Aplicación de las normas y peculiaridades de la armonización (aplicación) de las leyes relativas al contrabando de drogas

• Alexey P. Albov Russian Customs Academy (RTA), Russia
• Vera E. Batyukova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia
• Ekaterina I. Kobzeva Russian University of transport (RUT MIIT), Russia
• Natalia S. Ponomareva Moscow University for Industry and Finance «Synergy», Russia
• Nikolay N. Kosarenko Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russia

Palabras clave: procedimiento penal, derecho procesal, contrabando de estupefacientes, cumplimiento del estado de derecho, sistema jurídico

Resumen

El artículo examina el problema del desarrollo de la legislación rusa en el marco de la implementación de las normas de procedimientos penales relacionadas con el contrabando de drogas. Se propone examinar la cuestión de la eficacia y la prevención de los delitos relacionados con el contrabando de drogas mediante la armonización de la legislación nacional. Se presta especial atención a la interacción de las normas rusas e internacionales de derecho procesal. Se hace hincapié en el análisis exhaustivo del sistema de aplicación del derecho, del que depende el logro efectivo de los objetivos en materia de represión del delito de tráfico de drogas. El estudio del material documental demuestra que el mecanismo de aplicación de las normas penales no es del todo sencillo: por una parte, las apelaciones a las normas jurídicas extranjeras se consideran un discurso científico improductivo y; por la otra, las teorías se basan en el daño causado a su propio sistema jurídico como resultado de los préstamos injustificados de otros sistemas jurídicos. Los resultados y las conclusiones pueden utilizarse en la labor práctica de las aduanas y los organismos encargados de la aplicación de la ley.

Citas

ALIZADEH, F.E. 2010. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy deyatelnosti po provedeniyu sovmestnykh (mezhdunarodnykh) rassledovanii v dokumentakh Organizatsii Obedinennykh Natsii “International legal framework for joint (international) investigations in United Nations documents” In: Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. No. 3, pp. 35-30.

BAKHMAIER, Vinter, L. 2012. Osnovnye cherty etapa predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya v ugolovnom protsesse SShA [Main features of the preliminary investigation stage in the US criminal process]. In: Predvaritelnoe rassledovanie v ugolovnom protsesse stran Tsentralnoi Azii: mezhdu inkvizitsionnoi i sostyazatelnoi modelyu [Preliminary investigation in the criminal process of Central Asian countries: between the inquisitorial and adversarial model]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Frankfurt, Germany.

BELIY, I.Yu. 2008. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi protsess i organy voennoi yustitsii Rossii: voprosy vozmozhnogo sotrudnichestva v sfere mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva “International criminal procedure and military justice bodies of Russia: issues of possible cooperation in the field of international criminal proceedings” In: Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh. Voenno-pravovoe obozrenie. No. 8, pp. 269-300.

COUNCIL DECISION ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN POLICE OFFICE. 2009. (Europol). (6 April 2009). Official Journal of the European Union, 121, 37-66.

COUNCIL DECISION. 2005. 2005/671/JHA on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offenses. (20 September 2005). Official Journal of the European Union. No. 253, pp. 22-24.

FRAMEWORK DECISION ON JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS. 2002. (2002/465/ JHA). (13 June 2002). Official Journal of the European Union. No. 162, 1.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT. 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Available online. In: https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf. Consultation date: 12/03/2020.

LUKASHUK, Igor Ivanovich. 1997. Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v mezhdunarodnoi normativnoi sisteme [Norms of international law in the international normative system]. Spark. Moscow, Russia.

PLACHTA, Michael. 2005. Joint “Investigation Teams. A New Form of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters” In: European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. No. 2, pp. 292-311.

SAFAROV, Nizami Abdullah. 2006. Problemy implementatsii Rimskogo statuta Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda: opyt Germanii “Problems of Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: German Experience” In: Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. No. 12, pp. 15-28.

STATUT DU TRIBUNAL PENAL INTERNATIONAL POUR L 'EXYOUGOSLAVIE. 1993. Dov. off. N U Res. Doc NU S/ RES/ 827.

STATUT DU TRIBUNAL PENAL INTERNATIONAL POUR LE RWANDA. 1994. Dov. off. C.S. NU Res. Doc. № U S/RES/955.

THE SINGLE CONVENTION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS. 1961. 1972 Protocol (Concluded in New York on March 30, 1961). Available online. In: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/commissions/CND/conventions.html. Consultation date: 15/12/2019.

TIUNOV, O.I. 2005. Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, in: Pravovoe obespechenie mezhgosudarstvennoi integratsi [Generally recognized principles and norms of international law and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, in: Legal support of interstate integration]. Moscow, Russia.

TOMPSON, R.A; NORED, L.S; WORELL, A.L; KHEMMENS, S. 2008. Vvedenie v dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam [Introduction to Proof in Criminal Cases]. Oxford Press. New York, USA.

TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED TEXT) 2002. (December 24, 2002) In: Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels, Belgium.

TRIKOZ, Elena Nikolaevna. 2005. Nachalo deyatelnosti Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda: sostoyanie i perspektivy “The beginning of the activities of the International Criminal Court: state and prospects” In: Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. No. 3, pp. 45-62.

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES. 1988. (December 20). Available online. In: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/illicit-trafficking.html?ref=menuside. Consultation date: 12/03/2020.

VASILEVA, L.N. 2005. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii v borbe s nezakonnym oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veshchestv [International organizations in the fight against illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances]. Yuridicheskii mir, 9.

VILLASMIL Espinoza, Jorge. 2021. “Implicaciones de la inteligencia artificial para la humanidad” In: Revista de la Universidad del Zulia. Vol. 12, No. 32, pp. 4-6. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.32.01. Consultation date: 12/09/2020.


VOLEVODZ, Alexander Grigorievich; SOLOVEV, Alexander B. 2007. Mezhdunarodnyi rozysk, arest, konfiskatsiya i peredacha inostrannym gosudarstvam denezhnykh sredstv i imushchestva, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, a takzhe veshchestvennykh dokazatelstv po ugolovnym delam [International search, arrest, confiscation, and transfer to foreign states of money and property obtained by criminal means, as well as material evidence in criminal cases]. Yurlitinform. Moscow, Russia.

WORLD DRUG REPORT. 2019. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Available online. In: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/WDR19_Booklet_1_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.pdf. Consultation date: 12/03/2020.