, Aylin; ŞEKERCIOĞLU, Eser. 2016. “Public confidence in the judiciary: the interaction between political awareness and level of democracy” In: Democratization. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 634-656.

BENTSEN, Henrik Litleré; MCKENZIE, Mark Jonathan.; SKIPLE, Jon Kåre. 2019. “Confronting SKAT in the Højesteret: An investigation into how EU law, precedent, litigant resources, and structural reform shape tax decisions” In: UCHP Fiscal Relations Law Journal. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-30.

BIELEN, Samantha; PEETERS, Ludo; MARNEFFE, Wim; VEREECK, Lode. 2018. “Backlogs and litigation rates: Testing congestion equilibrium across European judiciaries” In: International Review of Law and Economics. Vol. 53, pp. 9-22.

BRICKER, Benjamin; WONDREYS, Jakub. 2018. “Public opinion and opposition party success: Evidence from the European constitutional courts” Justice System Journal. Vol. 39, pp. 123-138.

CASETEXT. 2020. Goldstein v. Sec’y Commonwealth. Available online. In: https://casetext.com/case/goldstein-v-secy-commonwealth Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

GAROUPA, Nuno. 2020. “Constitutional Courts in Civil-Law Western Europe: Quantitative Approaches. George Mason Law & Economics. Research paper No. 20-05.” Available online. In: https://poseidon01.ssrn.comdelivery.php?ID=04809811911009700007300402809810109501900706405904808711209510509412607408112309408612006204400600609606212609812095031093110059085090089088066120111020101076089086051013101112126096011095121118096093004125008126004001118126104126110067121085089006&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE. Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

GONZÁLEZ-OCANTOS, Ezequiel. 2016. “Evaluations of human rights trials and trust in judicial institutions: Evidence from Fujimori’s trial in Peru” In: The International Journal of Human Rights. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 445- 470.

HALMAI, Gábor. 2018. “Abuse of constitutional identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on interpretation of Article E) (2) of the fundamental law” In: Review of Central and East European Law. Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 23-42.

INSHYN, Mykola; МІROSHNYCHENKO, Yurii; PAIDA, Yurii. 2018. “Protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the constitutional court of Ukraine” In: Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp, 134-139.

INTERNETOWY SYSTEM AKTÓW PRAWNYCH. 1997. The Constitution Of The Republic Of Poland Of April 2, 1997, Adopted By The National Assembly On April 2, 1997, Adopted By The Nation In A Constitutional Referendum On May 25, 1997, Signed By The President Of The Republic Of Poland On July 16, 1997. Available online. In: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/ isap.nsf/home.xsp Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

KOMMERS, Donald P.; MILLER, Russell A. 2012. “The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany” 3rd edition, revised and expanded.” Duke University Press, Durham, UK.

KOSAŘ, D.; VYHNÁNEK, L. 2020. Constitutional identity in the Czech Republic. In C. Calliess; G. van der Shyff (eds.), “Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism”. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

KYSELA, Joseph. 2014. The Influence of the Constitutional Court on the Rules of Legislative Process in the Czech Republic. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, Research Paper No. 2014/II/4/. Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2540565. Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

LÜBBE-WOLFF, Gertrude. 2016. Constitutional courts and democracy. Facets of an ambivalent relationship. In: Klaus Meßerschmidt; A. Daniel Oliver- Lalana (eds.), “Rational Lawmaking under Review”. Springer, Cham.

MAVČIČ, Arne. 2000. Constitutional Court Act With Explanations, (Nomos Collection). Nova revija. Ljubljana, Slovenia.

MEYER, Philipp. 2020. “Judicial public relations: Determinants of press release publication by constitutional courts” In: Politics. Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 477-493.

NAVARRETE, Rosa M.; CASTILLO-ORTIZ, Pablo. 2020. “Constitutional courts and citizens’ perceptions of judicial systems in Europe” In: Comparative European Politics. Vol. 18, pp, 128-150.

PELLEGRINA, Lucia Dalla.; GAROUPA, Nuno; GÓMEZ-POMAR, Fernando. 2017. “Estimating judicial ideal points in the Spanish supreme court: The case of administrative review” In: International Review of Law and Economics. Vol. 52, pp. 16-28.

PETRIV, Ivan Mykhaylovych. 2020. “Practical aspects of the implementation by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of functional powers in the mechanism of state authority” In: Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Vol. 4, pp. 129-139.

PILDES, Richard H. 2020, June 17. The Constitutional Emergency Powers of Federal Courts. Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3629356. Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

REUTTER,Werner.2020.SubnationalConstitutionalCourtsandJudicialization in Germany. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020- 00293-8. Date of consultation: 20/12/2020.

REZENDE OLIVEIRA, Mariana. 2020. “Constitutional courts in transitions to democracy: Limits, critiques and possibilities in Brazil and Argentina” In: Latin American Law Review. Vol. 5, pp. 27-44.

SADURSKI, Wojciech. 2015. Constitutional courts and legislation. In: “Rights Before Courts” Springer, Cham.

SINCLAIR, Barbara. 2015. Can Congress be trusted with the Constitution? The effects of incentives and procedures. In: Neil Devins; Keith E. Whittington (eds.), “Congress and the Constitution”. Duke University Press. Durham, UK.

WENDEL, M., REESTMAN, J. H., CLAES, M. 2020. “Better in than out: When constitutional courts rely on the charter” In: European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-7.

ZUPANČIČ, Boštjan M. 2020. “Constitutional law and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: An attempt at a synthesis” In: Revus. Vol. 1, pp. 57-61.