Virtual Mediation in the Field of Intellectual Property

  • Tetiana Blashchuk The National University of Ostroh Academy
  • Olha Shmyndruk National University of Ostroh Academy
  • Volodymyr Buha Institute of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
  • Olena Pysmenna Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University
  • Natalia Popova Cherkasy Bogdan Khmelnytsky National University
Palabras clave: chatbots, information technologies, intellectual property, online mediation, legal informatics.

Resumen

The work aims to analyze the theoretical aspects of the use of information technologies in the mediation process, as well as the aspects of its implementation. The purpose of the investigation is online mediation as a form of resolution of intellectual property disputes. In addition, the topic of study is the social relationships that arise when using information technologies and mediation to resolve civil conflicts in the field of intellectual property. The research methods used in this case are the dialectical method, the generalization method, the comparison method, the analysis method, the synthesis method, the method in administration and the deduction method, the modeling method, and the abstraction method. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn on the state of online mediation in the real world, the benefits and potential problems of introducing virtual mediation for disputed parties, the need for support for special applications, along with the need for the introduction of online mediation at the state level to a state policy.

Biografía del autor/a

Olha Shmyndruk, National University of Ostroh Academy
Department of Civil-Legal Disciplines, the National University of Ostroh Academy, Ukraine
Volodymyr Buha, Institute of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
Department of Legal Disciplines, Donetsk Law Institute of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
Olena Pysmenna, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University
Department of Theory and History of State and Law and Administrative Law, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, Ukraine
Natalia Popova, Cherkasy Bogdan Khmelnytsky National University
Department of Intellectual Property and Civil law, Cherkasy Bogdan Khmelnytsky National University, Ukraine

Citas

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION. 2020. Available online. In: https://www.adr.org/. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

CIVIL CODE OF UKRAINE. 2003. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 2003 Nº 435-IV. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

FEDERAL COURT LAW OF AUSTRALIA. 1976. Federal Court Act. No. 156, 1976. Available online. In: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00342. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

FEDERAL COURT LAW OF AUSTRALIA. 2011. Federal Court Rules. Available online. In: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00342. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

IMI MEDIATION. 2019. EU-EEA Legislation on Mediation. Available online. In: https://www.imimediation.org/resources/eu-eea-legislation-on-mediation/. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS IN THE FIELD OF JUSTICE. 2010. Programa conjunto de la Unión Europea y el Consejo de Europa "Transparencia y eficiencia del sistema judicial de Ucrania". Truth. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/elcat/new/detail.php3?doc_id=1403408. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

IQ DECISION. 2020. Virtual mediation: settlement of business disputes through the internet. Available online. In: https://iqdecision.com/virtualnaja-mediacija-uregulirovanie-biznes-sporov-cherez-internet/. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

KATAEVA, E. 2013. “National features of mediation in Ukraine: experience and prospects” In: Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. Vol. 3, pp. 156-161.

KHARYTONOV, Evgen; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; KHARYTONOVA, Tetiana; KOLODIN, Denis; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2019. “Human rights as the basic value of the concept of private law in modern Europe” In: Amazonia Investiga, Vol. 8, No. 20, pp. 477 – 485.

KODYNETS, Anatoliy. 2018. “Protection of intellectual property rights in terms of judicial” In: Entrepreneurship, economy, and law. Vol. 3, pp. 9–13.

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS. 2014. On mediation, No. 58-Z. Available online. In: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=H11300058. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

LEGAL SUPPORT. 2020. Online mediator services. Available online. In: https://legal-support.top/poslugi-onlain-mediatora/. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

LIGA NET. 2019. Roshen vs Kyiv Bakery and Confectionery Plant: The cake case has reached the Supreme Court. Available online. In: https://biz.liga.net/all/prodovolstvie/novosti/roshen-vs-bkk-delo-o-tortah-doshlo-do-verhovnogo-suda. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEDIATORS OF UKRAINE. 2017. Namu mediator code of ethics. Available online. In: http://namu.com.ua/ua/info/mediators/ethical-code/. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

NATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE. 2020. Available online. In: https://www.ncrconline.com/. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

NORWAY. 1991. Law On National Mediation Treatment (National Mediation Act). Available online. In: https://www.global-regulation.com/translation/norway/5961973/law-on-national-mediation-treatment-%2528national-mediation-act%2529.html. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

ROZHENTSOVA. Olesya. 2019. SMM Trends in 2019: From Chat Bots to Shopping Tags. Multimedia sila.media. Available online. In: https://sila.media/smm2019/. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1998. UK Statutory Instruments, 1998 No. 3132. Available online. In: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/3132/contents. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

THE FEDERAL LAW RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2010. On an Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure with the Participation of a Mediator. Mediation Procedure, July 27, 2010 N 193-FZ. Available online. In: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_103038/. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

TKALYCH, Maxym; SAFONCHYK Oksana; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2020. “Private Law and human rights: New realities” In: DIXI. Vol. 32, p. 1-12.

TROTSYUK, Nina Valeriyivna. 2016. “Mediation as an alternative way of resolving intellectual property disputes” In: Legal Bulletin. Vol. 4 (41), pp. 116-124. Available online. In: http://law.nau.edu.ua/images/Nauka/Naukovij_jurnal/2016/statji_n4_41_2016/21.pdf. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

UKRAINIAN MEDIATION CENTER. 2004. Code of Ethics of the Mediator. Available online. In: http://ukrmediation.com.ua/ua/pro-tsentr/kodeksetyky-mediatora/2-kodeks-etykymediatora. Consultation date: 01/10/2020.

UNITED STATES. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS. 2001. Uniform Mediation Act. Available online. In: https://www.mediate.com/articles/umafinalstyled.cfm. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

USAID UKRAINE. 2019. Comprehensive analysis of the current context, barriers and opportunities for the development of mediation with recommendations for the development and implementation of mediation in Ukraine. Available online. In: https://newjustice.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/New-Justice_Comprehensive_Analyses_on_-Mediation_-for_Ukraine_Ales_Zalar_UKR.pdf. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

VOLKOVA, Nataliia; PRYTULIAK, Valerii; TSAL-TSALKO, Yuliia; YANITSKA, Inna; POLIUK Yuliia. 2019. “General characteristics of the claim in the countries of the anglo-saxon and continental law” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 22, pp. 350 – 356.

WIPO CENTER FOR ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION WEBSITE. 2020. Available online. In: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/index.html. Consultation date: 02/03/2020.

Publicado
2020-12-09