Regulation of advocacy profession: global trends

• Tetiana Vilchyk Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University
• Alla Sokolova Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University
• Tetiana Demchyna Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.43

Palabras clave: asociación de defensores, regulación de la defensa, independencia de la defensa, asociaciones autónomas de defensores, regulación de la abogacía

Resumen

El objetivo del articulo consiste en analizar la regulación de la profesión de abogado y sus tendencias globales. Hay muchos tipos diferentes de reguladores a nivel mundial, y muchas fuentes y métodos diferentes de regulación. No existe un enfoque sencillo para establecer metas para regular la profesión de abogacía en diferentes sistemas legales. Aunque la autorregulación de la profesión de abogacía se considera la base para adherirse al estándar de su independencia, al mismo tiempo, los académicos reconocen la existencia de la teoría de la gestión de la abogacía. Para estudiar estos problemas, los autores realizaron un estudio comparativo de los modelos de regulación de la profesión de abogacía en el mundo en términos del cumplimiento de los estándares internacionales de independencia de la abogacía en diferentes jurisdicciones legales e hicieron algunas sugerencias para mejorar la regulación legal de la abogacía en Ucrania. Las fuentes empíricas para la investigación científica fueron documentos internacionales, decisiones judiciales, legislación nacional de Gran Bretaña, Canadá, Estados Unidos, Irlanda, Escocia, Australia y otros, y el trabajo de científicos. El artículo utiliza métodos científicos generales - dialéctica, análisis, síntesis, analogía, etc., y métodos especiales, particularmente el derecho comparado legal, histórico legal y formal.

Citas

BAKAIANOVA, Nana; SVYDA, Oleksii; DEMENCHUK, Maryna; DZHABURIYA, Olena; FOMINA, Oksana. 2019. “Advocacy of Ukraine under constitutional reform” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 22, pp. 574-579.

BROMWICH, Rebecca. 2018. “(Where Is) the Tipping Point for Governmental Regulation of Canadian Lawyers: Perhaps It Is in Paradise: Critically Assessing Regulation of Lawyer Involvement with Money Laundering After Canada-Attorney General-v Federation of Law Societies of Canada” In: Man. LJ. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 11-26.

BODRUNOVA, Svetlana S. 2021. “Information disorder practices in/ by contemporary Russia” In: The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. Routledge. Vol. 123, pp. 279-289.

CONE III, Sydney M. 2007. “International Legal Practice Involving England and New York Following Adoption of the United Kingdom Legal Services Act of 2007.” Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. Vol. 28, pp. 400-415.

DJABURIA, Elena. 2019. “Organizational forms of advocacy related to the creation of a legal entity: some problem aspects” In: Jurnalul juridic national: teorie şi practică, Vol. 36, No. 2-1, pp. 59-62.

DODEK, Adam; ALDERSON, Emily. 2017. “Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession” In: Alta. L. Rev. Vol. 55, pp. 608- 621.

DOMBERGER, Simon; SHERR Avrom. 1989. “The impact of competition on pricing and quality of legal services” In: International Review of Law and Economics. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 41-56.

DUBAL, Veena B. 2017. “The drive to precarity: A political history of work, regulation, & labor advocacy in San Francisco’s taxi & Uber economies” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law. Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 73- 135.

GREGORY, Paul; AUSTIN, Zubin. 2019. “Pharmacists’ lack of profession-hood: professional identity formation and its implications for practice” In: Canadian Pharmacists Journal/Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada. Vol. 152, No. 4, pp. 251-256.

GREER, Steven; WILLIAMS, Andrew. 2009. “Human rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: towards ‘individual’, ‘constitutional’or ‘institutional’justice?” In: European Law Journal. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 462- 481.

GUESS, C. Dominik; TUASON, Ma Teresa; GÖLTENBOTH, Noemi; MIRONOVA, Anastasia. 2018. “Creativity through the eyes of professional artists in Cuba, Germany, and Russia” In: Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology. Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 261-289.

HATCHER, Mark. 2019. “The General Council of the Bar: a Note on its History” In: Legal Information Management. Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 161-169.

KAZUN, Anton; YAKOVLEV, Andrei. 2017. “Who demands collective action in an imperfect institutional environment? A case study of the profession of advocates in Russia” In: Journal of Eurasian studies. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 60-71.

MAHARRAMLI, Etibar Vali. 2020. “Legal Framework for Free Legal Aid in Ukraine” In: Public Administration and Law Review. Vol. 2, pp. 52-62.

MOISEEVA, Ekaterina. 2017. “Plea bargaining in Russia: the role of defence attorneys and the problem of asymmetry” In: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 163-184.
MOWBRAY, Alastair. 2005. “The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights” In: Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 57-79.

PARKER, Christine. 2002. “Regulation of the ethics of Australian legal practice: autonomy and responsiveness” In: UNSWLJ. Vol. 25, pp. 649-676.

TERRY, Angela Dawson. 1997. “What’s a Lawyer to Do: The Tension between Zealous Advocacy and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct” In: Am. J. Trial Advoc. Vol. 21, pp. 357-371.

TERRY, Laurel S. 2013. “Transnational Legal Practice (International)” In: Int’l Law. Vol. 47, No. 475-485.

ZABOROVSKYY, Viktor; BULETSA, Sibilla; BYSAGA, Yuriy; MANZYUK, Vasyl. 2020. “Compliance of guarantees of professional activity of ukrainian advocate with international standards of profession of advocate” In: The Lawyer Quarterly. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 170-187.