The  Franchise Agreement in International Trade: its Advantages and Disadvantages

Mohammad  Mehdipour; Parviz Bagheri

doi:10.46398/cuestpol.3969.17

Mohammad Mehdipour Islamic Azad University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-0935
Parviz Bagheri Ilam University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-7609

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.17

Palabras clave: acuerdo de franquicia, franquiciador, franquiciado, red de franquicias, marca registrada

Resumen

El objetivo del artículo es analizar las implicaciones del contrato de franquicia en el comercio internacional. Uno de los contratos que se suele registrar después de la aparición y registro de los derechos de propiedad, y especialmente después del desarrollo de los derechos de marca, es el contrato de franquicia. Un acuerdo de franquicia es un contrato celebrado entre el franquiciador y el franquiciado como propietario de los derechos de propiedad intelectual. En otras palabras, el franquiciado suele utilizar derechos de marca y derechos de propiedad intelectual que pertenecen al franquiciador, que tienen una duración limitada. Se concluye que, en un contrato de franquicia, existe el derecho de hacer cumplir el método comercial del franquiciador, que se implementa dentro de la red (este método incluye el uso de derechos de propiedad intelectual y conocimientos técnicos). Este contrato tiene términos detallados y está estrechamente relacionado con los derechos de propiedad intelectual y los derechos de competencia. La franquicia debe distinguirse del contrato de distribución, el concesionario y la licencia. Según este acuerdo, el franquiciado ingresa a la red de franquicias y se compromete a utilizar el método de negociación del franquiciador y pagar en su lugar, pagos libres de regalías.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Mohammad Mehdipour, Islamic Azad University

Assist. Prof, Department of Law, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran

Parviz Bagheri, Ilam University

Assist. Prof. Department of Law, Ilam University, Ilam. Iran

Citas

ACT, CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES. 1995. California Civil Code.

AHLSTRAND, Karin. 2000. Vertical distribution agreements under EC competition law-background and the new Block Exemption Regulation.

AMERI, F. 2010. “Treaties overseeing government cooperation and their role in technology transfer” In: International Legal Journal. No. 43, p. 70.

ANDERMAN, STEVEN D (Ed.). 2007. The interface between intellectual property rights and competition policy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

BASSIOUNI, M. Cherif. 1999. «Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the establishment of an International Criminal Court» In: Cornell Int’l LJ. Vol. 32, p443.

BURNS, Charlotte. 2004. “Codecision and the European Commission: a study of declining influence?” In: Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-18.

CARR, Indira; STONE, Peter. 2013. International trade law. Routledge. London, UK.

CASSESE, Antonio; GAETA, Paola; JONES, John RWD. 2002. The Rome statute of the international criminal court: A commentary. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

CINI, Michelle. 1997. «Administrative culture in the European Commission: The cases of competition and environment.» In At the Heart of the Union, pp. 71-88. Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

COOK, Jeffrey J; AZNAR, Alexandra; GRUNWALD, Bryn; HOLM, Alison. 2021. «Hand me the franchise agreement: municipalities add another policy tool to their clean energy toolbox» In: Solar Energy. Vol. 214, pp. 62-71.

CALDERON-MONGE, Esther. 2018. Personality Traits of the Partners and Performance in the Franchise Agreement. Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Springer, Cham.

CRAIG, Paul. 2010. The Lisbon Treaty: law, politics, and treaty reform. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

ENTESSAR, Nader. 1988. «Criminal law and the legal system in revolutionary Iran.» BC Third World LJ 8. 91.

GINSBURG, Jane C. 2002. “The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law” In: DePaul L. Rev. Vol. 52, p.1063.

DUFFY, John F. 2002. Harmony and diversity in global patent law. College of William & Mary Law School. Williamsburg, USA.

KATOUZIAN, Homa. 1980. Historical Perspectives: From Political Economy to Positive Economics. Ideology and Method in Economics. Palgrave. London, UK.

KIOUSSI, Sofia. 2008. Quality design, construction and development enterprises: Exploring the model and marketing strategies for integration. Diss. UCL (University College London). London, UK.

MAULIDIANA, Lina. 2017. «Implementation Of Franchise Agreement Perspective In Contract Law» In: International Journal of Social Sciences and Development. Pp. 61-74.

NUGENT, Neill; RHINARD, Mark. 2015. The European commission. Macmillan International Higher Education. London, UK.

RICKETSON, Sam; GINSBURG, Jane C. 2006. International copyright and neighboring rights: The Berne convention and beyond. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

SECKELMANN, Margrit. 2011. «From the Paris Convention (1883) to the TRIPS Agreement (1994): The History of the International Patent Agreements as a History of Propertisation?.» In: Comparativ. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 46-63.

SINGER, Joseph William. 1982. «The legal rights debate in analytical jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld» In: Wisconsin Law Review. Vol. 1982, No. 6, pp. 975-890

THE EUROPEAN FRANCHISE FEDERATION (EFF). 2016. EFF European Code of Ethics for Franchising.

TRIASIH, Dharu; MURYATI, Dewi Tuti. 2020. «Legal Protection of the Parties in the Franchise Agreement.» The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020). Atlantis Press. Paris, France.

VON BAR, Christian. 2002. «Communication on European contract law: joint response of the Commission on European Contract Law and the Study Group on a European Civil Code» In: European Review of Private Law. Vol. 10, No. 2.

WIRTÉN, Eva Hemmungs. 2010. «Colonial Copyright, Postcolonial Publics: The Berne Convention and the 1967 Stockholm Diplomatic Conference Revisited» In: SCRIPTed. No. 7, pp. 532-550.